Tom Walski’s Post

View profile for Tom Walski, graphic

Industry Analyst at Bentley Systems

It was great to see all of the responses to this blog. It’s a topic that people never seem to get bored with. The bottom line for me is that as long as you are working with typical water and sewer piping, it doesn’t matter much if you use the Darcy-Weisbach or Hazen-William equation. Ther important thing is that you use the correct value for the pipes. This model user should understand the extent of the uncertainty brought about by using the nominal rather than internal diameter and ignoring minor losses from fittings like open valves and pipe branches. Over the past few years, our team at Bentley has put out about 140 blogs like this one on a wide range of water topics. You might find some you like. https://lnkd.in/eSY3TipJ We’ve added some features to that web site where now you can search by keyword or filter by topic. Tom

In his latest blog - "Exactly How Bad Is the Hazen-Williams Head Loss Equation for Water and Wastewater?" - Bentley expert Tom Walski explains the potential limitations of the equation and why there is no theoretically perfect equation for head loss when dealing with turbulent flow in #water and #wastewater systems. 💧 Read on for details. #engineering #headloss #hydraulicmodeling

Exactly How Bad Is the Hazen-Williams Head Loss Equation for Water and Wastewater? | Bentley Blog | Infrastructure Engineering Software & Solutions

Exactly How Bad Is the Hazen-Williams Head Loss Equation for Water and Wastewater? | Bentley Blog | Infrastructure Engineering Software & Solutions

blog.bentley.com

Julian T.

Owner and Senior Consultant at Thornton International - Reducing water losses - Increasing Efficiency

6mo

Hi Tom I’d like to add the importance of good field calibration with flow and pressure measurement and not just a few fire flow tests. In my humble opinion if you intend to really use the model then it’s worth spending the money to properly field calibrate it.

Clayton Bubeck, P.E.

President and CEO at RETTEW

6mo

I’ve been learning from Tom Walski for nearly 30 years and he’s still making me a better engineer everyday. Thank you Dr. Walski. I truly appreciate you.

Great summary Tom. A few years ago I was also digging into this and found an article in a old AWWA journal where it highlighted that one of the reasons for Hazen-Williams becoming more popular was that Hazen and Williams handed out slide rules at conferences. I always thought it was interesting how something that was a physical approach to make the calculations simpler carried over into the software I now look at all standards from a history perspective thinking about how it may have evolved over time

Dennis McClain

Retired Professional Engineer

6mo

Hazen Williams slide rule

  • No alternative text description for this image
David T. Williams, PhD, PE, CFM, PH, CPESC, BC.WRE, F.ASCE

SDVOSB I Former Airborne Combat Engineer I Board Certified Water Resources Engineer

6mo

Ahhh, I remember using the Moody Diagram/ chart to do this and my accuracy in reading it was in the same order of magnitude of error as the miscellaneous losses that I missed! I hope you are doing well!

Fred L. Ogden

Chief Scientist for Water Prediction at NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration

6mo

Just curious. Why show the Darcy-Weisbach equation when asking a question about Hazen-Williams formula?

Great post, Tom. I enjoyed this one.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics