I typically I look at history for lessons on leadership. The past gives us more wholistic insights on the people, their circumstances, actions and outcomes, than the present. I just read (tried to finish it by July 4th) 1776 by David McCullough (https://lnkd.in/gTW8fw6m), one of my favorite authors along with Malcolm Gladwell and Ken Follett. The book, a historical account, tells a vivid story of the American Revolution. This note captures my assessment on the leadership disposition and the role George Washington played in leading the Continental Army during the trying fall & winter days of 1776. So what made him an effective leader after his appointment on June 19th, 1775.
Let's start with what Washington did not do well. He was not a great orator (though he often addressed his troops), nor was he a great war tactician (he often divided his forces). At times he was indecisive and led to dire consequences as in the case of Fort Washignton surrender. While an experienced soldier, he struggled to manage at scale and lead the poorly outfitted & disciplined volunteer militia. But his strengths overcame his weaknesses ...
Washington excelled in people judgement (promoted Knox and Greene, fended off Lee), and had the EQ required to bring together the Yankee (most of his volunteers were from New England) spirit and his Southern values. He handled himself well under pressure even when running from an engagement with a superior, more organised adversary. The battle of Brooklyn Heights could have been the end of the rebellion. Throughout the war, Washington's character was never in question. He didn't blamed his subordinates in failure, in most cases kept his disappointments to himself and praised generously displays of courage. Keeping an inexperienced army together was a massive undertaking for any experienced leader, but Washington gained the respect of his troops by leading them from the front in several engagements with the enemy. Lastly, he build support beyond his leadership team, communicated often with Congress and sought feedback and support for his actions.
My main takeaway is that you don't have to be perfect, but your areas of strength have to be meaningful (e.g. integrity, courage, grit) and savvy enough complement yourself with other leaders' skill, and motivation.
#leadership #lessons
Head of Product Development & Regulatory Consulting, Principal Consultant at Scendea
2moWow! KC meets CC. Great tie choice CC and great accomplishment Scendea!