Veracode’s Post

In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity, relying solely on SAST (Static Application Security Testing) and DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing) is no longer sufficient. A recent GitGuardian blog post delves into the limitations of these traditional approaches and highlights the necessity for a more comprehensive security strategy. Key takeaways: - Blind Spots in SAST and DAST: While SAST analyzes source code and DAST tests running applications, they both miss critical vulnerabilities related to secrets management, supply chain risks, and infrastructure as code. - The Need for Holistic Security: Incorporating additional layers such as secret detection, dependency scanning, and IaC security is essential to cover the gaps left by SAST and DAST. - Proactive Measures: Shift-left security practices and continuous monitoring can help detect and mitigate issues earlier in the development lifecycle, ensuring a more robust security posture. #CyberSecurity #AppSec #SAST #DAST #DevSecOps #SecurityStrategy #GitGuardian Read the full article to understand more: https://lnkd.in/ejZknC2Q

Boost developer productivity and enablement . Fortify Aviator is more than just a tool—it’s a developer’s personal security champion. Understanding that security can often be seen as a complex and daunting task, Fortify Aviator audits and explains security issues in the context of your code. It translates security jargon into terms that developers understand, making it easier for them to grasp the nature of the vulnerabilities and the necessary fixes.

We created this complete guide to Static Application Security Testing (SAST) to help your development team understand where this technique fits in your security deployment. https://lnkd.in/dmhgNHHq #codesecurity #appsecurity #appsec #sast #codequality #staticcodeanalysis 

Overlapping security controls and layered security with proper segmentation are the way to go. "Why SAST + DAST can't be enough" Static and dynamic app testing are cornerstones for any comprehensive AppSec program, yet they rarely rise up to the challenges of fully securing modern software. Discover why secrets are one of their critical blind spots. #cybersecurity #softwaredevelopment #softwaresecurity #sast #dast #sbom

🚀 Unlock the Secrets of API Testing and Safeguard Your Applications! 🔒 In our latest blog post, we dive deep into the world of API testing and why it’s crucial for securing your web and mobile applications. 🌐📱 With the rise in sophisticated attacks, it’s more important than ever to ensure your APIs are secure. Don’t let vulnerabilities compromise your applications or data! 🔗 Read the full article here: https://lnkd.in/eQ9AZdcv 👉 Join the conversation: Share your thoughts on API security and let us know how your organization approaches API testing! #API #APItesting #CyberSecurity #SoftwareDevelopment #Tech #Security #APIFirst #DataProtection #BusinessSecurity

OWASP Top 10: Essential Guide for Securing Your Applications 🔐 The OWASP Top 10 is a standard awareness document for developers and web application security professionals. It represents a broad consensus about the most critical security risks to web applications. Here’s a quick overview of the OWASP Top 10: Broken Access Control: Ensure that users can only access the data and resources they are authorized for. Cryptographic Failures: Properly protect sensitive data, especially during transmission and storage. Injection: Prevent attackers from sending malicious code through your application inputs. Insecure Design: Build security into your applications from the ground up. Security Misconfiguration: Regularly update and patch systems and use security best practices for configurations. Vulnerable and Outdated Components: Keep all components, including libraries and dependencies, up-to-date. Identification and Authentication Failures: Ensure that user identity and authentication are robust and secure. Software and Data Integrity Failures: Protect against unauthorized code changes and ensure data integrity. Security Logging and Monitoring Failures: Implement logging and monitoring to detect and respond to incidents promptly. Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Be cautious of SSRF vulnerabilities, which can allow attackers to make requests on behalf of the server.  Why it Matters: With these risks in mind, organizations can better prioritize their security efforts and safeguard their applications against the most common and impactful threats.  Action Steps: Review: Regularly review your applications against the OWASP Top 10. Train: Educate your team about these common risks. Secure: Implement security best practices throughout your development process. Check out the full OWASP Top 10 list here: https://lnkd.in/eBpHZkiH Let's make security a priority! 🚀 #CyberSecurity #OWASP #ApplicationSecurity #InfoSec #DevSecOps Michael Tchuindjang Lateral Connect

Start this week by catching up on one of our most-read blog posts from 2023, in which we help you prepare for an API penetration test and gain a deeper understanding of the process, the tools, and the most common API security risks. #penetrationtest #APIpenetrationtest #pentest

Exploring SAST vs DAST: Unraveling the Layers of Application Security Testing In the realm of application security, Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) are two pivotal methodologies, each offering a distinct perspective on fortifying software against vulnerabilities. Let's delve into the nuances of SAST and DAST to understand their strengths, limitations, and how they complement each other. Static Application Security Testing (SAST): SAST, often referred to as "white-box testing," is akin to scrutinizing the blueprint of a building before it's constructed. It analyzes the source code, byte code, or binary code of an application without executing it. Here's a snapshot of what SAST brings to the security table: Early Detection: SAST identifies vulnerabilities during the development phase by scanning the source code or compiled binaries. This facilitates early mitigation before the code reaches production. Code-centric Analysis: It examines the application's codebase, looking for weaknesses, security flaws, and coding errors. This approach provides a thorough understanding of the application's internal structure. Integration into CI/CD Pipelines: SAST seamlessly integrates with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, ensuring security is an integral part of the development lifecycle. Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST): DAST, often known as "black-box testing," takes a different route by evaluating a running application as an attacker would. It simulates real-world attacks to assess vulnerabilities from an external perspective. Let's highlight the key aspects of DAST: Runtime Analysis: DAST assesses an application during runtime, interacting with it just like an external user. This dynamic approach allows for the identification of security vulnerabilities that might only manifest in specific runtime conditions. Real-world Simulation: By emulating actual attack scenarios, DAST provides insights into how an application would fare against threats in a production environment. This includes potential vulnerabilities introduced by third-party components. Post-Deployment Testing: DAST is particularly beneficial for applications already deployed in a production environment, helping to identify vulnerabilities that might have been missed during the development phase. Balancing Act: SAST and DAST in Harmony: While both SAST and DAST bring unique perspectives to the table, they are most effective when used together. The strengths of one can compensate for the limitations of the other. Combining SAST and DAST creates a potent defense against application vulnerabilities. Each method brings unique strengths; SAST for early code analysis, and DAST for real-world simulation. Employing both ensures a comprehensive and resilient application security strategy. #AppSec #SASTvsDAST #SecurityTesting

🚀 New Blog Post: Mastering Burp Suite Bambdas for Web Security Testing In my latest article, I dive deep into Burp Suite Bambdas — an incredibly powerful tool for automating and customizing your web security testing workflow. Learn how to use Bambdas to automate common tasks, improve efficiency, and even integrate with tools like SQLMap for SQL injection testing. I walk through code examples, including capturing POST requests with parameters and saving them for further analysis. Curious to know how Bambdas can enhance your penetration testing? 📖 Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dtSK-heX #CyberSecurity #PenTesting #BurpSuite #Automation #Scripting

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) are two different approaches to identifying and mitigating security vulnerabilities in software applications. They serve complementary roles in an overall application security strategy. Here's a brief overview of each: Static Application Security Testing (SAST): Overview: SAST is a white-box testing method that analyzes the source code, bytecode, or binary code of an application without executing it. Timing: Typically performed during the development phase of the software development life cycle (SDLC) or in the early stages of quality assurance. Analysis: SAST tools scan the application's source code, configuration files, and dependencies to identify potential security vulnerabilities, such as code injection, insecure dependencies, and other coding errors. Advantages:Early detection of vulnerabilities in the codebase. Integration into the development environment for real-time feedback to developers. Helps identify issues before the code is deployed. Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST): Overview: DAST is a black-box testing method that assesses the security of a running application by simulating attacks and analyzing the application's response. Timing: Typically performed in later stages of the SDLC, such as after the application is deployed or during pre-production testing. Analysis: DAST tools interact with the running application, sending requests and analyzing responses to identify security vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers. This includes issues like input validation errors, session management problems, and misconfigurations. Advantages:Mimics real-world attack scenarios. Provides insights into how vulnerabilities may be exploited in a live environment. Can be used to assess the security posture of deployed applications. Key Differences: Timing: SAST is performed earlier in the SDLC, often during development, while DAST is typically conducted later, during or after deployment. Scope: SAST analyzes the application's source code, while DAST interacts with the running application as a black-box test. Detection Method: SAST identifies potential vulnerabilities by analyzing the code, whereas DAST identifies vulnerabilities by actively testing the running application. Realism: DAST provides a more realistic simulation of how an attacker might exploit vulnerabilities in a live environment. In practice, a comprehensive application security strategy often involves both SAST and DAST, as they complement each other by addressing different aspects of the application security landscape. This combination helps provide a more thorough assessment of an application's security postur