POLITICO’s Post

Traditionally the president-elect would have discussion about who might get through full Senate approval for various roles. This is a positive feature of representative democracy: party center and fringe voices being heard. With the topping of the GOP by staunch maga from 2016, the hemming in longtime SML Mitch and eliminating the large party center the 47th president may try to direct votes. THAT is not the United States of America and that would not be characteristic of our three independent branch system of government! We reach across to negotiate with moderates. At some point maga leaders who supported 40 and 41and even democrat JFK must display appropriate reverence for our most basic democratic traditions in this country. We cannot have a complete takeover of power by a white house. The Senate does not hold the country hostage. The president should not feel comfortable telling the Senate majority what has to happen. Please establish discussion and inter party negotiation. Admiral Ron Scott SOCOM, JCS Former Congressional Advisor Read "Don’t stand in the way of my cabinet picks, Trump tells Senate" on SmartNews: https://lnkd.in/e_bbrdgT

Please read the full article along with the comment at the end if you want to gain insight into Dem actions aimed to destroy our critical relationship with Israel.

https://lnkd.in/ghHqgHDf Motice News Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee introduced a resolution Thursday to amend the U.S. Constitution and allow Donald Trump—and only Trump—to serve a third term as president. The move comes just three days after Trump was sworn into office for a second, non-consecutive term, and it signals the GOP's ongoing dedication to consolidating power around one figure rather than addressing the needs of the working class. The proposed amendment seeks to change the current constitutional text to allow a president to serve three terms. Ratified in 1951, the 22nd Amendment was designed to prevent a repeat of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's four-term presidency, a historical anomaly driven by the extraordinary circumstances of the Great Depression and World War II. Ogles’ amendment, however, would only allow presidents elected to non-consecutive terms to run for a third term; it would not apply to presidents who had served two consecutive terms. Effectively, it would only benefit only Trump. Trump has long hinted at his willingness to break democratic norms, joking about serving beyond two terms and flirting with the idea of a presidency that extends indefinitely. In private meetings with Republican lawmakers and public speeches, Trump has floated the possibility of serving longer, demonstrating his comfort with the idea of eroding constitutional safeguards to maintain his grip on power. The resolution faces slim odds of passing, given the Republican Party’s razor-thin three-seat majority in the House and the constitutional hurdles of ratification. But its introduction serves a symbolic purpose: rallying Trump's base and normalizing anti-democratic proposals in public discourse.

Hmm 🤔 Well Franklin D. Roosevelt served more than two terms from 1933-1945 (12 years is essentially three four-year terms). So it isn't too far-fetched and it has been done before. I think the ultra-left or Constitutionalist Right would be adamantly against it due to its tyrannical flavor. I do understand the concepts. I think it will take time for America to re-establish itself with all the taxes and tariffs to change geopolitically, however, I also couldn't imagine having a three-term-serving president like Woodrow Wilson or, no offense, our previous president. Not only has our economy been in shambles, we did not have Agency to act on certain things we should have a long time ago. Businesses have been failing, look at all the chapter 11 bankruptcies in the last 4 years. I fully welcome the change despite the animosity it has come with. At least now we can be a bit more negotiable. These next 4 years will be interesting.

Senator Thune, America is watching. In case anyone has forgotten what the GOP ran on with all of the blame being thrown around by the media. I have a copy I keep to remind me. This is why I voted for Trump and the Republicans down ticket. It was never for their personalities, skin color, ethnic background, etc. It is to protect America, American citizens and future generations. God Bless America. Republican Platform SEAL THE BORDER, AND STOP THE MIGRANT INVASION CARRY OUT THE LARGEST DEPORTATION OPERATION IN AMERICAN HISTORY END INFLATION, AND MAKE AMERICA AFFORDABLE AGAIN MAKE AMERICA THE DOMINANT ENERGY PRODUCER IN THE WORLD, BY FAR! STOP OUTSOURCING, AND TURN THE UNITED STATES INTO A MANUFACTURING SUPERPOWER LARGE TAX CUTS FOR WORKERS, AND NO TAX ON TIPS! DEFEND OUR CONSTITUTION, OUR BILL OF RIGHTS, AND OUR FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS, INCLUDING FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM OF RELIGION, AND THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS PREVENT WORLD WAR THREE, RESTORE PEACE IN EUROPE AND IN THE MIDDLE EAST, AND BUILD A GREAT IRON DOME MISSILE DEFENSE SHIELD OVER OUR ENTIRE COUNTRY -- ALL MADE IN AMERICA END THE WEAPONIZATION OF GOVERNMENT AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE STOP THE MIGRANT CRIME EPIDEMIC, DEMOLISH THE FOREIGN DRUG CARTELS, CRUSH GANG VIOLENCE, AND LOCK UP VIOLENT OFFENDERS REBUILD OUR CITIES, INCLUDING WASHINGTON DC, MAKING THEM SAFE, CLEAN, AND BEAUTIFUL AGAIN. STRENGTHEN AND MODERNIZE OUR MILITARY, MAKING IT, WITHOUT QUESTION, THE STRONGEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD KEEP THE U.S. DOLLAR AS THE WORLD'S RESERVE CURRENCY FIGHT FOR AND PROTECT SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE WITH NO CUTS, INCLUDING NO CHANGES TO THE RETIREMENT AGE CANCEL THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE MANDATE AND CUT COSTLY AND BURDENSOME REGULATIONS CUT FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ANY SCHOOL PUSHING CRITICAL RACE THEORY, RADICAL GENDER IDEOLOGY, AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE RACIAL, SEXUAL, OR POLITICAL CONTENT ON OUR CHILDREN KEEP MEN OUT OF WOMEN'S SPORTS DEPORT PRO-HAMAS RADICALS AND MAKE OUR COLLEGE CAMPUSES SAFE AND PATRIOTIC AGAIN SECURE OUR ELECTIONS, INCLUDING SAME DAY VOTING, VOTER IDENTIFICATION, PAPER BALLOTS, AND PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP UNITE OUR COUNTRY BY BRINGING IT TO NEW AND RECORD LEVELS OF SUCCESS

The recent political conventions have left many questioning the maturity of some candidates. Donald Trump and J.D. Vance, in particular, have been criticized for their childish remarks and lack of inspiration. Trump's speech at the Republican convention was long and boring, offering no real inspiration for delegates. Vance, on the other hand, was busy cleaning up his previous remarks about his own party's candidate. On the other hand, the Democratic convention was a different story. It was a professional program that clearly outlined what Democrats stand for, and it inspired many to volunteer for the campaign. The highlight of the convention was the appearance of Michelle Obama, who left the audience with a memorable line about the job Trump is seeking. The contrast between the two conventions is clear. The R's convention was filled with negativity and lacked inspiration, while the D's convention was filled with positivity and inspiration. What do you think of the contrast between the two conventions? Do you think it will impact the outcome of the election?

Attention Political Watchers, 🚨 Biden Faces Setback as Manchin Gives Thumbs-Down, But Gains Renewed Backing from Clyburn! 🗳️ In a dramatic turn of events, Senator Joe Manchin has opposed a key proposal from President Biden, while Representative James Clyburn has stepped in with renewed support. What does this mean for Biden’s agenda and the political landscape? Dive into the details and share your thoughts! 💬🔍 #Biden #Politics #Manchin #Clyburn #GovernmentNews

House Republicans on the verge of clinching a majority in the next Congress are already taking a victory lap, but their expected slim margin and unruly nature could undercut their efforts to pass President-elect Donald Trump’s agenda. Party leaders, still bruised from infighting over the past two years that led to the ouster of the GOP speaker and embarrassing failed votes, say things will be different this time. The squabbles were exacerbated by the party’s historically small majority this Congress—now at 221 to 213 with one vacancy—and leaders now are bracing for a similarly narrow advantage next year. https://lnkd.in/gV_swh77