Are you sure you only want to consider in-house roles? At least 15% of the junior to mid-level attorneys (2-5 years experience) who reach out to me for assistance only want to consider in-house opportunities. While I can understand the desire for a different work environment, choosing the right time to make that move is crucial for longterm career development. The sweet spot for moving in house is usually after 6+ years' experience ON AVERAGE. In-house, you're not generating profit for the company while getting trained on how to be a lawyer; you're a cost center meant to share your expertise and provide answers to tough questions. Certainly, there are some more junior in-house roles out there, but these can often be likened to "alternative track" law firm roles: less sophisticated work, fewer resources (if any) for training and development, and lack a pathway for advancement in the organization. It can be more advantageous to make a move to another law firm that can offer you the right training to be part of those strategic advising conversations, to get exposure directly with clients, and to act as lead associate on your matters. Then you'll have the skills you need to hit the ground running and actually be successful in your dream in-house role. Not to mention, being at a strong firm can offer built-in exit opportunities with its clients, if you are there long enough and in a position on the firm team to make a personal impression. It is better to build your resume toward the goal of a successful and strategic move in-house, rather than desperately pulling the escape lever as soon as possible. In-house attorneys: do you agree with these considerations? What would you add or change? #inhousecounsel #inhouselegal #lawfirmlife #lawjobs #jobchange #lawyerlife #legalrecruitment
Also at least as far as I know, part time options aren’t generally available in house, whereas we see this increasingly with firms.
I agree they need more experience, but disagree that "you're a cost center meant to share your expertise and provide answers to tough questions." If the company views the in-house role as expensive back office, they are already in trouble. Great GCs add tremendous value because they dive into operations and learn the business. Then they use their legal experience to figure out how to solve the business problems and deliver shareholder value. Results matter.
Patent Counsel at Align Technology
8moI think you're right--there's generally a larger range of opportunities when you're at around 6 years, since you can apply for the 3+ jobs and for the 6+ jobs. I'll add though that you don't want to wait too long. At some point, many of those job openings will have a "previous in-house experience STRONGLY preferred" tag on them. And that can be an uphill battle.