The New Yorker’s Post

👤 In this edition of The POV, Konrad S. examines the professional history and presidential candidacy of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. His politics has continually sparked debate in a deeply polarised American election. Szumiński argues that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. emerges as a significant independent candidate due to his illustrious family background and contentious stance on vaccines. Despite his controversial views, Szumiński contends that Kennedy Jr.'s environmental activism and legal work demonstrate a commitment to change despite his polarising opinions, especially on vaccines, have alienated some voters. Yet, Szumiński believes Kennedy Jr. could attract disillusioned voters seeking an alternative to the current political dichotomy, positioning him as a potentially serious contender in the 2024 US election. #robertfkennedy #RFKjr #USA #2024election #uspolitics https://lnkd.in/e9UJMCj9

The content of our weekly ViewsLetter "Making Sense of this World" is available on Rosa Roubini Associates' website. In his column, titled “US Presidential Rate at a Crossroads”, Prof. Brunello Rosa reviews and discusses:   1. The nomination of Donald #Trump as the official candidate of the Republican Party for the US Presidential election in 2024; 2. Trump’s decision to appoint JD #Vance as is running mate, and potential VP in case of victory; 3. The radical views by JD Vance, which represent an attack to the Declaration of Independence of 1766; 4. Joe #Biden’s decision to drop out of the November race and his legacy; 5. Biden’s endorsement to #Harris as his successor in the race; 6. The further endorsements that Harris has received, from the party’s governors and grandees, including the #Clintons and the #Obamas; and 7. Why the US #presidential race is now re-opened. Read it here: https://lnkd.in/dHv6f6Z

Did you know? When it comes to the story of the U.S. presidency, we're not just readers; we're the authors! 📖✏️ Each president adds their own chapter, from Washington's graceful exit to JFK's big dreams and Obama's groundbreaking path. But here's the twist: the pen is in our hands now. We're the creators, the ones who decide what the next chapter looks like. Will it be a tale of unity, innovation, or something entirely new? The beauty of this story is that it's ongoing, and every vote, every voice is like a word on this ever-growing epic. So, what do you say? Ready to brainstorm the next big plot twist in the tale of the presidency with me? Let's chat about the legacy we want to write together. #OurPresidentialStory #NextChapterAwaits"

Some interesting info concerning some of our lesser known Presidents.

Has the political landscape evolved over the past 30 years to a point where U.S. Vice Presidents can successfully run for and assume the presidency? Here are several historical instances to consider: 1. John Adams (1797–1801) - The first Vice President under George Washington, Adams ascended to the presidency following Washington's tenure. 2. Thomas Jefferson (1801–1809) - Serving as Vice President under John Adams, Jefferson subsequently was elected President. 3. Martin Van Buren (1837–1841) - He held the Vice Presidency under Andrew Jackson before securing the presidency himself. 4. Richard Nixon (1969–1974) - After an unsuccessful presidential bid post his Vice Presidency under Dwight D. Eisenhower, Nixon was later elected in 1968. 5. George H.W. Bush (1989–1993) - Vice President under Ronald Reagan, Bush was elected President in 1988. These examples underscore the longstanding pathway from the Vice Presidency to the Presidency, often aided by the increased visibility and experience offered by the Vice Presidential role. Has Kamala Harris demonstrated, during her tenure as Vice President, the capabilities necessary to serve as Commander in Chief and President of the United States?

Prime example here of the Democrats’ strategy of “credentials create credibility”. They believe, by simply granting someone the title of “historian” (based on their own made up criteria and process), that makes what they have to say in the realm of history true or accurate, same with scientists, doctors, etc. The time has come to throw out bs credentials and judge information based on ITS MERIT and not ITS SOURCE. If your doctor tells you that poisonous mushrooms are good for you, will you eat them? Or will you question the merit of the information? Take this approach to everything you see and here on the internet. If it doesn’t make sense, there’s a reason.

I’m asking people for their thoughts on a specific and very targeted question. Regardless of your political affiliation, do you think this is true: In your honest assessment (using our head and not our heart), can Kamala Harris beat Donald Trump or not? I am a conservative Christian, and am not convinced on July 24th that Harris cannot defeat Trump. Presidential elections are where politics and business intersect like no other arena. The two (presumptive) candidates have very different paradigms, platforms, and agendas, all of which will have affects — either positive or negative — on virtually all of our industries and companies. I’m not asking people who they want to win. I am asking people who they think will win. The outcome will affect interest rates, energy costs, tax policies, green initiatives, infrastructure spending priorities, involvement in foreign wars, the Southern Border, immigration law enforcement, the judiciary, etc. If you comment, please be civil and polite. #2024Election #KamalaHarris #DonaldTrump #BarackObamaEndorsement