The Economist’s Post

View organization page for The Economist, graphic

13,040,538 followers

The approach was fun, but has fallen out of favour https://lnkd.in/e9T9-5UD

Why “Freakonomics” failed to transform economics

Why “Freakonomics” failed to transform economics

economist.com

Sidney Maradan

Project Manager - Confidential Company

3mo

What a question! “Freakonomics,” of course it failed to transform emerging economies and countries to step up to become a progressive economy, because of the following reasons such as: Well! First of all, the author of “Freakonomics,” are not real economists and no experience or concrete studies of how each individual countries operate, their culture, their ability to accept entrepreneurial acumen, the way how micro capital are manage and distributed to its countries, the management of big monies as poor countries are tend to be more corrupt that the developed countries as they steal &millions while big or large economies corruptions and redtapes are in $billions. Now a days, loobyidts, and big corporations or the global industries increases their spending in influencing govt. in the likes of China; buying US corrupt officials to influence good policies towards China. And vice-versa US big corporations influence ASIAN countries to favor companies towards ease of environmental, and capital transfers and etc. There is always a saying “we violate yours and we let you violate our laws too! Lots of fake news out there and who else to believe now a-days. Even in UK the home of the “Economist,” lots of UK govt. officials are doing🐒🙈🙊s

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics