Richard Kuchinsky’s Post

View profile for Richard Kuchinsky, graphic

Global Footwear Designer & Performance Running Expert

These aren't the shoes you think they are. In case you missed it, Tigist Assefa demolished the Women's Marathon record in Berlin, running 2:11:53 She did it wearing the adidas Adizero Adios Pro Evo 1 v2... A **heavier** version of the $500 "disposable" super shoe. The Evo 1 was recently announced as the world's lightest marathon shoe weighing just 138g: 40% lighter than competitors. This incredible weight reduction, was owed to to innovations including "liquid rubber" that I speculated could save 15-20g compared to a Nike Vaporfly's 25.1g of rubber. The world record worn v2 version apparently forgoes this outsole innovation for a more traditional Continental rubber outsole, suitable for "wet weather". So why did Assefa pick the heavier, traditional outsole over the new, lighter version on a dry day? Nobody (except adidas and her coach) knows. What is important, is that it shows that Experience over Specs is what matters. Was it confidence from a rubber compound that behaved more similar to what Assefa used in training? Was the grip of liquid rubber great in a lab and on asphalt, but a bit slippery on the painted lines that mark the course tangents? Did the rubber or added weight balance the shoe better provide a more planted feeling? Was it psychological racing in something more traditional? I don't know. But I trust the runner's decision and the performance proved it was the right one. As a runner and running shoe designer I can relate. It's why I always test running shoes myself. It's why I take lab tests with a grain of salt. It's why I see runners prefer and outperform in "technically" slower shoes in some cases. It's why I believe strongly that runners make better running shoe designers. Because runners understand that experience. Congrats Adidas and Assefa. This shoe and performance is not only good for the sport but good to shake up innovation across the industry. ----- For more commentary and content on running and running shoe design, follow me on LinkedIn, Subscribe to The Directive Collective newsletter and find me on Instagram. Design by Runners. For Runners. https://lnkd.in/gDKyWDbD #run #running #runner #footwear #footweardesign #footweardesigner #shoedesign #runningshoes

  • No alternative text description for this image
David Dellagiacoma

Aptera Pty Ltd | Manufacturing Engineering / Product Development / Technology / Operations Management

1y

Good article, Richard. Of course mass counts for an awful lot in a running shoe(!), but you've described great example of how easy it is to get fixated on maximising one design parameter - especially when it is a number and easy to measure. The best total of 'goodness' in a design often includes parameters that are more difficult to measure, or that aren't immediately apparent, or maybe even a little counter-intuitive.

Percy Smith

Is your marketing a pig? We'll make it fly.🚀 | Founder at Catalyst 🧡 | Content Marketing, Campaigns, and Creative Projects. 📈

1y

Saw this this month and was waiting for your take Richard😁

Benard Liu

I'm an engineer for sole moulds. I learned almost standards of sole mould such as famous RB Eva ip pu tpr pvc Etpu etc.

1y

138g magical

Leandro Estrada, Ph.D.

Technology Leader and Innovations Promoter | Solving problematic manufacturing processes by connecting users with the right technologies

1y

Bravo! - I love this post for several reasons. But, above them all, I love the fact that it highlights that UX is above initial design requirements. The main challenge is that the VoC is often translated to R&D/designers by internal intermediaries that often times reduce the fidelity of this voice and, in turn, provide misguidance. The complexity increases as the supply chain goes farther from the final application customer/user. Having both R&D and designer teams closer to the customer is paramount as the standard testing protocols are insufficient deciding factors against which to guide designs. Collaboration ethics should, one day (I hope), shorten the "need-to-know basis" gap for information sharing and permit more transparent collaborations for improved turn around, use of resources, and final product quality. We often talk about supply chain, but seldom discuss the importance of the communication chain, CTQ is not necessarily equivalent to CTC. Customer defines what quality should be. Period.

Like
Reply
Mathieu Vassal

Redefining Quality for Leather, Footwear & Apparels I VP@ Impactiva I Fashion & retail industry expert➤ We enhance Agility, Speed, Quality, Affordability & Sustainability in your Supply & Manufacturing Chains🚀

1y

congratulations adidas for pulling everyone to a higher level is this never ending road to betterment!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics