The first session of the 2024 Quizlet Unconference starts today at 12pm EST 💻 🙌 It's not too late to sign up! Don’t miss your chance to discover innovative ways to save time and increase student engagement in the classroom this year using Quizlet's latest features. Click the link below to register!
Quizlet’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
We are finishing February in a strong way with 9 classes in 3 days - how about you? Sing up here: https://lnkd.in/eUXTVT-R #alwayslearning #knowyourstuff #knowledgeispower
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
As you get closer to your exam day, no need to study the material you already know. Take quizzes targeting your weak areas to round out your knowledge!
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Level up your exam preparation with our latest video! 💡 - a must-watch for all candidates. Hit play and start learning now! 📘🎓 AVAILABLE on our youtube channel @thevetsnorth #ExamPrep #NewTutorial #StudyWithUs #TheVetsNorth
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Creative Lead @ CraneMorley | Leveraging Human Performance Improvement best practices to solve business problems. Blended learning instructional designer.
So: why might this course inspire enmity? Is it that we, sitting out of context, observe that "welcome" and "greet" could mean the same thing? Or is it that the feedback isn't sufficient enough to remind us of the nuances between "welcome" and "greet?" I imagine that the course discussed that nuance either in a long swath of bulleted text, or within some background VO for a video of smiling employees. But at the point in the course, the key element that is missing is the solid feedback reminding the learners of the difference between "welcome" and "greet." We snicker at the infinitesimal difference between "welcome" and "greet," maybe even respond with a well-placed The Office meme. But what's at the heart of this "hatred" of eLearning is that the feedback appears to chastise (we can't discern tone in text), rather than coach and explain the nuance the organization wishes were clear. Feedback is hard to do right in person. We should give it much more attention in our eLearning.
Assistant Director of Instructional Design at Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Author | Podcaster | Instructor | Public Speaker
“Our employees hate our courses and we don’t know why.” The course:
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Pictures are worth a thousand words, and even though this picture uses words to communicate, it completely illustrates why I got into instructional design. So much of employee training is "check the box" - questions to ensure that participants paid attention to the footnotes, but not ones that reinforced the key concepts. Training gets a bad rep because questions like the one below (and those "Did you read that parenthetical on slide 847?") are such a waste of time. But it doesn't need to be that way! As instructional designers, we must always approach our work with the learner in mind. Is it meaningful? Is it worth the learner's time? Does it reinforce the things that the learner likely didn't know coming into the training, but will need to know when exiting? Does it allow the learner to practice and assess their knowledge in the way they will use it? Or, is it just like the trainings you went through that you hated?
Assistant Director of Instructional Design at Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Author | Podcaster | Instructor | Public Speaker
“Our employees hate our courses and we don’t know why.” The course:
To view or add a comment, sign in
42,585 followers