U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Oklahoma’s Post

Money isn't everything, especially in the eyes of the court! In a recent case involving a staggering $1 billion, US District Court reiterated the need for demonstrable, imminent harm to grant any preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order. When advising clients on factors courts favor for granting provisional relief, a responsible practitioner must focus on actual events rather than potential future occurrences. Check our recent blog for a detailed rundown of this fascinating case: https://lnkd.in/gDicmcmv #businesslitigation #commerciallaw #longislandlawfirm

Court of Protection Matters Dealing with #courtofprotection issues can be stressful, especially when it’s unfamiliar territory. Not sure where to start? Hopefully, our FAQs will help >> https://lnkd.in/eZSy-NNq

Unravel the complexities of solicitor-client privilege in estate administration! Discover key takeaways from a recent BC Supreme Court ruling and gain valuable insights into protecting beneficiary interests. #EstatePlanning #LegalNews https://bit.ly/4aWELHm

While losing possession on the court is part of the game, property penalties are not. Thanks to Jack Jaffa & Associates, all violations are cleared, keeping the Garden compliant and thriving. Trust us to handle your compliance needs with expertise and precision. #NYCPropertyManagement #PropertyCompliance #NYCBuildings #PropertyManagement

Just to be really clear on the prohibition of cross examination of DA victims in County Courts, and, particularly, if a Restraining Order is in place. If these can't be followed, how on earth will we protect survivors of DA. They have been implemented in the DA Bill for a reason: Section 66 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 that reads: “Prohibition of cross examination in civil matters in County Courts and Section 85G which reads: “Prohibition of cross-examination in persons: persons protected by injunctions” and sub-section 1: “In civil proceedings, no party to the proceedings against whom an on-notice protective injunction is in force may cross-examine in person a witness who is protected by the injunction

Attention California Employers! Cal/OSHA has announced civil penalty increases for 2024, affecting a range of violations. Ensure your compliance to avoid costly penalties. Read our update at the link below for a quick breakdown of how this may impact your business. Read More: https://bit.ly/4a8oa37 Stay informed, stay safe. #WorkplaceSafety #CalOSHA #ComplianceUpdate

Learn about the Court of Protection, which supports individuals who can't make decisions for themselves. If you need ongoing decision-making powers, the Court can appoint a Deputy. Discover more: https://bit.ly/3Q0OWCO or call us at 01792 420844. #CourtOfProtection #LegalAdvice

🚨 ICYMI: Maximum #OSHA civil penalties have been raised for 2024! The new fines are $16,131 per serious violation, $161,323 for repeat and willful violations and $16,131 (per day) for failure to abate. For more insight on how to stay in compliance with OSHA regulations, as well as other #riskmanagement strategies, check out our website. https://hubs.la/Q02m6bP80

QUESTION OF THE WEEK Today, Christine Marsh answers the question, how are Court of Protection costs dealt with? #COP #PrivateClient #QuestionOfTheWeek