Last December, former President Joe Biden signed the fiscal year 2025 National Defense Authorization Act into law, including a provision that requires the U.S. Government Accountability Office to develop a proposal to apply enhanced pleading standards in protests challenging U.S. Department of Defense procurements. The new GAO pleading standards could change the calculus of whether protestors file with GAO or protest before the Court of Federal Claims instead. RJO shareholder Lucas Hanback and associate Timothy Wieroniey authored a Law360 article (subscription required) on how these new standards may change where protests are filed. In their article, “Anticipating How GAO Pleading Standards May Shift,” Hanback and Wieroniey analyze the current pleading standards and discuss GAO’s new mandate. They also explore bid protest strategies that government contractors may use moving forward. Read more about their article and view a pdf copy on our website: https://lnkd.in/gFaGCS3f
Rogers Joseph O'Donnell’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Interested in understanding the intricacies of a "Bid Protest" within federal contracting? Kelsey Bonner, CFE, of VERTEX, provides a comprehensive breakdown in her latest blog post. Bid protests serve a critical role in ensuring fairness and adherence to procurement regulations. Whether contesting contract awards or solicitation terms, grasping the fundamentals is essential. Protesters can leverage channels such as the Government Accountability Office (GAO) or U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC) to express their concerns. Moreover, bid protests extend beyond the federal level, encompassing state and local jurisdictions. Eager to delve deeper into GAO protest procedures? Explore Kelsey's insightful analysis for a thorough understanding of navigating bid protest intricacies. Click the link below to read the full blog. https://lnkd.in/efQmX37H #GovernmentContracting #BidProtest #Procurement #ExpertWitness #LitigationConsultants #WeAreVertex #VertexEng
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
BREAKING—MONUMENTAL RULING IMPACTING J6 DEFENDANTS: The Supreme Court just ruled that for someone to be charged with federal obstruction, their actions must specifically involve tampering with records or evidence used in official proceedings. NOTE: The decision affects cases like the January 6 Capitol protests, limiting the actions that can be prosecuted under the law. NOTE: The Court aims to prevent overly broad charges and ensure that only specific types of obstruction are punishable, protecting against excessive use of prosecutorial power. THREE KEY THINGS 1 - The ruling limits what can be considered obstruction. It's not enough to just disrupt an official process; the disruption must involve interfering with actual evidence or documents. 2- This decision directly affects cases related to the January 6 Capitol protests. It means that many people involved in the riot might not face federal obstruction charges unless their actions included tampering with evidence or records. 3- The ruling is intended to stop prosecutors from using the obstruction law too broadly. The Supreme Court wants to ensure that only specific, clearly defined actions can be punished under this law, preventing misuse of prosecutorial power.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
#Egypt: Judges' Protests and Subsequent Investigations Frustrated by the lack of response to their grievances, judges turned to private online forums to discuss the financial crisis and broader issues affecting the judiciary. These forums, strictly limited to members of the judiciary, became platforms for candid discussions. However, these discussions prompted the Judicial Inspection Authority, led by Chief Justice Wafae Abskharon and with approval from Justice Minister Adnan Fangari, to launch investigations into approximately 50 judges. These investigations have been widely criticized, with judges and legal experts accusing the ministry of infringing upon judicial independence. The judges facing investigation have refused to cooperate, labeling the process an overreach and a violation of their rights. They argue that their discussions were confined to private groups and did not involve any public dissent or political statements. Instead, these discussions were focused on internal judicial concerns, such as financial disparities and governance issues. This refusal to cooperate has escalated tensions, with judges calling for emergency general assemblies to discuss potential escalatory measures, including strikes or protests. Full details: https://lnkd.in/e4FSE8GC
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The renewed movement of 2024 may very well be a consequence of the government's failure to engage in comprehensive policy analysis and stakeholder consultation before abolishing the quota system in 2018. The decision aimed for immediate relief from protests, rather than long-term stability and justice. Here's my analysis on the matter. https://lnkd.in/gne4zPj6
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In a groundbreaking move, over 100 prisoners connected to the January 6 Capitol protests have united to launch a $50 billion class-action lawsuit against the Department of Justice, led by Jake Lang. This lawsuit, aiming to address what is described as a "two-tiered justice system," represents a significant legal challenge alleging biased targeting and inhumane treatment of January 6 participants. Scheduled for filing on an emblematic day—January 20, 2025, coinciding with President-elect Donald Trump's planned inauguration—the lawsuit underscores deep divisions over the events of that day and its aftermath. Critics argue that it reflects a broader issue of political persecution, while supporters see it as a step towards accountability. As this legal battle looms, it promises to stir national debate and scrutiny over justice and political bias in the United States. #JusticeSystem #January6 #LegalNews #PoliticalDebate https://lnkd.in/euGtBpa9
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Georgia's spirit of resilience is once again on full display as protests reignite against the 'foreign agents' bill! Despite government expectations, the people's determination remains unyielding, echoing their strong desire for democratic values and European integration. Last year's government retreat may have been a calculated move, hoping that time would erode public opposition, a common complacency tactic employed by authorities. Yet, Georgian citizens have proven otherwise, standing firm in their conviction even in the face of repeated challenges. It's a testament to our collective strength and our refusal to succumb to such tactics. With both the EU and US expressing concerns about the bill, it’s clear that our aspirations for euro-Atlantic integration are at risk. We stand together in this pivotal moment for our nation’s future.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Aron Beezley and Nathaniel Greeson explore New Jersey’s bid protest procedures, detailing key rules for pre- and post-award protests, filing deadlines, discovery procedures, and potential hearings. This post continues their ongoing survey of state-level bid protest processes on our BuildSmart blog, offering a comprehensive overview of New Jersey’s process for vendors challenging procurement decisions. [https://lnkd.in/eaSYNvvf]
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The GSA Polaris IT contract is now facing seven protests, with companies challenging how proposals were evaluated, including scoring past experience and project credits. These disputes highlight ongoing concerns over fairness in federal contract awards. Learn more from Washington Technology. https://bit.ly/40kI5YY #GovCon #FederalContracts #ITProcurement
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🛡️ Balancing Rights & Security 🛡️ Free speech is essential, but ensuring public safety during protests can be complex—especially in times of political tension. Our upcoming webinar on September 25th will cover lessons learned from recent events and provide practical strategies for law enforcement and policymakers. 📢 Register now and stay informed! https://lnkd.in/gXcayQAu #ProtestManagement #PublicSafety #LawEnforcement #CommunitySafety #PoliticalTensions
To view or add a comment, sign in