We’re proud to announce we have successfully completed our annual NICEIC audit. This demonstrates compliance with industry standards and regulations, ensuring our installations are safe and of high quality. Moreover, it reflects your commitment to excellence and professionalism in electrical building services.
T4 Mechanical and Electrical Ltd’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Well said Onur Sönmez! A major subject that is driving the fire safety standards in middle east and unfortunately in many cases missleading towards the EN offerings. I encourage anyone intrested to know more about fire safety standards and how Bosch complies and stand on top of the VDS certified products, to watch the below video and reachout for more questions or/and clarifications. We lead with quality and we proudly serve like a bosch! #vds #firesafety #lifesafety #UL #NFPA #EN54 #bosch_fire_alarm_system
Wondering how EN solutions are making headway in UL-EN mixed markets? Or how VdS certified products comply with requirements? Join our experts as they clarify existing misconceptions surrounding NFPA 72 specifications, specifically how stakeholders can embrace EN solutions for NFPA 72 specified tenders. Moreover, learn more about laboratories such as VdS and testing processes in the fire detection market. Finally, discover the unique features and services of Bosch VdS-certified products. Ready to dive deeper into this insightful discussion? Explore more in our latest video where Bosch and VdS experts discuss the ins and outs of fire safety standards in mixed markets. Thank you to Dr. Florian Scharr, Onur Sönmez and Martina Kolfenbach-Matthijsen for the interview and valuable insights!
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
👀 Understanding and utilizing the results of Environmental Monitoring is pivotal for a robust Contamination Control Strategy (CCS). Here's a concise overview to consider: Sources of Contamination: ⭕ Design, equipment, and service issues. ⭕ Inadequate monitoring and control systems. ⭕ Insufficient calibration, maintenance, and qualification plans. ⭕ Limited control tools for starting materials. ⭕ Inadequate personnel management. ⭕ Deficient process design. ⭕ Insufficient cleaning and disinfection systems. ⭕ Ineffective sterilization processes. ⭕ Poor management of quality events. 💡 A robust Environmental Monitoring strategy is crucial for early trend detection, saving time, and gaining valuable insights. This empowers decision-making for continual improvement in the daily operations of technical professionals. Learn more 👉 https://bit.ly/3TSsmyL
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Vice President Global Business Development. Industrial Services, Oil Flushing, Hydrolazing, Steamblowing, Chemical Cleaning, Pigging, Degreasing, plus more
ICCI's recent wins of two significant projects marks a remarkable achievement in the field of industrial cleaning and maintenance. The first project, focusing on precommission services in Southeast Texas, will utilize ICCI's core technologies such as Nautilus Hydrolazing, Chemical Cleaning, RAPID Lube Oil Flushing, and Steam Blowing. These advanced techniques are designed to ensure the highest standards of cleanliness and operational efficiency, crucial for the successful commissioning of new facilities. The second project involves our state-of-the-art maintenance support in the Baton Rouge area during a major turnaround. ICCI's expertise in this domain is set to provide comprehensive maintenance solutions that can significantly reduce downtime and enhance the overall productivity of the facilities involved. These projects not only reinforce ICCI's position as a leader in industrial services but also demonstrate the trust and confidence that the industry places in our specialized capabilities. The successful execution of these projects will likely pave the way for future opportunities and collaborations, further solidifying ICCI's reputation for excellence.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Senior Manager - Projects & Strategy, at Tata Chemicals Ltd l MBA- Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies I Member of Executive committee IIChe PRC
EPSC Human Performance Work group had studied and collected 50 useful practices to prevent Process safety incidents coz of Human error. Do you know that, Human error is one of the most frequent causes of Process safety incidents (PSI)? Statistics says that, >50% of PSI is contributed by Human error and organisational error <50% of PSI is contributed by Design issues, Asset Integrity The root causes can be drilled down to following 1. The person 2. The Organisation of work 3. The technical condition of plant and machine 4. The design of plant and machine Here is the collection of useful practices sorted by type of equipment and incidents 1. Flange leak 2. Wrong equipment (opened) 3. Wrong material 4. Valve position 5. Avoiding breaking of nozzles 6. Hose issues 7. Interlock issues 8. Organizational practices 9. Loading and unloading issues 10. Competency related 11. Plant isolation issues 12. Avoiding overfills 13. Avoiding equipments that invite human error I am sure these useful practices will help us to avoid the human error in our Industries Credits: EPSC Human Performance work group
Energy Transition | Automation | Control | Optimization | Measurement | Analytics | Process/Functional Safety | ICS Security | Digitalization | Sustainability | Costs Optimization | Reliability | Technology | Innovation
𝗕𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗦𝗮𝗳𝗲𝘁𝘆 𝗜𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 (𝗣𝗦𝗜) 𝗣𝗦𝗜𝘀 𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗨𝘀𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗣𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗱 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿𝘀 Over a period of two years (2018 - 2020), a Working Group from the European Process Safety Centre (EPSC) developed a set of around 50 useful practices to prevent process safety incidents (PSI) based in human error. Useful practices to avoid human error target the following: ✷ the Organization of work ✷ the Automation ✷ the Technical condition of plant and equipment ✷ the Design of plant and equipment The practices have been structured in chapters related to types of incidents or equipment. ✷ Valve position ✷ Flange leak ✷ Avoidingoverfills ✷ Avoiding breaking off small nozzles ✷ Wrong equipment (opened) ✷ Avoiding equipments which invite human error ✷ Wrong material or chemical ✷ Hose issues ✷ Plant isolation issues ✷ Interlock issues ✷ Loading, unloading ✷ Organisational practices ✷ Competency related Credits: EPSC Human Performance Work Group ------ 📣 Remember follow me David De Sousa De Sousa to be aware of content like this 🛎️ Activate the Bell to stay Up-to-date and catch all New & Relevant Posts ------
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Head of Sales & Marketing AP | Self Claim Photographer | Basketball player | IT Gadget Geek | Motorbiker | Nickname “Fireman”
Great information for those whose wanted to know more about EN54 regulations & NFPA72 standards This has been the topic constantly throughout my career in the Fire Detection business. Please share this among your peers who want to know more!
Wondering how EN solutions are making headway in UL-EN mixed markets? Or how VdS certified products comply with requirements? Join our experts as they clarify existing misconceptions surrounding NFPA 72 specifications, specifically how stakeholders can embrace EN solutions for NFPA 72 specified tenders. Moreover, learn more about laboratories such as VdS and testing processes in the fire detection market. Finally, discover the unique features and services of Bosch VdS-certified products. Ready to dive deeper into this insightful discussion? Explore more in our latest video where Bosch and VdS experts discuss the ins and outs of fire safety standards in mixed markets. Thank you to Dr. Florian Scharr, Onur Sönmez and Martina Kolfenbach-Matthijsen for the interview and valuable insights!
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Hey all! Is it time for your COR audit? I have some availability! Contact me and we can talk! Alternatively, if you are preparing for your first COR audit, I can help get you organized and ready! Avoid the fall-yearend rush! Let’s get this done! Feel free to share my contact information with your peers! #safetyaudits #CORaudits #safetymanagementsystems #safety #constructionsafety #oilfieldsafety #utilitysafety #environmentalsafety
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
My personal half time summary of todays BSR Conference Gateway Document Templates - They are not sure what they want - so don’t expect any further guidance soon. The documents will be more used to review the root cause when something is built wrong than anything else. Competence - Industry need to work out their own badges and accreditations ala RIBA for PD’s. In the meantime use the PAS standards for PD & PC plus qualifications and relevant experience. Gateway 1 - even if you pass this check the “part 2” response the HSE give to the planners, this will give you guidance and “recommendations” to head of issues that may arise at Gateway 2.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
What is a technical audit? 🆆🅷🅰🆃 🅸🆂 🅰 🆃🅴🅲🅷🅽🅸🅲🅰🅻 🅰🆄🅳🅸🆃 ?? A technical audit is a detailed evaluation of your new supplier’s capabilities and capacities. It gives you extensive visibility of how well the factory will be able to meet your requirements in terms of production and quality, and reveals how proactively the factory manages these aspects. Findings from the audit will help you to make an informed decision about whether to place an order, and to understand the level of risk associated with this production.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝐅𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐀𝐂𝐂𝐄𝐏𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐓𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 (𝐅𝐀𝐓): • FAT is typically conducted at the manufacturer's facility or factory before the equipment or system is shipped to the project site. • It is performed to verify that the equipment or system functions correctly and meets the design specifications and contractual requirements. • FAT is often carried out in the presence of the project owner or their representative, along with the contractor or project team. • During FAT, various tests and inspections are performed to simulate real-world operating conditions, and any identified issues or deficiencies are addressed and rectified by the manufacturer. • The objective of FAT is to ensure that the equipment or system is ready for installation and performs as expected before it is transported to the project site. 𝐒𝐈𝐓𝐄 𝐀𝐂𝐂𝐄𝐏𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐓𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 (𝐒𝐀𝐓): • SAT takes place at the project site after the equipment or system has been installed and assembled. • It is conducted to validate that the equipment or system functions correctly within its intended environment and meets the project requirements. • SAT is typically carried out by the project owner or their representative, often in the presence of the contractor or project team. • During SAT, the equipment or system is tested under actual operating conditions to verify its performance, functionality, and integration with other components or systems. • Any deficiencies or non-compliance identified during SAT are noted, and the contractor or project team is responsible for resolving them before the final acceptance of the project.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
TAKE CONTROL of ARC FLASH! Electrical Safety Specialist, Management Consultant - helping employers take control of electrical hazard management with validated residual risk at TW Becker Electrical Safety Consulting Inc.
Looking forward to this webinar discussing NFPA 70B, Electric Maintenance Program (EMP) framework/table of contents, risk assessment process used against your defined electrical equipment asset list to make decisions. Of course discuss “Maintenance for Safety, Electric Shock and Abnormal Arcing Fault/ Arc Flash.”
📢 Join us for a must-attend webinar on "Critical Updates to NFPA 70B: Enhancing Your Electrical Maintenance Program" with electrical safety expert Terry Becker, P.Eng., CESCP, IEEE Senior Member! Get insights on the latest NFPA 70B updates, risk assessment strategies, and more. Don't miss out—register now! 🔗 https://lnkd.in/gSXF-R-X
To view or add a comment, sign in
3,838 followers