U.S. Withdrawal from the World Health Organization and its broader implications Our President's article in Kathimerini highlights the profound implications of the U.S. decision on global health equity and ethical responsibility. As Julia Tseti states in her article: One of the largest and most powerful countries in the world is withdrawing from an organization it once spearheaded—one whose very foundation bears its imprint. Global superpowers pave the way, while smaller, less influential countries follow suit. But in this case, how can we meaningfully discuss reducing inequalities and fostering inclusion while still addressing matters of global public health? If the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored anything with unmistakable clarity, it is that health crises will persist—indeed, they are only just beginning. The climate crisis, looming large on the horizon, is merely the tip of the iceberg for what is yet to come… Beyond public health emergencies, the global health landscape faces pressing concerns: non-communicable diseases (NCDs), rare disorders, relentless scientific research for groundbreaking therapies, and the continuous development of vaccines—efforts spearheaded by the scientific community and leading research institutions worldwide. Therefore, the U.S. decision to withdraw from the World Health Organization boycotts and hinders precisely these critical efforts, leading not only patients and vulnerable communities but, above all, science itself down dangerous paths. *The article was published in Kathimerini on Saturday February 22, 2025 https://lnkd.in/d6JCbM4c #USA #WHO #Kathimerini
