Tamim Tasdik’s Post

The Court of Appeal has dismissed Shamima Begum's appeal against the Special Immigration Appeals Commission's decision. RDSBL's Qudsia Mirza, Senior Lecturer in Law provides insights into the latest ruling and its implications in writing for Solicitors Journal. Read the article here: https://bit.ly/3xpeh2L #RDSBLNews #ShamimaBegum #CourtOfAppeal #ImmigrationLaw

𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧 𝐮𝐧𝐟𝐚𝐯𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐢𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞? You have options! File a motion to reopen if you have new evidence or a motion to reconsider based on an USCIS error or incorrect application of a law or a policy. At Raju Law, we specialize in turning setbacks into victories. Contact us to explore your options and ensure your case is thoroughly reviewed. #ImmigrationLaw #LegalHelp #RajuLaw

Great decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Wilkinson v. Garland, Attorney General! In short, the question before the Court was whether an Immigration Judge's hardship determination was reviewable under §1252(a)(2)(D), which allows judicial review of “questions of law.” Several U.S. Court of Appeals had held it was not, foreclosing judicial review. The application of the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship legal standard to an established set of facts is a quintessential mixed question of law and fact. Mixed questions of law and fact have long been held to be reviewable under §1252(a)(2)(D). You can read the decision at https://lnkd.in/enxwpN-m.

If you receive a negative immigration decision after filing a writ of mandamus, such as your petition being denied, you may be able to appeal. Your attorney can guide you through the appeal process and help determine what steps to take next. Read more from Warren Law Firm at: https://buff.ly/3pDrrBz #WritOfMandamus #ImmigrationLaw

Fairness in Hearings and Marriages of Durable Partners: A Legal Update The Upper Tribunal's recent decision in the case of Elais (fairness and extended family members) UKUT 00300 has established important legal principles concerning the fairness of court hearings and the treatment of durable partners who marry after the Brexit implementation period. Key Points: Fairness in Hearings: Judges must ensure cross-examinations are conducted fairly, without undue interruptions. Availability of transcripts or recordings further supports the fairness of proceedings. Extended Family Members: Marriages occurring after the implementation period can be considered as evidence of relationship durability in appeals but do not constitute a "new matter" under the 2016 Regulations. This ruling provides crucial guidance on maintaining procedural fairness and clarifies how post-Brexit marriages are handled in the context of European immigration rules. Read More: https://lnkd.in/euz7JgXu #LegalUpdate #ImmigrationLaw #FairnessInHearings #EUSettlementScheme

My latest article! 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦

The current #immigration court system presents challenges to efficiency and fairness. Implementing an Article I court addresses these concerns. In her capacity as President of the National Association of Immigration Judges, Judge Mimi Tsankov shared in an #AILALawJournal article why an independent #immigration court system would allow the courts to be more effective and efficient. HEAR more on #ThinkImmigration: https://bit.ly/46Y060w

Wishing the entire Nexus Law Family a blessed and joyous Jumma Mubarak! Let this sacred day bring you peace, happiness, and countless blessings. Jumma Mubarak to all! 🤲 Reach out to us today for expert immigration guidance 📌 thenexuslaw.com 📞 +92 308 4222 315 | +92 308 4222 316 📧 info@thenexuslaw.com #JummaMubarak #NexusLawFamily #VisaPartner #TrustTheProcess 🕌

Update: Last night, following the SCOTUS ruling, the 5th Circuit "dissolved" the administrative stay (which SCOTUS found "odd"), so the injunction is back in effect until a panel of 5th Circuit judges rule today. This "chaos" as Justice Sotomayor characterized it, is not how government is supposed to work. ----- Is this the end of plenary power? Are states now left to independently enact laws that apply to immigrants? To risk US foreign policy? This is a very big change in US law, in the balance of power between branches of government, and perhaps most importantly, in federalism and prioritizing the union of the states.