Despite widespread outrage over inequalities across the ideological spectrum, these inequalities persist. Why, then, are we not more united in our determination to eliminate them?
Consider English football as an example.
When plans for a European Super League were announced in 2021, fans quickly mobilised, united in their outrage at what they saw as a threat to the fairness and integrity of the sport. Yet, in stark contrast, there is no comparable unity when addressing racism in football. Fans often tolerate, ignore, or even perpetuate discriminatory behaviour.
One possible explanation for this inconsistency comes from economist Milton Friedman, who said: “A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the hands of people who use it to promote their own interests.”
I think in other words, efforts to impose equality can backfire, leading to division rather than solidarity. This may explain why, despite widespread frustration with inequality, there is little consensus on how to address it, particularly when different groups prioritise different freedoms or interests.
This view may not be popular, but as the saying goes, "Actions speak louder than words."
#inclusion #leadership #criticalthinking #racism
Inclusion, Culture and Social Impact. D&I Expert Consultant @ FiA. Trustee & Founder @ Larsen's Pride childhood cancer charity.
3mo🙌