For everyone who wanted to carry a handbag, would it be sensible to insist everyone gets a brand name? Why then, do we insist that all people who have borderline personality disorder be treated with DBT, MBT, TFP, or SFT, no matter what level of care, stage of illness, prior treatment, healthcare system, socioeconomic position, or developmental/life context? These specialized brands of treatment have innovated the design of good care for BPD, but there is not enough evidence that any brand name is superior to other manualized, informed, and structured approach to BPD delivered by providers who want to help, can be empathic or not stigmatizing towards people with the disorder, and can deliver generic principles of good care. Brands are not public health solutions and should be reserved for particular scenarios- we need more research on stepped care to understand how.
There are so many people with BPD seeking support, there is room for both brand name and generic treatments. Furthermore, there are many healthcare professionals who want to be more helpful but cannot implement a brand name therapy in the work they do. Generic versions provide the basic effective ingredient of good care for BPD, for mass consumption. Good psychiatric management needs no brand, and is a generic variant of informed, structured, but flexible and pragmatic good care for BPD. But like tissue or detergent, there are many generic variants that work (e.g., SCM, GIT-PD).
This Friday, I will give a talk inspired by this paper, Disruptive Innovations: Debranding Treatments for BPD at DBT Sverige, (in Sweden) virtually. Thanks to Sophie Liljedahl for the invitation and 90 minutes to get through my overflowing deck of animated slides...
#goodpsychiatricmanagement
#GPM
Financial Services Representative | President of Snowy Elk Coffee Co. | Driven Strategic Leader | Influencer | Author | Business Consultant | Expert in Team Building & Operational Excellence
3moThe Impact of Mass-Produced Food on Mental Health Recent studies by the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Naturopathic Association highlight the severe impact of mass-produced food on mental health. While physical health issues are a concern, the root cause often lies in metabolic dysfunctions triggered by carbohydrate toxicity and nutrient deficiencies, which also significantly affect mental well-being. The AMA reports that poor dietary habits contribute to metabolic issues, leading to increased mental health problems such as depression and anxiety. The Naturopathic Association emphasizes that processed carbohydrates disrupt metabolic processes, exacerbating mental health conditions. Moreover, a diet lacking essential nutrients weakens brain function, making the mind more susceptible to stress and mental illnesses. This toxic combination underscores the need for a shift towards whole, nutrient-dense foods to improve overall mental health. At least this is my opinion.