Elvis Kerebi’s Post

B2B | B2C | Design for AI | SaaS UX Engineer leveraging Design Strategy in designing Human-centered products that drive Business Goals.

2mo

⚠ ⚠ The Dangerous Assumption Every Designer Should Avoid ⚠ ⚠ Today was a critical moment in my design career. During a deep dive with the engineering team into a specific feature, I confronted a mistake that had been lurking in my process: assuming that a design flow from a well-known platform would automatically work for our product. This mindset, even when unconscious, has been more damaging than I realized. The belief that "If it works for this famous platform, it’ll work for us too" led me to skip essential steps, like auditing the flow for our unique needs. Instead of critically evaluating whether the design was right for our product, I replicated it without considering our specific technical or user requirements. What I failed to recognize was how different our product’s backend, user base, and objectives might be from those of the platforms I was emulating. More than once, I presented a design, only to face pushback from the team. My defense? “But this is how it’s done on this famous platform.” After closer examination though, I had to admit that just because it worked for them didn’t mean it would work for us. I was neglecting the core principle of UX design—crafting solutions tailored to our users and product, rather than simply following what's working for others. This realization was a wake-up call. It underscored the danger of letting the reputation of other platforms dictate my design decisions without proper scrutiny. I also saw how this mindset was causing friction within the team and slowing down our development. It was clear that my approach needed a serious evaluation. Here’s how I’m addressing this: Consciousness of Stakeholders: I’ve shifted my focus to involve all relevant stakeholders from the outset. Understanding their perspectives and needs ensures that the design aligns with broader objectives, not just my assumptions. Establishing Clear Communication: Open dialogue with the engineering team and other stakeholders is now a priority. Before starting on any design, I make sure we’re all aligned on the requirements and goals. This clarity helps identify what’s technically feasible and what best serves our product. Asking the Right Questions: Rather than assuming a design will work just because it’s working for others, I now ask detailed questions to see how it will fit into our system. I probe into data management, user interaction, and the specific needs our product has compared to others. Seeking Early Feedback: I’ve learned the value of sharing my progress early and often. This allows me to catch any issues or misalignments before too much work has been done. It’s not just about defending my ideas but collaborating to find the best solution for our product. Iterating Based on Feedback: My design process now includes more iterations based on feedback. This continuous refinement ensures that the final product is not only technically sound but also user-friendly and in line with our product vision.

1 Comment

Elvis Kerebi

B2B | B2C | Design for AI | SaaS UX Engineer leveraging Design Strategy in designing Human-centered products that drive Business Goals.

2mo

This journey has been a humbling one, but it’s been incredibly enlightening. UX design isn’t just about creativity or technical skills; it’s about collaboration, communication, and making informed decisions that are right for your product and users. So, the next time you’re tempted to copy a design from a renowned platform, pause and reflect. Make sure it truly fits your product’s needs. Engage your team early, and work together to create something that genuinely serves your users, and not just follows what works for others. #UXDesign #ProductDesign #DesignThinking #UserExperience #DesignStrategy #Collaboration #DesignProcess #UserCenteredDesign #DesignMindset #ProductDevelopment #DesignLeadership #UXEngineer #DesignSystems #StakeholderEngagement

To view or add a comment, sign in

More Relevant Posts

Pavel Samsonov

Design Lead @ AWS; Writer & speaker; Strategic UX, Product, Research, Innovation
9mo Edited
Report this post
Design is inextricably tied to its visuals. But we must never forget that the visuals exist to prop up the *process* - and when the process becomes secondary to the visuals, design risks falling into the form-factor trap where deliverables conceal sloppy thinking rather than improving it. The power of the design process is not in getting to "done" but in acquiring, ingesting, and processing information. Success is not necessary; even failure tells you more about the problem. The method to define the primary user benefit is no different - one of its most effective applications is to discover whether we have one defined in the first place. My series "Scaling the Design Ladder" continues with its second entry, introducing a new method that anyone in software can start practicing today. It's not "UX vs UI." It's not "designers fighting for the user." The purpose of the design process is simply to get everyone on the same page and pointed in the right direction - and the primary user benefit is a great place to start.

Design without process, or the form factor trap (Scaling the Design Ladder Part 2)

spavel.medium.com

7 Comments
Like Comment
To view or add a comment, sign in
Yakup Bayrak

I design systems.
4mo
Report this post
👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻 “ Design is all about well-orchestrated feedback loops. For different audiences — from customers and designers to developers and stakeholders. Cutting corners breaks these feedback loops. The result is poor inputs that lead to poor outcomes — often reversible, but sometimes damaging for years to come. Most importantly: calibrate expectations. We don’t know how our stakeholders work, so we shouldn’t expect that they know and understand design process. The more sincere and vulnerable you are, the more likely you are to get understanding and support, rather than fast turnaround requests.”
Vitaly Friedman Vitaly Friedman is an Influencer
4mo

Design Is Taking Too Long. When Can We Ship? (https://lnkd.in/eGeqRxd2), a very thoughtful overview of how to communicate and defend design process, and how to manage situations when you are expected to deliver faster — by visualizing your work and focusing on primary user benefits first. Neatly put together by Pavel Samsonov. 🤔 Final design hides the complexity of the work behind it. ✅ Design is hard to measure unless you focus on deliverables. ✅ So stakeholders track value in UX deliverables, not process. ✅ More final deliverables arrive faster → faster production time. 🚫 But value of design lies in the quality of the process behind it. ✅ Business value comes from user value, not the other way. ✅ Frame your design process as a way to maximize user value. ✅ Never present deliverables as “finished”: emphasize testing. ✅ Suggest uninterrupted times for hands-down design work. 🚫 No productivity optimization can automate user value. 🚫 There is no “later” phase to patch broken design work. ✅ Suggest to shift priorities or reduce the overall scope. ✅ Calibrate expectations: show what’s needed to be ready. ✅ Visualize the complexity of UX work with event storming. ✅ Report progress proactively: 2-mins videos, once a week. The most impactful ways to explain why design takes time is to visualize it. Not as abstract Double-Diamond or Triple-Diamond diagrams, but as messy, real-world sticky notes on a huge Miro or Figjam board (attached in the comments) — with all the pieces of work needed to get to final deliverables. As designers, we often get defensive, not showing the work until we feel that it’s in a good shape. But personally, I found it remarkably helpful to show design progress to stakeholders early and repeatedly. But: I would never ask for a personal opinion on design, but if they think it actually helps deliver user value. Design is all about well-orchestrated feedback loops. For different audiences — from customers and designers to developers and stakeholders. Cutting corners breaks these feedback loops. The result is poor inputs that lead to poor outcomes — often reversible, but sometimes damaging for years to come. Most importantly: calibrate expectations. We don’t know how our stakeholders work, so we shouldn’t expect that they know and understand design process. The more sincere and vulnerable you are, the more likely you are to get understanding and support, rather than fast turnaround requests. Useful resources: How To Increase Heads-Down Time To Design, by Sungjoon Steve Won https://lnkd.in/ewVnxwNb How Can You Find Time To Design?, by José Torre https://lnkd.in/dJrUfUEz Product Design: Too Much Work, Too Little Time, by Tess Gadd https://lnkd.in/e9RFYuCf [continues in comments] #ux #design
1 Comment
Like Comment
To view or add a comment, sign in
dr. bonnie lenore kyburz

Catalyzing Creative Vision 🔎 💎 📡 | Higher Education Professional Film Festival Professional | ALL THE THINGS!
4mo
Report this post
I could have used this guidance a few times! Here's a curated list of helpful ideas on defening your designs via Vitaly Friedman! #uxdesign
Vitaly Friedman Vitaly Friedman is an Influencer
4mo

Design Is Taking Too Long. When Can We Ship? (https://lnkd.in/eGeqRxd2), a very thoughtful overview of how to communicate and defend design process, and how to manage situations when you are expected to deliver faster — by visualizing your work and focusing on primary user benefits first. Neatly put together by Pavel Samsonov. 🤔 Final design hides the complexity of the work behind it. ✅ Design is hard to measure unless you focus on deliverables. ✅ So stakeholders track value in UX deliverables, not process. ✅ More final deliverables arrive faster → faster production time. 🚫 But value of design lies in the quality of the process behind it. ✅ Business value comes from user value, not the other way. ✅ Frame your design process as a way to maximize user value. ✅ Never present deliverables as “finished”: emphasize testing. ✅ Suggest uninterrupted times for hands-down design work. 🚫 No productivity optimization can automate user value. 🚫 There is no “later” phase to patch broken design work. ✅ Suggest to shift priorities or reduce the overall scope. ✅ Calibrate expectations: show what’s needed to be ready. ✅ Visualize the complexity of UX work with event storming. ✅ Report progress proactively: 2-mins videos, once a week. The most impactful ways to explain why design takes time is to visualize it. Not as abstract Double-Diamond or Triple-Diamond diagrams, but as messy, real-world sticky notes on a huge Miro or Figjam board (attached in the comments) — with all the pieces of work needed to get to final deliverables. As designers, we often get defensive, not showing the work until we feel that it’s in a good shape. But personally, I found it remarkably helpful to show design progress to stakeholders early and repeatedly. But: I would never ask for a personal opinion on design, but if they think it actually helps deliver user value. Design is all about well-orchestrated feedback loops. For different audiences — from customers and designers to developers and stakeholders. Cutting corners breaks these feedback loops. The result is poor inputs that lead to poor outcomes — often reversible, but sometimes damaging for years to come. Most importantly: calibrate expectations. We don’t know how our stakeholders work, so we shouldn’t expect that they know and understand design process. The more sincere and vulnerable you are, the more likely you are to get understanding and support, rather than fast turnaround requests. Useful resources: How To Increase Heads-Down Time To Design, by Sungjoon Steve Won https://lnkd.in/ewVnxwNb How Can You Find Time To Design?, by José Torre https://lnkd.in/dJrUfUEz Product Design: Too Much Work, Too Little Time, by Tess Gadd https://lnkd.in/e9RFYuCf [continues in comments] #ux #design
Like Comment
To view or add a comment, sign in
Jorge Armando Cabrera Herrera

Product Designer | UX/UI Designer | Visual Designer | Lead Designer at Domestika
4mo
Report this post
How to communicate and defend design process. As designers, we often get defensive, not showing the work until we feel that it’s in a good shape. But, it’s remarkably helpful to show design progress to stakeholders early and repeatedly. Design is all about well-orchestrated feedback loops. For different audiences — from customers and designers to developers and stakeholders. Cutting corners breaks these feedback loops.
Vitaly Friedman Vitaly Friedman is an Influencer
4mo

Design Is Taking Too Long. When Can We Ship? (https://lnkd.in/eGeqRxd2), a very thoughtful overview of how to communicate and defend design process, and how to manage situations when you are expected to deliver faster — by visualizing your work and focusing on primary user benefits first. Neatly put together by Pavel Samsonov. 🤔 Final design hides the complexity of the work behind it. ✅ Design is hard to measure unless you focus on deliverables. ✅ So stakeholders track value in UX deliverables, not process. ✅ More final deliverables arrive faster → faster production time. 🚫 But value of design lies in the quality of the process behind it. ✅ Business value comes from user value, not the other way. ✅ Frame your design process as a way to maximize user value. ✅ Never present deliverables as “finished”: emphasize testing. ✅ Suggest uninterrupted times for hands-down design work. 🚫 No productivity optimization can automate user value. 🚫 There is no “later” phase to patch broken design work. ✅ Suggest to shift priorities or reduce the overall scope. ✅ Calibrate expectations: show what’s needed to be ready. ✅ Visualize the complexity of UX work with event storming. ✅ Report progress proactively: 2-mins videos, once a week. The most impactful ways to explain why design takes time is to visualize it. Not as abstract Double-Diamond or Triple-Diamond diagrams, but as messy, real-world sticky notes on a huge Miro or Figjam board (attached in the comments) — with all the pieces of work needed to get to final deliverables. As designers, we often get defensive, not showing the work until we feel that it’s in a good shape. But personally, I found it remarkably helpful to show design progress to stakeholders early and repeatedly. But: I would never ask for a personal opinion on design, but if they think it actually helps deliver user value. Design is all about well-orchestrated feedback loops. For different audiences — from customers and designers to developers and stakeholders. Cutting corners breaks these feedback loops. The result is poor inputs that lead to poor outcomes — often reversible, but sometimes damaging for years to come. Most importantly: calibrate expectations. We don’t know how our stakeholders work, so we shouldn’t expect that they know and understand design process. The more sincere and vulnerable you are, the more likely you are to get understanding and support, rather than fast turnaround requests. Useful resources: How To Increase Heads-Down Time To Design, by Sungjoon Steve Won https://lnkd.in/ewVnxwNb How Can You Find Time To Design?, by José Torre https://lnkd.in/dJrUfUEz Product Design: Too Much Work, Too Little Time, by Tess Gadd https://lnkd.in/e9RFYuCf [continues in comments] #ux #design
Like Comment
To view or add a comment, sign in
Vitaly Friedman Vitaly Friedman is an Influencer
4mo
Report this post
Design Is Taking Too Long. When Can We Ship? (https://lnkd.in/eGeqRxd2), a very thoughtful overview of how to communicate and defend design process, and how to manage situations when you are expected to deliver faster — by visualizing your work and focusing on primary user benefits first. Neatly put together by Pavel Samsonov. 🤔 Final design hides the complexity of the work behind it. ✅ Design is hard to measure unless you focus on deliverables. ✅ So stakeholders track value in UX deliverables, not process. ✅ More final deliverables arrive faster → faster production time. 🚫 But value of design lies in the quality of the process behind it. ✅ Business value comes from user value, not the other way. ✅ Frame your design process as a way to maximize user value. ✅ Never present deliverables as “finished”: emphasize testing. ✅ Suggest uninterrupted times for hands-down design work. 🚫 No productivity optimization can automate user value. 🚫 There is no “later” phase to patch broken design work. ✅ Suggest to shift priorities or reduce the overall scope. ✅ Calibrate expectations: show what’s needed to be ready. ✅ Visualize the complexity of UX work with event storming. ✅ Report progress proactively: 2-mins videos, once a week. The most impactful ways to explain why design takes time is to visualize it. Not as abstract Double-Diamond or Triple-Diamond diagrams, but as messy, real-world sticky notes on a huge Miro or Figjam board (attached in the comments) — with all the pieces of work needed to get to final deliverables. As designers, we often get defensive, not showing the work until we feel that it’s in a good shape. But personally, I found it remarkably helpful to show design progress to stakeholders early and repeatedly. But: I would never ask for a personal opinion on design, but if they think it actually helps deliver user value. Design is all about well-orchestrated feedback loops. For different audiences — from customers and designers to developers and stakeholders. Cutting corners breaks these feedback loops. The result is poor inputs that lead to poor outcomes — often reversible, but sometimes damaging for years to come. Most importantly: calibrate expectations. We don’t know how our stakeholders work, so we shouldn’t expect that they know and understand design process. The more sincere and vulnerable you are, the more likely you are to get understanding and support, rather than fast turnaround requests. Useful resources: How To Increase Heads-Down Time To Design, by Sungjoon Steve Won https://lnkd.in/ewVnxwNb How Can You Find Time To Design?, by José Torre https://lnkd.in/dJrUfUEz Product Design: Too Much Work, Too Little Time, by Tess Gadd https://lnkd.in/e9RFYuCf [continues in comments] #ux #design
43 Comments
Like Comment
To view or add a comment, sign in
Todd Ziaja

Creative thinker, maker, and collaborateur.
4mo
Report this post
All of this. But key takeaways for me. Good design is invisible. Good Design is a business driver —both a weapon for growth and a mechanism for efficiency. Good design is worth the time.
Vitaly Friedman Vitaly Friedman is an Influencer
4mo

