Robert Martin 👨🏻‍💻’s Post

View profile for Robert Martin 👨🏻‍💻, graphic

VP of Technology, Oil City Iron Works, Inc. | Forbes Technology Council | Gartner Peer Community | Web Author

Talk about an ethical nightmare in medicine... "I think the bottom line is that NRP violates foundational ethical norms around the determination of death and should not be pursued," University of Colorado bioethicist Matthew DeCamp told NPR It is certainly easy to agree with Mr. DeCamp. If doctors can restore blood flow by choice, and by choice restrict blood flow from the brain, did they really do everything medically possible to save you in the first place? If the tables were turned, though; if my child was on a transplant list with no available organ, it would be hard not to support NRP; especially if the result was a healthy organ for my child. I pray I never have to make that decision. Some additional thoughts: 1. There is already too much #GodComplex in medicine. 2. There is already too much "err on the side of profit" in medicine. 3. The difference between "prolonging life" and "saving life" may need to be considered. No matter how many days you add to a person's life, they will eventually die. 4. These days people cannot agree on the definition of life, as it relates to conception and birth. How are people going to agree on this? https://lnkd.in/g7xnPwZK

Doctors Restoring Bloodflow in Legally Dead Bodies to Retrieve Donor Organs

Doctors Restoring Bloodflow in Legally Dead Bodies to Retrieve Donor Organs

futurism.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics