#SeniorCare is at a pivotal moment. As the global population rapidly ages, we must prioritize this sector to adequately prepare for the influx of older patients. While the federal government's interest in improving care standards for the nation's aging population is a step in the right direction — it's critical that we take a thoughtful approach that results in meaningful action. The #StaffingMandate, as proposed, risks setting the senior care sector back. Elderly populations and their families already struggle with care access; adding burdens — such as unfunded staffing requirements on facilities already struggling to find support — won't improve outcomes. A thoughtful approach must consider current challenges, staffing shortages, and costs. I'm eager to see how public feedback could shape the final decision.
After 60 days of public debate, the comment period on one of the most controversial federal healthcare regulations ended earlier this week. Many leaders spoke up against the proposed #StaffingMandate, citing that a one-size-fits-all approach would not improve patient care. Costing nearly $4 billion annually, with no funding component, the proposal failed to consider two major components: the ongoing #StaffingShortages and high associated costs. On Monday, AHCA/NCAL submitted its final comments on the proposed mandate. The organization noted that without proper resources and planning, #NursingHomes could be forced to downsize, resulting in the displacement of nearly 300,000 residents from their current living situation. Additionally, countless others could find themselves further from the care they need. Read what other advocacy and provider groups have to say in McKnight's Long-Term Care News this #WTWPCC: https://bit.ly/3SweEBc
VP Business Development
11moWilliam Charnetski Love this company!!