The VC Factory’s Post

Prosecutors working in the case against Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the embattled crypto magnate accused of siphoning billions of dollars from users of his crypto exchange FTX, are intent on demonstrating that SBF misled investors through false representations about his enterprise. Yet, one primary motivation behind Investors’ decision to bet on SBF may be their own doing. In an era where unicorns are not just mythical creatures but billion-dollar startups, Venture Capitalists find themselves grappling with not just economic realities but also psychological biases. One such bias that often masquerades as expert intuition is the “halo effect”—the tendency to make judgments about a person based on unrelated characteristics. In this post, I illustrate how the halo effect ruins VC decision-making through three case studies: SBF and the FTX/Alameda fiasco, Elizabeth Holmes with her ill-fated biotech company Theranos, and Bernie Madoff’s infamous Ponzi scheme. Each narrative offers a unique lens to understand how the halo effect can compromise due diligence, cloud judgment, and ultimately lead to poor investment decisions. https://lnkd.in/eZjxYJt2

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics