The IPCC exists to provide policy-relevant science to decision-makers. Often the most policy relevant information is uncertain. Over the last twenty-five years, the IPCC has drawn increasingly on DMDU concepts to more effectively include policy-relevant, but lower-confidence scientific information in its assessments. Our new paper – The Use of DMDU in the IPCC –describes how the IPCC has benefited from DMDU and how DMDU can contribute to the next IPCC assessment report. Judy Lawrence Marjolijn Haasnoot Bob Kopp Andy Reisinger Michael Grubb Roberto Pasqualino https://lnkd.in/gV_X2M7b
This goes straight to be printed for in depth reading - thanks for the post here!
The IPCC exists to fund and direct science that supports their agenda. How can anyone think that an organization that ows its existence to a perceived climate crisis is not utterly biased towards promoting a climate crisis?
Robert Lempert is it correct understanding that most part of Apocalyptic projections made by IPCC with „medium“ level of confidence (i.e. 33-66% likelihood of occurance) means complete uncertainty —> maybe YES / maybe NO?
Thank you for sharing!
Carlos Munoz-Pina
Adjunct Professor, Climate Change Research Institute, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington and Director PSConsulting Ltd
9moHannah Chorley Tim Naish Rob Bell Cushla Loomb