Tyler Walsh’s Post

Things are getting interesting... As the music lawsuits heat up, AI Music platforms Suno and Udio are finally admitting to using copyrighted music for training their AI models. Their argument is "Learning is not infringing. It never has been, and it is not now." and that their training methods fall under fair use and accuse major record labels of stifling industry competition. I think the music industry is in the midst of another Napster level event with the movie industry following up. I also think there is a lot of potential for some unknown startup platforms who will monopolize on the outcome of this. What are your thoughts? https://lnkd.in/eQpQx4D9 #ai #aimusic #artificialintelligence

(Forbes) In order for generative AI systems to work, they need training data. And in the last week, more companies have taken a stand against AI companies using theirs without permission. ▪️ One of these fights will take place in the traditional place for copyright disputes: The court system. Three heavy-hitters in the music industry—UMG, Warner and Sony—sued AI music generating platforms Suno and Udio AI, accusing them of stealing their music. ▪️ The lawsuit says the AI music platforms use “massive and ongoing infringement” as they take copyrighted songs to train their LLMs. ▪️ In a statement shared with Forbes, Suno CEO Mikey Shulman said Suno “prize(s) originality” and tried to explain to the record labels that its technology is “designed to generate completely new outputs, not to memorize and regurgitate pre-existing content,” but Shulman said the labels “reverted to their old lawyer-led playbook.” #music #ai #aimodels #aimodeltraining #copyright #songs #llm #llmtraining #trainingdata #infringement #musicindustry https://lnkd.in/g53KexD6

Pioneering Legal Challenge: AI in the Music Industry Universal Music Group, Sony Music, and Warner Records have initiated copyright lawsuits against AI companies Udio and Suno for using copyrighted music to train their AI models. Highlighted by Reuters as the first of its kind, these lawsuits signal the music industry's proactive stance against the challenges posed by music-generating AI, potentially reshaping the future development of generative AI in creative fields. As the industry navigates these technological advancements, it's crucial to consider the implications for both creators' rights and ethical AI use, ensuring a balanced approach for all involved. Ars Technica Benj Edwards Danny Goh Mark Esposito, PhD Terence Tse, PhD #MusicIndustry #CopyrightLaw #ArtificialIntelligence #TechNews #Transparency #EthicalAI https://lnkd.in/gF8G9f_A For more discussion, please visit https://lnkd.in/gqDPtry3.

You might recall a post I shared about Suno, an AI app designed to simplify music creation. It seems that they may have forgotten to pay the artists whose material they use to generate AI music. Who could have seen this coming? 😉 Major music labels like Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Records, and Capitol Records are suing Suno and Udio. They accuse these startups of using copyrighted works from top artists to train their AI without permission. This lawsuit, and potentially others to follow, could establish important legal precedents regarding the use of training data for AI models and the compensation of artists and content creators. https://lnkd.in/gqKkZHEG

📢 Major Lawsuit Alert: Record Industry vs AI Music Generators SUNO and Udio! The recording industry has taken a bold step, suing AI music generators SUNO and Udio for copyright infringement. The legal stakes are immense, with potential to reshape how AI and the music industry coexist. What does this mean for the future of music creation? 🎶 📌 Key Arguments: - Can AI-generated music be considered original, or does it inherently breach copyright laws? - What constitutes fair use in the context of AI's role in creative arts? 👥 Reactions: - Artists and producers are divided, with some seeing AI as a tool for innovation while others view it as a threat to their livelihoods. - Legal experts are closely analyzing this case, predicting it could set a groundbreaking precedent. 🔮 Potential Outcomes: - A ruling against AI companies could impose strict limitations on how AI tools can be used in the music industry. - A decision favoring AI could open the floodgates for more AI-driven creative content. 🤔 Your Thoughts? - Do you believe AI should have the right to create music? - How should copyright laws adapt to rapidly advancing AI technology? Join the discussion and stay informed on this pivotal moment for AI and music! 👇 Let's hear your take in the comments! #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #MusicIndustry #Copyright #Innovation #LegalBattle #MusicTechnology #ApexWebServices https://lnkd.in/dc4f3c8q

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in the music industry has brought about a complex and contentious landscape where innovation intersects with intellectual property rights. Recently, two leading text-to-music AI tools, Suno and Udio, have found themselves at the center of this debate, facing lawsuits for copyright infringement filed by the three major record labels, and led by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). The record labels allege that Suno and Udio used their recordings without a license to train Suno’s and Udio’s respective AI models. These claims bring to light broader issues regarding the ethical and legal implications of AI-generated content, the need for regulatory clarity, and the evolving relationship between technology and creativity.

The AI Transparency Act: Who’s Training Who? Should AI developers be required to disclose the materials used to train their models? The music industry thinks so. Backing the proposed TRAIN Act, they’re pushing for transparency to protect creators’ rights and ensure fair use of their work. #AI #Copyright #Transparency #Legaltech

AI AND THE LAW 🤖 ... Training AI is the new frontier for legal scholars to chime in. Whether it is training with personal data or copyrighted works, the big question remains -- IS IT LEGAL TO TRAIN MY AI WITH THIS DATA? This question is the main focus of discussion between many legal scholars, lawyers and compliance experts around the world and a good forum to put those arguments to the test is the music industry (litigious by record). In the copyright world -- On one side, the music industry will argue that training with copyrighted works without the owner's permission is copyright infringement. On the other side, technology companies may very well argue that such activities fall under the fair use doctrine. The answer is not an easy one. Specially because we need to rely on fact-heavy scenarios to reach a sound conclusion. Here is a great example of one of the many actual and potential litigation that will shape the legal and regulatory landscape in the next months.

The emergence of AI systems capable of creating music has ignited a fierce debate in the music industry. The situation is exemplified by Tift Merritt, a Grammy-nominated artist, who has criticized AI-generated music from platforms like Udio. Merritt views these AI attempts as "stealing" rather than true creativity, raising concerns about the implications for artistic integrity. This issue has escalated to legal battles, with major record labels—Sony Music, Universal Music Group, and Warner Music—suing AI companies like Udio and Suno. They argue that AI is flooding the market with "cheap imitations" and potentially undermining human artists’ revenue and recognition. AI companies defend their technologies, drawing parallels to past technological advancements like synthesizers. They claim their tools create original works and frame the lawsuits as attacks on smaller innovators in the market. The legal complexities are profound, with questions about "fair use" and the nature of originality in AI-generated content coming to the forefront. As the courts deliberate, the outcomes will likely set significant precedents for how AI interacts with copyright law and the creative industry. The debate continues: Can AI truly innovate in music, or is it simply replicating human creativity? What are the implications for artists and the future of music technology? #AIMusic #CopyrightDebate #MusicIndustry #ArtificialIntelligence #LegalTech #FairUse #Innovation #CreativeRights #MusicTech https://lnkd.in/exsPjfhT

Another important draft law in America to tackle copyright infringement by AI companies. https://lnkd.in/eh-WvW3S "We strongly support the bill which prioritizes creators who continue to be exploited by unjust AI practices.” David Israelite President & CEO of 🇺🇸 group National Music Publishers' Association. There's no legal or moral excuse for AI or Big Tech companies accessing, training or generating #AI using digital music without permission. Doing so is simply ripping off artists & creators. Between the TRAIN Act & the COPIED Act, there is alignment with the infringement prevention & training transparency measures agreed in the EU AI Act - which gives clarity internationally. And as the many recent music industry deals by our member companies have demonstrated, legal #GenAI & #AI training is perfectly possible & there to be done. #ArtificialIntelligence #RealRights 🌎🎶