Sovereign Strategy’s Post

Interesting analysis of the challenges and ever-changing U.S. foreign policy. Often, these changes go unnoticed. However, their impact can reverberate for years to come. Regardless of the outcome or which party occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, a cohesive and sensible strategy is always needed. https://lnkd.in/dSfEu9ey

In an increasingly multipolar world, traditional foreign policy approaches are evolving. In his latest article for our Europe Programme, analyst Charles Bauman explores how Labour, under Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Foreign Secretary David Lammy, is adopting Progressive Realism to navigate global complexities. Bauman explores how this framework combines the pragmatic elements of realism—such as national interest and power—with progressive goals like global stability, environmental sustainability, and human rights. He also discusses how this approach is influencing the UK’s engagement with key partners, such as the European Union and the Middle East, and shaping responses to global challenges in an increasingly multipolar world. Read more on how Progressive Realism is guiding Labour’s foreign policy vision 🇬🇧 🔗 https://lnkd.in/eZX2Wyv3 #UKPolitics #ForeignPolicy #ProgressiveRealism #GlobalGovernance #politicalrisk

🌍Progressive Realism, a new foreign policy paradigm, or more of the same? In my latest article, I examine the Labour Party’s foreign policy approach under Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Foreign Secretary David Lammy. The progressive Realism framework balances national interests with global cooperation, focusing on environmental sustainability, human rights, and multilateral engagement. The article explores how this policy influences Labour’s international relations, including renewed cooperation with the EU, strategic partnerships with the U.S., and the response to global challenges like climate change. However, some critics argue that this outlook is not new but rather a continuation of previous Government's foreign policies. For those interested in the intersection of national interest and global responsibility, I invite you to read and share your insights. #ForeignPolicy #LabourParty #ProgressiveRealism #UKPolitics #GlobalDiplomacy

For those interested in EU foreign policy, our (together with John Galariotis) new publication on EU foreign policy differentiation (with evidence from the UN General Assembly) has been published in the European Journal of Political Research (EJPR). In it, we test structural (size and economic power), institutional (Council presidency), political (UNSC membership or aspirations for it) and thematic drivers of member-states' differentiation from the official EU stance. The first and fourth set of drivers are the most prominent ones with weaker evidence regarding the second and third group. https://lnkd.in/dc-rtJNU

A very good read: “With a general election imminent, it is already clear that the next UK government will take office in an immensely challenging environment for foreign policy. From wars in Gaza and Ukraine to concerns about climate change, China’s assertive global agenda and the durability of America’s commitment to European security, the next UK government will face many pressing international problems and have limited resources with which to tackle them. This paper examines how the next government – regardless of which party wins the election – could use its foreign policy assets to best effect in the context of fiscal and other capacity pressures.” https://lnkd.in/eZZVCFg8

What strategy should a new government pursue to respond to #Britain's weakening position in the world? Watch my SOAS lecture on 'Re-thinking British foreign policy' for the answers (link to the full text available if you open the blurb below): https://lnkd.in/eajg5w9b

All this talk of New Zealand having an independent foreign policy belies the reality. Here's "How NZ can truly be independent in foreign policy" https://lnkd.in/gzpRZGwC

With a UK general election coming this year, and the polls being as they are, there are a lot of questions about what a Labour Government will mean for the development, foreign policy and climate diplomacy and financing sectors - the focus of much of Trio's recent work. A key question is whether we will see the return of the Department for International Development as an independent department with a Secretary of State who attends Cabinet. Labour has not committed either way but there has been reference of a new 'development agency' - making this paper on the various options for Whitehall structures for international development from Center for Global Development last week particularly relevant. As the paper points out, the right model is the one that promises to deliver on the Government's specific objectives and strategy for development and related areas. The Labour Party has promised a review of foreign, defence and development policy if it wins the election. As the paper recognises, a lot has changed since DFID was created in 1997 and some are predicting that 2024 will be a crunch year for the sector with the converging impact of declining bilateral budgets, a growing role for philanthropy, attempts to realise localisation, geopolitical shifts and increasing interest in the role of multilateral development banks. Any new structures need to reflect that change and for the UK to resume leadership in this area they will need to be at the forefront of that change. Do get in touch if you would like to hear more about our work in this area and on the general election. #internationaldevelopment #foreignpolicy #labourparty

Three insights from Foreign Policy article that resonate with thoughts for a #FreeAndOpenIndoPacific 🔗 https://lnkd.in/evWnbRxH? - Embracing the Markets - Avoiding Foreign Policy quicksands - Well-trained professional diplomats On third insight, even the “Strategic Seaman” can make a positive difference while on Liberty https://archive.ph/IIWU0