Indian Performance at the Olympics
The performance in the summer Olympics is a classic case of inflated expectations fueled by misplaced optimism about India's economic rise. This so-called optimism is built on a shaky foundation of inadequate technique, outdated technology and inapt processes.
The current results displayed in the summer Olympics reek of too much self-promotion and self-aggrandizement based on small victories won by athletes without realistically benchmarking them against High Performance statistics on the world stage. Bravado neither wins in the battle field nor does it win gold medals in the fields of play, this requires synchronisation of strategy, operational art with ground level tactics.
While the data is available in open sources, realistic assessments of current performance standards and performance gaps are lacking. Moreover, since the Olympic Games occur only once every four years, we often witness a short sighted approach to crisis management, where long term planning is forsaken for immediate gains. A case in point is Indian archery, which is currently under the spotlight of criticism. The real question is, why wasn’t bench strength prepared to ensure that India produced more athletes who could perform consistently and under pressure?
If anyone has witnessed the training of elite special forces, they would understand the need to select individuals who can sustain the highest amount of pressure through a ruthless process of weeding out, as the stakes are of life and death. We need to approach High Performance sports with the same spirit as the special forces does, where coming second or being a runners up is not an option, as it could mean losing life or limb, moreover national prestige is at stake in both the cases.
I am also aghast at the casualness displayed by some federations in their preparations and post match analysis. Blaming weather and other factors while brushing off results is unacceptable, especially when the same conditions affected the winners, who triumphed despite adverse conditions.
In addition being in a celebratory mode with three bronze medals is also not enough, despite their best efforts the bitter pill is that a bronze medallist is not a winner, he/she is the third best. The question that needs to be asked is why, despite fielding our best and highest number of athletes in shooting, we could only manage bronze medals. Are lessons being learned? Is someone recording these insights in a repository for posterity? Are we achieving self reliance in coaching? Have our federations become free of political machinations and are they completely merit based? These pressing questions must be answered if we ever hope to rise above mediocrity.
My two Bit
Second Year Student PGE at l'EM Strasbourg, Alsace, France.
3moLe même effort, la même finalité = la même récompense. 👏⚧️