The Corydon Group, LLC’s Post

FOCUS Sessions Update: 25 states, Puerto Rico, D.C. and U.S. Congress are in session. The following states adjourned their 2024 legislative sessions on the dates provided: Ohio and Michigan (12/31), District of Columbia (1/2) and U.S. Congress (1/3). New Jersey is expected to adjourn its 2024 legislative session on 1/14. The following are expected to convene for the 2025 legislative session on the dates provided: Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas and Washington (1/13); Delaware, Minnesota, New Jersey, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming (1/14); Hawaii (1/15) and Alaska, New Mexico, Oregon and Utah (1/21).

8-13-24 Noon. Ronald Reagan luncheon sponsored by the #EBR Republican committee. Cafe Americain #batonrouge Questions for the metro council candidates endorsed by the East Baton Rouge Republican committee. Endorsed candidates are Brandon Noel District 1 and Laurie White Adams District 11. - If you could go back in time and vote 'no' on 3 programs/agenda items you previously voted 'yes' on, that have proven to be ineffective and a waste of taxpayer dollars, what would those 3 items be? - Y or N. If reelected, will you sponsor a resolution to have comments that are submitted electronically by citizens, READ during meetings when the related agenda item is presented? Y or N? - Y or N. If reelected, will you sponsor a resolution to eliminate the per page charges for electronically provided documents for public records requests? Y or N? - Y or N. Are you aware that BREC has not filed financials with the state since 2021? Y or N? Internal BREC documents show an 18 million $ deficit. If you are re-elected, what 2 specific things will you do for your constituents to demand transparency and accountability from BREC? What questions do you have?

Per Joe Lange’s X post: Announcement: Just in case you don’t see what’s going on here. Trump is the greatest “civics teacher” in our country’s history. This is all about “Senate Confirmation” and whether or not it is “constitutional.” Trump is literally nominating every single person that the enemy hates and almost all of them are being accused of “not qualified.” This is purposeful. Trump wants this fight!! He wants it to be very public. Why? The power belongs to the people and he just won a massive mandate. All of these candidates, now get to be contrasted with the “preferred” candidates of the establishment. But it’s way more than that. This fight is over whether or not a president gets to choose his own cabinet to run the “Executive Branch.” SEPARATION OF POWERS Congress will no longer be able to prevent a president elected by the people from fulfilling his promises by appointing the people he needs in place. Go back in history my friends. The Senate has encroached on the Executive Branch powers in regards to appointments. “The framers of the Constitution granted the Senate and the president shared power to appoint judges and civil officers. That shared power remains in place, but the way in which the Senate has exercised that power has changed over the course of its history. In its first decade, the Senate established the practice of senatorial courtesy, in which senators expected to be consulted on all nominees to federal posts within their states. This influence over filling federal jobs empowered senators, and many became leaders of the political parties that emerged in the early 19th century. By the late 19th century, however, presidents and senators began to clash over control of these lower level positions, prompting some to call for reform of the nomination process. Reformers who distrusted the power of political parties sought to reduce the number of positions subject to political patronage and the advice and consent of the Senate, pushing instead for legislation expanding the professional civil service. Despite these efforts, as the federal government grew in size in the 20th century, the number of appointments subject to Senate confirmation continued to grow until the 1980s, when Congress passed legislation that has gradually reduced the number of positions requiring confirmation.” senate.gov/about/powers-p… It started out as Senatorial “courtesy.” Not Senate “APPROVAL.” Trump is taking us back to the original constitution my friends. This is the opening salvo of reining in Congressional encroachment on the Executive Branch.

The President regained control of the clock. This battle over time itself presents its own dilemma to other political groups not eager, because fundamentally incompatible, to be identified with these two larger sides. The President’s signaling a “time out,” one argument goes, reveals the Marcos-Romualdez coalition’s caught on the horns of this dilemma: whether impeachment is even necessary to fatally weaken the chances of the Veep by 2028; or, if impeachment is necessary, when can it be successfully accomplished—before or after the midterms? The Duterte coalition’s own dilemma is whether it should now engage in performative martyrdom to gain public sympathy or continue to take the fight to its foes on the principle that the best defense is a good offense. https://lnkd.in/geFg6fUs

In the bustling political landscape of North Carolina, the race for lieutenant governor is heating up. With an array of candidates from diverse backgrounds throwing their hats into the ring, it's shaping up to be a battle of ideologies, strategies, and visions for the future of the Tar Heel State. At the heart of this race is not just the pursuit of a title, but the quest to influence key policy areas from education to healthcare. The lieutenant governor holds significant sway in legislative matters, making this position crucial for shaping North Carolina's trajectory. What's particularly fascinating is the strategic play by candidates to leverage their unique backgrounds and narratives. From seasoned politicians to newcomers with fresh perspectives, each is vying to resonate with voters and stakeholders alike. This race is a reminder of the evolving dynamics in state politics and the importance of leadership that reflects and responds to the needs of its constituents. For professionals and observers alike, it's a compelling watch, offering insights into effective leadership and campaign strategies in todays political climate. As we edge closer to election day, let's keep a keen eye on how these narratives unfold and what they signal for the future of North Carolina and beyond. The outcome could very well serve as a bellwether for broader political trends and shifts in the US. Your thoughts? What do you think are the key factors that will decide this race? https://lnkd.in/eU47eW5m

https://lnkd.in/dx5cX9PQ Today, the hearings for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is vying for the position of U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, will begin. He will appear before two relevant committees: 1) the Finance Committee and 2) the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (also known as HELP). For several months, his chances of being confirmed by the Senate have been actively discussed in the media. There has been talk of Kennedy’s lack of qualifications and his adherence to conspiracy theories, among other things. To be objective, he is not an expert in the field of medicine. He seems like someone who read a scientific article once and now quotes it at every opportunity. But since we are talking about a federal agency, it is not about a profession or specific education, but about management skills. And here, Kennedy does have a track record. He had his own law firm and a relatively successful private legal practice. The leitmotif of the media and analysts regarding his confirmation has been this: if they didn’t confirm TV host Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense, then Kennedy has no chance. The logic behind this cause-and-effect relationship was clear, since Hegseth had only recently started facing active criticism from the media, and Kennedy has been a favorite “target” of both his party and Republicans for many years. In other words, voting against Kennedy would seem more obvious and understandable if Hegseth had been rejected first. However, Hegseth was confirmed. He would have been doomed had it not been for the decisive vote from Vice President James Vance. And so, it seems, Kennedy’s chances have slightly increased. Meanwhile, during the vote on Hegseth’s nomination, a possible “resistance” from Republicans in the Senate emerged: former Senate leader Mitch McConnell from Kentucky, Senator Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, and Senator Susan Collins from Maine. Their “no” votes will not be enough against Kennedy, as Vance might come to Kennedy’s aid once again in a 50/50 scenario. This is understood by Kennedy’s opponents. Therefore, the organization Protect Our Care has funded an ad campaign against him. The ads will not only be shown in Washington (D.C., not the state) but also in the states of several Republican senators: Alaska, Maine, Kentucky, South Dakota, Louisiana, North Carolina, Iowa, and Utah. In other words, Kennedy’s opponents are focusing on Republican senators from these states. Some are hopeful about Senator John Curtis from Utah, who replaced Trump opponent Mitt Romney in this post. Curtis has occasionally, like Romney, criticized the president and even did not support him in the last Republican primaries. However, while in the House of Representatives since 2017, Curtis’s position on bills and initiatives has aligned with Trump’s 94.4% of the time.

Creating a powerful working relationship between legislative and executive branches is a mutual effort. Executives who work well with legislative leaders and entire legislatures will more likely succeed than those who do not take the time or make the effort to develop relationships. Legislative leaders also need to develop good rapport with fellow legislative leaders, their membership, and the executive branch. Individual members are also important cogs of an effective government. It's not hard to throw a wrench into the works and halt government trappings. Electing many who will work for the good of all is something all voters must work for. #cooperation #rapport #government #legislativesessions #goodgovernance

Some answers to questions about what Harris would DO as President.

New Beginnings at the South Carolina State House: The 126th General Assembly Kicks Off! This week marked the start of a new two-year legislative session in South Carolina, with a number of key developments shaping the agenda. From fresh faces in the legislature to education reform, tax cuts, and a spotlight on the Treasurer’s office, there’s plenty to watch. Highlights: ▶️ A new wave of 13 senators, strengthening the Republican supermajority ▶️ A push for school vouchers and tax cuts from Governor McMaster ▶️ Tensions rising in the Treasurer’s office with calls for impeachment over a $1.8B accounting discrepancy ▶️ New internal GOP dynamics in the House as the Freedom Caucus challenges mainstream Republicans ▶️ South Carolina’s first-ever monument honoring an individual African American, Robert Smalls, a historic move to celebrate diversity and state history. For more on what’s happening at the South Carolina State House and how it could impact your priorities, check out our full blog post. 🔗https://lnkd.in/egShEMKa As the session gains momentum, Alpha Strategies is here to help you navigate the landscape and ensure your voice is heard. Let’s turn opportunities into action! #SouthCarolina #Legislation #PolicyUpdate #Lobbying #PublicAffairs #AlphaStrategies

With new members entering the senate, house, and White House, politics will have a huge impact on upcoming #HigherEd policy decisions. The key takeaway for boards is to be prepared. Learn more about how to best steer your board through these upcoming changes: https://lnkd.in/eqt_cpgP