UCSF Benioff Homelessness & Housing Initiative’s Post

Today, the Supreme Court ruled that cities may arrest and fine people for resting outside, even when they have nowhere else to go. This devastating decision goes against the data on how best to end homelessness. Housing solves homelessness – fines and jails do not. These punitive measures make a bad situation worse, by harming people and making it even more difficult for them to access housing in the future.   "America is experiencing the most profound housing crisis it has had in decades, which has left too many people without the safety and security of home," says Dr. Margot Kushel MD. "Federal and state policymakers must make the difficult choices necessary to solve our housing crisis." State and local governments can lead the way in solving the homelessness crisis by investing in proven solutions. Here's how: ➡ increase access to affordable housing for extremely low-income households ➡ expand targeted homelessness prevention ➡ provide support to match the behavioral health needs of the population ➡ increase household incomes "We know that the American people want the homelessness crisis solved and we know that only access to affordable housing for everyone will do that. Today, the Supreme Court has moved us toward a future where people can be arrested for sleeping." Read Dr. Kushel's full statement: https://lnkd.in/g6gzZJja

Statement by UCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative Director Dr. Margot Kushel on the Supreme Court’s Decision in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson | Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative

Statement by UCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative Director Dr. Margot Kushel on the Supreme Court’s Decision in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson | Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative

homelessness.ucsf.edu

Dr. Katie Spencer White, Msc, PGDL

President/CEO at Mid Maine Homeless Shelter & Services | Lecturer at The Roux Institute @ Northeastern University

3mo

It's a nuanced point, but one that bears sharing. SCOTUS affirmed the traditional interpretation of the 8th Amendment in that it applies to the nature of punishments as cruel and unusual, not the statutes that define the crime. Citing people for sleeping in public does is not cruel and unusual and it applies to all people. They did not extend the Robinson's prohibition on criminalizing status to the status of being homeless. It wasn't a policy decision. It was, in essence, a legal decision with significant policy implications. Policy makers must now go and make policy. Voters must elect policy makers who will get this right. The law won't save us. We have to save ourselves at the ballot box.

Matthew Haas

Senior Vice President & Senior Banker, Community Development Lending & Investing at KeyBank

3mo

Criminalization just reinforces downward cycle of poverty and the trauma

O'Toole Thomas

Deputy Assistant Undersecretary for Health - Clinical Services Veterans Health Administration

3mo

Well said - thank you for your leadership and advocacy…giving voice to those not heard

Like
Reply
Heidi Schmitz LMSW-Clinical, MSW, BA, RMT

Mental Health Therapist at Lotus Consulting, PLLC

3mo

Fining and jailing homeless folks is not the answer! Just terrible! Homelessness is not a crime.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics