Stakeholders want FDA to provide more clarity on its expectations for use-related risk analyses for “stand-alone” non-combination medical products. They also called for more alignment with the agency’s human factors guidance and ISO standards. Joanne Eglovitch reports in Regulatory Focus ✍️ https://bit.ly/3ZlS0Pi
Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society (RAPS)’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Check out our Q1 newsletter for an important notice from the FDA, AAOS highlights, and the Employee Spotlight on our Quality Supervisor, Michelle Yepes Mejia. Stay informed and ahead of the game with our quarterly roundup! #Q1Newsletter #Updates #FDA #AAOS2024 #EmployeeSpotlight
HIGHPOWER Headlines | Quarter 1 2024
myemail.constantcontact.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
A “Cliff’s Notes” version, to go with many other notes about how to implement ISO 13585 plus for LDTs.
The FDA has published a final guidance aimed at small entities that produce laboratory-developed tests. The agency published a final rule in April stating that it will phase out its regulatory discretion for LDTs, and the new guidance only solidifies that position but is much more concise. Ferdous Al-Faruque reports for Regulatory Focus: https://bit.ly/4bofh5o
FDA publishes LDT rule ‘CliffsNotes' in guidance for small companies
raps.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Driving innovation and excellence in 505 (B2) products and PBPK modelling . Ex- Dr. Reddys's, Ex-Intas, Ex-Glenmark Ex-Perrigo
Among FDA-regulated establishments and stakeholders, there is one word that makes everyone go on edge – the dreaded FDA "inspection." ✔ In an effort to clarify for industry and alleviate some of the stress associated with these activities, last week the FDA issued a draft guidance aimed at providing recommendations on how to handle inspections under FDA's Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) program. ✔ This draft guidance, titled "Processes and Practices Applicable to Bioresearch Monitoring Inspections," was prompted by a congressional directive under the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act and is intended to provide recommendations that are not otherwise specified in existing publicly available guides and manuals for such inspections (see pages 11-12 of the guidance for a list of these resources). ➡ It is critical that this guidance be reviewed in tandem with the guidance set forth in FDA's Investigations Operations Manual (IOM) and the Regulatory Procedures Manual (RPM), both of which provide more detail about how FDA investigators conduct investigations and make decisions about a firm's regulatory compliance. 💡 Comments on the draft guidance can be submitted to the docket by 5 August 2024. #FDA #BIMO #FDAInvestigation ~#FDAInspections
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
FDA Draft Guidance Updates Definitions and Standards for Postapproval Safety Data: The FDA has adopted an updated guidance from the International Council on Harmonisation (ICH) that provides clarification on how to factor in new and increasingly used data sources, such as social media or patient support programs, when reporting individual case safety reports postapproval. #fda #financial #lifesciences
FDA Draft Guidance Updates Definitions and Standards for Postapproval Safety Data
fdanews.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Did you miss our executive roundtable webinar earlier today on 'Navigating the FDA's Laboratory Developed Tests Regulation?' Good news. - The recording and slides will be emailed to everyone who registered! - The presentation will be available on demand via our website - We are still taking questions! Just a few hours ahead of our discussion, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) updated their status 'Final Rule' with a concluded date of April 22, 2024; so we are anticipating this to be published any day now. Should we do a part two after it's published? If so, anyone else we should invite to the conversation? Link to the on demand resources + OIRA update in the comments. #Diagnostics #LabDevelopedTests #FDA
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Last week the FDA issued new draft guidance for the #QSubmission. The revised guidance provides clearer information for manufacturers to determine when an informal communication is more appropriate than a full Q-Submission, gives further detail on Q-Submission types and also provides more details on #PMA Day-100 Meetings. Comments are open until 15 April 2024. Q-Subs are one of the most useful tools for an FDA submission, if used correctly. Our top tip is to have targeted questions prepared. https://lnkd.in/gJEa6RTp
Q-Submission Draft Guidance
fda.gov
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
LDTs, In house in vitro diagnostics under FDA..not only under the IVDR a new field!!! nice and clear article from Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society (RAPS) for better understanding!!
After years of jostling with industry, failed legislative efforts, and some false starts, the FDA has unveiled its plan to bring laboratory developed tests into its regulatory fold over the next four years. “Today, we’re taking an important step forward in assuring patients, providers, and the public have access to safe, effective tests that they can trust,” FDA Commissioner Robert Califf said during a press briefing. Regulatory Focus has the details: https://bit.ly/4aVmw5s
FDA issues long-awaited LDT final rule
raps.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Bottom line. If you are not including CODefs in your protocol and study report you’ll get asked for them. Contact myself and the team at Navidence to help you embed these in your RWE Design and RWD Assessment.
Are you routinely including CODefs (aka computable phenotypes) in your protocols and study reports? Can you generate them in a computable processable format? The FDA expects you to. Contact our experts at Navidence here https://hubs.ly/Q02JSlcY0 if you want to learn more about complying with the FDA Guidance below. Find the full FDA Guidance here: https://hubs.ly/Q02JSmpC0 #RWE #RWD
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The TMA panel "Common Goals: Improving Product Pathways & Regulations" sparked an open, insightful, and engaging dialogue on the pathways to market for nicotine products. Key positive takeaways: 1. The FDA CTP is considering how they can improve their processes. 2. The Office of Science should continue producing excellent research to provide direction. 3. The Substantial Equivalence (SE) pathway is working efficiently – it's easy, fast, and cost-effective. 4. There has been an uptick in enforcement, demonstrating the FDA's commitment to regulation. 5. The website on relative risk is a positive step towards educating the public. While progress is being made, there is still room for improvement. Closing panelist suggestions to the FDA CTP: 1. Trust your scientists – their expertise is invaluable. 2. Improve timelines to streamline the process. 3. Reprioritize to focus on the most critical aspects of regulation. By implementing these changes, we can work towards a more efficient and effective regulatory landscape for nicotine products. What are your thoughts on the current state of nicotine product regulation? Share your insights in the comments below! #TMA #NicotineRegulation #ProductPathways #FDAImprovement
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Join Louise Uí Fhatharta for our upcoming webinar on "Preparing for a Successful Inspection". Gain insights into best practices for preparing your organization for regulatory inspections and ensuring compliance. 📅 Date: May 16, 2024 🕒 Time: 3pm GMT In this session, you'll learn: ✅ Proactive approaches to inspections ✅ Identifying key elements of regulatory noncompliance ✅ Post-inspection activities and best practices Successful health authority inspections require preparation and communication. Learn how to navigate regulatory audits effectively and set your site up for success. Register now: 🔗 https://shorturl.at/bqBDH #Pharma #InspectionReadiness #RegulatoryCompliance
To view or add a comment, sign in
177,445 followers