Design Is Taking Too Long. When Can We Ship? (https://lnkd.in/eGeqRxd2), a very thoughtful overview of how to communicate and defend design process, and how to manage situations when you are expected to deliver faster — by visualizing your work and focusing on primary user benefits first. Neatly put together by Pavel Samsonov. 🤔 Final design hides the complexity of the work behind it. ✅ Design is hard to measure unless you focus on deliverables. ✅ So stakeholders track value in UX deliverables, not process. ✅ More final deliverables arrive faster → faster production time. 🚫 But value of design lies in the quality of the process behind it. ✅ Business value comes from user value, not the other way. ✅ Frame your design process as a way to maximize user value. ✅ Never present deliverables as “finished”: emphasize testing. ✅ Suggest uninterrupted times for hands-down design work. 🚫 No productivity optimization can automate user value. 🚫 There is no “later” phase to patch broken design work. ✅ Suggest to shift priorities or reduce the overall scope. ✅ Calibrate expectations: show what’s needed to be ready. ✅ Visualize the complexity of UX work with event storming. ✅ Report progress proactively: 2-mins videos, once a week. The most impactful ways to explain why design takes time is to visualize it. Not as abstract Double-Diamond or Triple-Diamond diagrams, but as messy, real-world sticky notes on a huge Miro or Figjam board (attached in the comments) — with all the pieces of work needed to get to final deliverables. As designers, we often get defensive, not showing the work until we feel that it’s in a good shape. But personally, I found it remarkably helpful to show design progress to stakeholders early and repeatedly. But: I would never ask for a personal opinion on design, but if they think it actually helps deliver user value. Design is all about well-orchestrated feedback loops. For different audiences — from customers and designers to developers and stakeholders. Cutting corners breaks these feedback loops. The result is poor inputs that lead to poor outcomes — often reversible, but sometimes damaging for years to come. Most importantly: calibrate expectations. We don’t know how our stakeholders work, so we shouldn’t expect that they know and understand design process. The more sincere and vulnerable you are, the more likely you are to get understanding and support, rather than fast turnaround requests. Useful resources: How To Increase Heads-Down Time To Design, by Sungjoon Steve Won https://lnkd.in/ewVnxwNb How Can You Find Time To Design?, by José Torre https://lnkd.in/dJrUfUEz Product Design: Too Much Work, Too Little Time, by Tess Gadd https://lnkd.in/e9RFYuCf [continues in comments] #ux #design
Like Comment
To view or add a comment, sign in
Samin Yeaser Nuhas

Help Tech , SaaS or B2B Founders Win a Trustworthy Modern Logo Design
4mo
Report this post
The article really dives into the struggles of managing design processes and making their value clear. It highlights the importance of visualizing work, prioritizing user value, and regularly updating stakeholders on progress. The key takeaway is the need to understand stakeholder perspectives and prioritize maximizing user value.
Vitaly Friedman Vitaly Friedman is an Influencer
4mo

Design Is Taking Too Long. When Can We Ship? (https://lnkd.in/eGeqRxd2), a very thoughtful overview of how to communicate and defend design process, and how to manage situations when you are expected to deliver faster — by visualizing your work and focusing on primary user benefits first. Neatly put together by Pavel Samsonov. 🤔 Final design hides the complexity of the work behind it. ✅ Design is hard to measure unless you focus on deliverables. ✅ So stakeholders track value in UX deliverables, not process. ✅ More final deliverables arrive faster → faster production time. 🚫 But value of design lies in the quality of the process behind it. ✅ Business value comes from user value, not the other way. ✅ Frame your design process as a way to maximize user value. ✅ Never present deliverables as “finished”: emphasize testing. ✅ Suggest uninterrupted times for hands-down design work. 🚫 No productivity optimization can automate user value. 🚫 There is no “later” phase to patch broken design work. ✅ Suggest to shift priorities or reduce the overall scope. ✅ Calibrate expectations: show what’s needed to be ready. ✅ Visualize the complexity of UX work with event storming. ✅ Report progress proactively: 2-mins videos, once a week. The most impactful ways to explain why design takes time is to visualize it. Not as abstract Double-Diamond or Triple-Diamond diagrams, but as messy, real-world sticky notes on a huge Miro or Figjam board (attached in the comments) — with all the pieces of work needed to get to final deliverables. As designers, we often get defensive, not showing the work until we feel that it’s in a good shape. But personally, I found it remarkably helpful to show design progress to stakeholders early and repeatedly. But: I would never ask for a personal opinion on design, but if they think it actually helps deliver user value. Design is all about well-orchestrated feedback loops. For different audiences — from customers and designers to developers and stakeholders. Cutting corners breaks these feedback loops. The result is poor inputs that lead to poor outcomes — often reversible, but sometimes damaging for years to come. Most importantly: calibrate expectations. We don’t know how our stakeholders work, so we shouldn’t expect that they know and understand design process. The more sincere and vulnerable you are, the more likely you are to get understanding and support, rather than fast turnaround requests. Useful resources: How To Increase Heads-Down Time To Design, by Sungjoon Steve Won https://lnkd.in/ewVnxwNb How Can You Find Time To Design?, by José Torre https://lnkd.in/dJrUfUEz Product Design: Too Much Work, Too Little Time, by Tess Gadd https://lnkd.in/e9RFYuCf [continues in comments] #ux #design
Like Comment
To view or add a comment, sign in
Aleksandra S.

UX Designer | Psychology Enthusiast | I create interfaces for optimal experiences
5mo
Report this post
Full article 👉https://lnkd.in/ePTHRbY9 You spend countless hours crafting the perfect design – a masterpiece overflowing with intuitive features and stunning visuals. 🌟 Then, reality hits like a cold splash of water. Development throws a wrench in the plan, citing technical limitations or unforeseen complexities. Suddenly, your beautiful mockups face a brutal truth. They might need to be watered down or even scrapped altogether. This design-development disconnect doesn’t have to be the norm. In fact, it’s a scenario that can be significantly mitigated with a little foresight and proactive communication. The key to bridging the gap lies in establishing a common understanding of the project’s goals and technical realities from the outset. 1️⃣ Early Collaboration is Key. Don’t wait until the design is finalised to involve developers. Include them in the brainstorming process from the very beginning. This fosters open communication and allows developers to provide early feedback on the feasibility of design ideas. 2️⃣ Speak the Same Language. As a designer, it’s incredibly beneficial to equip yourself with a basic understanding of development terminology and principles. This doesn’t mean becoming a coding expert, but rather familiarizing yourself with common development constraints, frameworks, and libraries. 3️⃣ Embrace Modularity. Break down complex designs into reusable components. This “atomic design” approach simplifies the development process, reduces maintenance costs in the future, and ensures consistency across the interface. 4️⃣ Consider Accessibility. Accessibility is not an afterthought; it’s a core design principle. This eliminates the need for developers to retrofit accessibility features later in the development cycle, avoiding the need to rework code or redesign layouts. 5️⃣ Be mindful of Performance. Be mindful of how design choices might impact website loading times and responsiveness across devices. Faster applications are generally easier to debug. With a focus on performance in the design phase, there are fewer potential bottlenecks or slow-loading elements for developers to track down later. 👉 Remember, when both sides work together with a common understanding of goals and limitations, the result is a user experience that’s both beautiful and executable. #ux #uiux #uxdesign #dailyux #productdesign #designcommunity #userexperience #design #development

From Vision to Reality: Bridging the Gap Between Design and Development

https://aleksdailyux.blog

1 Comment
Like Comment
To view or add a comment, sign in
Aaron Lyndon

Product Enthusiast at keyzii - Connect, Share, Sign Documents, Get Paid - All in One Click!
7mo
Report this post
The Unforeseen Journey into Design: My Story with Keyzii As someone deeply entrenched in the entrepreneurial world, I've worn numerous hats, each bringing its unique challenges and learnings. However, one role I never anticipated falling in love with was that of a designer. This journey began not out of choice, but necessity. Each project, seven or more in count, nudged me closer to the realms of design, specifically the intricate dance of UI & UX that defines a product's soul. Design, I learned, is not just about aesthetics; it's about understanding the silent conversation between a user and a product. It's about anticipating needs, easing journeys, and crafting experiences that resonate. Through trial, error, and relentless learning, I've come to see design as a vital voice in the chorus of product development. Interestingly, my foray into design, and frankly, into many areas I currently navigate, comes without formal training or degrees. Yes, to those well-versed in each of these disciplines, my journey might seem like a tapestry of 'crinkles' yet to be ironed out. But therein lies a profound lesson: the importance of starting, of being bold enough to learn and grow under the watchful eyes of both critics and supporters. This openness to judgment and encouragement has been both a challenge and a catalyst for growth. This path led me to the latest chapter in my design story: the creation of Keyzii.com. Keyzii is more than just a website and product; it's a culmination of every lesson, every piece of feedback, and every insight gained on this unexpected journey in design. How did I do? This question isn't just about seeking validation but inviting you, the reader, to be a part of this ongoing journey. Visit Keyzii.com, and share your thoughts. How does the design speak to you? What does the UI/UX tell you about our mission and vision? Your feedback is not just appreciated; it's invaluable, as it shapes the path forward. In sharing this journey, I hope to not only offer insights into the evolution of Keyzii.com but to also inspire others to embrace the unexpected roles they might find themselves in. Design, after all, is not just about the end product but the journey of discovery, learning, and connecting with others. I look forward to your thoughts, critiques, and insights. Let's continue this conversation and grow together.
Like Comment
To view or add a comment, sign in
Rohan Ashik

Product Designer ✦ Specialized in Human Psychology and Gamification ✦ Author: The Gamification Playbook
5mo
Report this post
How Would Einstein Design a Product? Imagine stepping into Albert Einstein's shoes—not to solve a physics puzzle, but to design a product. Interesting, right? Use Einstein's method—inversion—to think creatively about product design. 🧐 Recognizing Problems as Opportunities: It's human nature to focus on the negative; we almost have a built-in ability to spot problems. If asked about issues in your life or work, answers might come out quickly. However, when asked to outline what's going well, the response might not be as quick or plentiful. This tendency towards the negative isn't just a personal habit—it's a powerful tool if used wisely. Let’s dive into how this can change product design. 🚫 Imagining the Worst to Achieve the Best: First, think about the absolute worst version of a product you could possibly create. Picture a product so full of issues it's set to fail. What features would it have? How would it frustrate users? Here’s what a nightmare product might include: - A very slow application. - Too many confusing options. - A long, complex signup process that turns away new users. - Inconsistent UI elements creating a messy user experience. - Fonts and sizes that change a lot, making the text hard to read. By listing these features, you're not just indulging in a negative fantasy. You're setting the stage for Einstein’s method of inversion. This approach involves flipping a problem on its head to find a solution, essentially thinking in reverse. 🔄 Applying Einstein's Inversion: Now, take each point of your "worst product" list and invert it: - Instead of a slow app, make it very fast. - Replace the mess of too many options with a sleek, simple interface offering just a few clear choices. - Make the signup process quick and simple. - Standardize UI elements to create a smooth and easy-to-use user experience. - Use a consistent font style and size to improve readability and look. 💭 Starting with Inversion: Incorporate this method at the beginning of your design process. By first building the worst version and then systematically reversing these elements, you ensure that the final product is not only free of major flaws but is optimized for a great user experience. 🔍 Einstein might not have been a product designer, but his methods for problem-solving are universally useful. Next time you’re tasked with designing a product, try this inversion technique. Imagine the worst, and then create the best. This method doesn't just solve problems—it innovates solutions. 📢 Are you ready to try this on your next product design? 🔗 Link: ♻️ Don’t forget to repost this for others.
1 Comment
Like Comment
To view or add a comment, sign in

1,896 followers

View Profile Follow

Elvis Kerebi’s Post

More from this author

Navigating Design Decisions: Balancing Brand Needs and User Experience

Explore topics