TÜV Rheinland Middle East’s Post

Crucial information regarding CE Marking for Machines

🔧 As per the Machinery Regulation (EU) 2013/1230, CE marking for machines according to (EU) 2013/1230 is only possible from January 14, 2027. Until this date, machines will still be CE marked according to the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. Take advantage of the transition period until January 20, 2027, to adapt your machines to the new legislation in Europe. Contact our experts now for more information 🖱️: https://lnkd.in/d38DKzs 📝 What's new? The Machinery Regulation contains more detailed and clearer requirements, extended requirements for functional safety (e.g., software), and aspects of cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. In addition, safety requirements for autonomous (mobile) machines have been added. 💼 Important for companies: The obligations of the individual economic operators (manufacturer, authorized representative, importer, and distributor) are described and presented in Chapter II of the regulation. 👉 Take advantage of TÜV Rheinland's expertise: We will be happy to carry out the inspection of your current machinery in accordance with the essential health and safety requirements of Annex III. In addition, we offer you the option of having Annex III of the Machinery Ordinance already tested for new machine developments. Contact us today.

🔧 As per the Machinery Regulation (EU) 2013/1230, CE marking for machines according to (EU) 2013/1230 is only possible from January 14, 2027. Until this date, machines will still be CE marked according to the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. Take advantage of the transition period until January 20, 2027, to adapt your machines to the new legislation in Europe. Contact our experts now for more information 🖱️: https://lnkd.in/d38DKzs 📝 What's new? The Machinery Regulation contains more detailed and clearer requirements, extended requirements for functional safety (e.g., software), and aspects of cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. In addition, safety requirements for autonomous (mobile) machines have been added. 💼 Important for companies: The obligations of the individual economic operators (manufacturer, authorized representative, importer, and distributor) are described and presented in Chapter II of the regulation. 👉 Take advantage of TÜV Rheinland's expertise: We will be happy to carry out the inspection of your current machinery in accordance with the essential health and safety requirements of Annex III. In addition, we offer you the option of having Annex III of the Machinery Ordinance already tested for new machine developments. Contact us today. #MachineSafety #CEMarking

📅🏭 As of January 20th, 2027, the CE marking of machines or the assessment of partly completed machines will be mandatory in Europe according to the Machinery Regulation EU 2023/1230. Use the transition period to adapt your machines and processes according to the regulation. Our flyer informs you about the most important changes. Download now [Flyer] 🔄 Transition period: Machines placed on the market or put into operation before January 20, 2027, must still be CE marked according to the old Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. 📝 Changes in content: The new Machinery Directive brings with it a number of innovations, including expanded requirements for functional safety (e.g., software), aspects of cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence. In addition, safety requirements for autonomous (mobile) machines have been added. 🛠️ Take advantage of TÜV Rheinland's expertise: We will be happy to carry out the testing of your current machinery in accordance with the essential health and safety requirements of Annex III. In addition, we offer you the option of having Annex III of the Machinery Ordinance already tested for new machine developments. Download flyer now: https://lnkd.in/gitqqMdk #MachineSafety #CEMarking

📅🏭 As of January 20th, 2027, the CE marking of machines or the assessment of partly completed machines will be mandatory in Europe according to the Machinery Regulation EU 2023/1230. Use the transition period to adapt your machines and processes according to the regulation. Our flyer informs you about the most important changes. Download now [Flyer] 🔄 Transition period: Machines placed on the market or put into operation before January 20, 2027, must still be CE marked according to the old Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. 📝 Changes in content: The new Machinery Directive brings with it a number of innovations, including expanded requirements for functional safety (e.g., software), aspects of cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence. In addition, safety requirements for autonomous (mobile) machines have been added. 🛠️ Take advantage of TÜV Rheinland's expertise: We will be happy to carry out the testing of your current machinery in accordance with the essential health and safety requirements of Annex III. In addition, we offer you the option of having Annex III of the Machinery Ordinance already tested for new machine developments. Download flyer now: https://lnkd.in/gitqqMdk

There are a number of ways you can invite risk into your hardware, as we’re seeing here with the latest developments on Boeing’s quality control failures. Relying on just a few employees to retain crucial knowledge creates unnecessary bottlenecks in your system, and burning them out with labor-intensive, manual processes exposes your vehicle to potential disaster. Sift mitigates risk and prevents burn out by capturing your institutional knowledge so it’s easy to access, share, and retain. With automated data review and standardized reporting, your engineers can focus on what they’re good at – building (and safeguarding) your machines.

Protect YOUR COMPANY AND TEAM - are you an early adopter to AI Safety Systems that will save lives or does your company lag behind others? If you are an early adopter you will call Earthmoving Technology Solutions to make your machinery Safety Shield Certified - if your a company that lags behind than we will see you down the road when it’s mandatory

Types of Failures: * Safe failure: is the failure of an element, inside a component that plays a part in implementing a safety function, that results in a spurious operation of the safety function. It places the machine into a safe state. An example of a safe failure for a power contactor is when, despite the contactor coil is energised, the coil itself has a failure and the power contacts open. * Dangerous failure: is the failure of an element, inside a component that plays a part in implementing a safety function, that prevents the safety function from operating when required such that the machine is put into a hazardous or potentially hazardous state. An example of a dangerous failure for a power contactor is when, despite the contactor coil was de-energised, the power contacts do not open and therefore the dangerous movement continues. * No Effect Failure: the failure of an element, inside a component that plays a part in implementing a safety function, but that has no direct effect on the safety function itself. An example of a No effect failure for a power contactor is when it will not close once the safety function is reset. For example the door gate in a robot cell is closed, the safety system is reset but the robot does not start. This failure is of no relevance for the safety function and it has an influence only on the robot availability, but not on its safety. The Safe Failure Fraction (SFF): SFF was introduced in the first edition of IEC 61508 as a measure used to determine the minimum level of redundancy, or better, of Hardware Fault Tolerance (HFT), of a safety subsystem. The SFF can be defined as a property of a safety component, like a pressure transmitter, that is defined by the ratio of the average failure rates of safe plus dangerous detected failures and safe plus dangerous failures. SFF= (λs+λdd) / (λs+λd) The SFF is the proportion of “safe” failures among all failures: please notice that neither the No Effect nor the No Part failures are considered. A “safe” failure is either a failure that is safe by design, or a dangerous failure that is immediately detected and corrected. IEC standards define a safe failure as a failure that does not have the potential to put the SIS in a hazardous or fail-to-function state. A dangerous detected failure is a failure that can prevent the SIS from performing a specific SIF, but when detected soon after its occurrence, for example by online diagnostics, the failure is considered to be “safe” since the Diagnostics can bring the system to a safe state. In some cases, the SIS can automatically respond to a dangerous detected failure as if it were a true demand, for example, causing the shutdown of the process. Many electronic safety devices have built-in diagnostics such that most dangerous failures become Dangerous Detected failures and they will therefore have a high SFF. Mechanical safety devices, for which internal diagnostics is not feasible, will have, in general, a low SFF.

The most effective and precise battery inspection technology

📢 Hey LinkedIn fam, let's talk about the difference between static and dynamic calibrations! 🚗💨 So, here's the deal: a static calibration is typically done in a service bay with the help of a target system and a scan tool. On the other hand, a dynamic calibration is performed during a test drive and usually requires a scan tool as well. The cool thing about dynamic calibrations is that they are generally easier to do and require less equipment. 🛠️ Now, when it comes to meeting specific criteria, technicians need to keep in mind the traffic conditions and lane markings on the roads near their shop, as well as the distance required for a proper dynamic calibration. It's all about creating the right conditions for a successful calibration. 🚦 But not every vehicle needs both types of calibrations. If your shop is working on more domestic vehicles, dynamic calibrations will be your focus. On the other hand, Asian vehicles usually require more static calibrations. And sometimes, you might even need to do both! It all depends on your shop's car parc. 🚘 Now, bringing calibrations in-house is just the first step. The next challenge is finding the right people. As calibrations continue to evolve, technicians need to be trained on the latest equipment and technology to ensure safe and efficient repairs. That's why shops are on the lookout for technicians who think outside the box and have a hunger for continuous growth and learning. 📚 Here's where a partnership with asTech - Driven by Repairify comes into play. When you team up with us, we provide extensive training and the proper equipment to guide technicians along the repair plan. In the midst of the current labor shortage, this partnership offers your shop the tools, equipment, and support needed to make bringing calibrations in-house a less daunting task. Together, we can tackle any calibration challenge! 💪 Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or if you're interested in exploring a partnership with asTech. Let's keep the conversation going! 🚀 #calibration #automotiverepair #partnership #collisionrepair