Vipin Kumar’s Post

#Gnosisosis: "The doctrine of Lucifer, or Luciferianism, is a belief system inspired by Gnosticism, based various religions and myths associated with Venus, the morning star, traditionally known as the "light bearer" or Lucifer", "not detested but revered", inversions of reality, we have all been lied-to, beginning 1666, getting a big boost December 16, 1811... -1812Project: ...nepotism of inheritors have infiltrated every institution, hiding behind our religions, playing both sides of every "wars, plagues. famine, repeat" cycle of passed down ignoramce, just to further desttroy our forefather's advancements, leaving this entire population suffering devolution, by design... ...& IF we're unable to realize how we've all been 'taken for a ride', IF we allow this behavior to continue, in all truth, this 'human-race' has beeen run, exactly what all this deviant behavior has been attempting to achieve,& along with electrical-disease, parasites, environmental-toxins, poisons,.. all the psyops, prropaganda has been humanities greatest downfall... -rid the falsified-narratives, relive reality- -remember- Kinetic Induction: https://lnkd.in/gvNyUumM "bring back our lost Antiquitech, find the truths behind the myths"

dr.charif noureddine on: 3/9/2021 AD. * Causes of conflict: resources and wealth. power and decision-making. cultural, social and political identity. respect and appreciation. Preserve the traditions, customs and mores. Values represented by religion and ideology. * History of the conflict: The idea of a clash of civilizations is an idea that the West came to us, forgetting that human civilization is one that relied in its composition on the findings of nations and peoples in various fields of life, which depended in its foundation on three axes “production, accumulation, and then wealth” in thought, agriculture, trade, industry and other components of nature.  Humanity and on these data built human civilization.  The clash of civilizations is a form of dialogue between cultures as a result of their multiplicity, meaning that human civilization passed through five stages or regimes that were dominant over the idea and its ruling ideology and the main component of its history and culture over the various ages, which eventually led to a terrible conflict that reached the utmost levels of tyranny and human tyranny. * Generations of conflict wars: - The first generation began after the confrontations between the colonial countries and the Ottoman Empire, which was called in its last days the sick man of Europe... - The second generation, it appeared in close periods of time, during the First World War, where the second generation wars are known as that type of war that is characterized by preemptive strikes with artillery and aircraft... - The third generation, it was developed by German forces in the First World War as well, and the third generation wars do not depend on the power of arms, as much as they depend on the elements of speed, surprise, and mental manipulation of the opponent, seeking to reach the depth of the enemy and destroying it from within, and planting spies, rather than clashing  And the third generation wars did not only lead to a change in war tactics, but also aimed at changing the military culture as well, as individual initiatives became more important than blind obedience and the implementation of orders. Fourth generation: It focuses on the cultural and cognitive factor of the enemy’s strengths, to turn them into weaknesses that are easy to attack, and cause heavy losses. part-2

Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow   Livres audio Audible – Version intégrale https://amzn.to/42AmSv7 Yuval Noah Harari, author of the best-selling Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, envisions a not-too-distant world in which we face a new set of challenges. Now, in Homo Deus, he examines our future with his trademark blend of science, history, philosophy and every discipline in between. Homo Deus explores the projects, dreams and nightmares that will shape the 21st century - from overcoming death to creating artificial life. It asks the fundamental questions: where do we go from here? And how will we protect this fragile world from our own destructive powers? This is the next stage of evolution. This is Homo Deus. War is obsolete. You are more likely to commit suicide than be killed in conflict. Famine is disappearing. You are at more risk of obesity than starvation. Death is just a technical problem. Equality is out - but immortality is in. What does our future hold?

WhatIRead: Michael Mann, On Wars, Yale University Press, 2023. This is a seminal work about the causes, the patterns and the social dynamics of war. There have been wars since states and social classes began to form, and there is, Mann tells us, “no long-term or short-term trend toward either more or less war” (482). Mann, who analyses wars from a sociological and historical perspective, concludes that the causes of war and the motives of rulers have not changed so much, nor have the fears and emotions of soldiers on the battlefield, and post-war. But different types of war, particularly of offensive war – raiding, regime change wars, wars over border territory, or wars for imperial conquest – occur more or less frequent in different periods of history. A major part of Mann’s analysis deals with the rationality of decisions that rulers take about war and peace. Rulers usually think that their decisions are rational, and they often calculate the means they need for their war effort. Decisions to go to war, however, are regularly influenced by overconfidence, an underestimation of the righteousness and the morale of the antagonist, emotions and ideologies, domestic politics, “baked-in” militarism and the “tyranny of history”, i.e., path dependencies in contexts shaped by previous wars. The ends sought by war – be that economic gain, status and glory, or domination – are more often not reached than reached. And at least for twentieth-century wars, aggressors seem to have lost considerably more wars than they won. Mann’s summary therefore is both a moral and an empirical one: “If humans and their rulers were predominantly rational beings, there would be far fewer wars” (1).

Tao Te Ching – Verse 57 If you want to be a great leader, you must learn to follow the Tao. Stop trying to control. Let go of fixed plans and concepts, and the world will govern itself. The more prohibitions you have, the less virtuous people will be. The more weapons you have, the less secure people will be. The more subsidies you have, the less self-reliant people will be. Therefore the Master says: I let go of the law, and people become honest. I let go of economics, and people become prosperous. I let go of religion, and people become serene. I let go of all desire for the common good, and the good becomes common as grass. (translation by Stephen Mitchell, 1995) -+-+-+- Govern a country with upright integrity Deploy the military with surprise tactics Take the world with non-interference How do I know this is so? With the following: When there are many restrictions in the world The people become more impoverished When people have many sharp weapons The country becomes more chaotic When people have many clever tricks More strange things occur The more laws are posted The more robbers and thieves there are Therefore the sage says: I take unattached action, and the people transform themselves I prefer quiet, and the people right themselves I do not interfere, and the people enrich themselves I have no desires, and the people simplify themselves (translation by Derek Lin, 2006) -+-+-+- Rules create rule-breakers. War creates crimes of war. Stop. Laws create lawlessness. Poverty creates weaponry. Rank creates discord. Stop. One Sage, doing Nothing, Plants the seed of Peace. Peace can lead to illumination. Illumination is Nothingness: No gain, no loss, Zero. This heaven, sleeping a Light Sleep, Waits patiently. Never having left, It is experienced when time is Right. But right time knows no time. (translation by Jeremy M. Miller, 2013) -+-+-+-

"In addition to other benefits, for purposes of our discussion here this control over war provides the masters the ability to reduce large portions of the human population that are directly involved in this war or indirectly associated with it. It follows, the bigger the war, the greater the coverage for killing off more people and the easier it will be for the masters to hide the true purpose of population control behind the justifications for that war–whatever those may be. Like we discussed previously, this is where propaganda comes into play: convincing the people to accept and believe the storyline behind the “need” to go to war whilst keeping them from realizing the true reason for the war...I didn’t think of it like that. That the masters could use war as a cover for population control because most people believe the propaganda for why the war is necessary and fail to realize this is just an excuse to reduce the population in the area of conflict." (Excerpt from The Great Purge, p. 26) Are the masters culling the population? How are they exterminating people? How do they ensure no more people are made? Many people seem oblivious about the depopulation agenda and those who are aware seem incapable of doing anything about it. Is this because the human race was engineered to be slaves—programmed to obey their masters to the point of self-destruction? These serious questions with existential implications are scrutinized in detail in this book, The Great Purge, from the series The Sage and the Seeker. The reader must decide for themself on the merits of the arguments. GET YOUR COPY TODAY at https://lnkd.in/grVfAcDb. #norsequill #thegreatpurge #depopulation #culling #thinningthehumanherd #extermination #controlreproduction #thefourhorsemenoftheapocalypse #conquest #war #conflict #fighting #slaverace #extinctionevent #sicksociety #humanlivestock #manipulation #opportunists #itsjustbusiness #masters #slaves #stoic #stoicism

𝙵𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝙰𝚕𝚍𝚞𝚜 𝙷𝚞𝚡𝚕𝚎𝚢, 𝟷𝟿𝟺𝟼: "..... 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲...𝗜𝗳 𝗜 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗸, 𝗜 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗮 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗱 𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲. Between the utopian and the primitive horns of his dilemma would lie the possibility of sanity - a possibility already actualized, to some extent, in a community of exiles and refugees from the Brave New World, living within the borders of the Reservation. ... But Brave New World is a book about the future and, whatever its artistic or philosophical qualities, a book about the future can interest us only if its prophecies look as though the might conceivably come true. From our present vantage point, fifteen years further down the inclined plane of modern history, how plausible do its prognostications seem? What has happened in the painful interval to confirm or invalidate the forecasts of 1931? ..... All things considered it looks as though Utopia were far closer to us than anyone, only fifteen years ago, could have imagined. Then, I projected it six hundred years into the future. Today it seems quite possible that the horror may be upon us within a single century. That is, if we refrain from blowing ourselves to smithereens in the interval. Indeed, unless we choose to decentralize and to use applied science, not as the end to which human beings are to be made the means, but as the means to producing a race of free individuals, we have only two alternatives to choose from: either a number of national, militarized totalitarianisms, having as their root the terror of the atomic bomb and as their consequence the destruction of civilization (or, if the warfare is limited, the perpetuation of militarism); or else one supra-national totalitarianism, called into existence by the social chaos resulting from rapid technological progress in general and the atomic revolution in particular, and developing, under the need for efficiency and stability, into the welfare-tyranny of Utopia. You pays your money and you takes your chance." - everyone knows of the book but I also liked the foreword by Huxley in my book at least. You can read it in its totality here:https://lnkd.in/d5vYZisn

DO THEO-POLITICS TO PERCEIVE GEOPOLITICS Part 1 Bill Click It is not only natural that we seek to understand the world around us, it is necessary. As Christians we hold the truths of Christ revealed in the word of God as our boundary for every moral application of how to proceed. With that firmly in place, there’s still something greater: the true perception of God Himself, that- unless we are privy to it in the degree He will reveal it- limits us to natural ideas, agreements and efforts which fail not only to bring about the desired changes, but cause us to fail to live up to His “eternal purpose” (Eph.3:9-12). Ultimately, we are headed to the Second Coming. Because this is no longer an event which is long and far ahead, we must see natural events through the lens of not only our current circumstances, but as inseparable from requiring us to steadfastly move toward the goal of body maturity which is to be commensurate with the coming of the Lord (Eph.5:25-32; see also 4:11-18). We must begin to rightly perceive politics, nationalities and worldwide events through the Word of God, not just through the events themselves by history, consensus and proposing strategies based in natural wisdom. In other words we need to walk with God in Theo-politics, not just with others in efforts at geopolitics. A Theo-politics: biblically based because our lives are Christ centered, will remind us that- at every instance- there is ultimately no political solution (only God). Today-even among the most biblically based, politically aware, visible voices influencing believers, the answers are being attempted through natural thinking. Even though such thinking is biblically informed, it is politically understood.

A Call for Global Solidarity and Accountability in Addressing Historical and Contemporary Atrocities” As I reflect on the painful history of humanity, my thoughts are drawn to the immense suffering caused by atrocities like genocide. This term, often associated with the Holocaust, represents a tragic reality faced by many communities across the world. It’s not just the story of one nation or people; it’s a shared human tragedy. The horrors of King Leopold’s regime in the Congo, where 17 million lives were lost, echo this sentiment. This part of history, largely untold, lacks the cinematic representation often seen in Hollywood. Similarly, Chairman Mao’s regime led to the deaths of 56 million Chinese, and Stalin’s post-World War II actions resulted in 26 million deaths in the Siberian Gulags. These numbers aren’t just statistics; they represent individual lives, families, and shattered communities. Mankind, it seems, is its own worst enemy, prone to self-destruction and hatred. Turning to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it’s evident that the era of unexamined actions and total exoneration is over. The world is taking a closer look at the actions of all parties involved. The shock and realization that no nation is above scrutiny is a significant step toward accountability. In this light, I urge countries like China and Russia, along with non-aligned nations, to support the creation of a new state that includes Palestinians, within the regions of Israel and Gaza. This is not just a political move but a moral imperative. It’s time for the global community to come together, setting aside political alliances, to address these injustices and work towards a future where such atrocities are a thing of the past. In conclusion, sanity, goodwill, and a higher moral compass are essential for the survival of mankind. The creation of a new state, coupled with responsible leadership, could pave the way for healing and reconciliation.