Yohanneti RWH, ST, MM, CRP’s Post

View profile for Yohanneti RWH, ST, MM, CRP, graphic

Beneath the soil, where resources lie, Oil and gas empower, reach the sky. Sustain our land with energy grace, Domestic strength, in every embrace.

#TaskForce2 #CrudeOilHandling #ExploitationPhase #PREFEED #FEED #ConceptualDesign #ProcessSafetyConcern #RiskMitigation Process safety engineers play a crucial role in providing recommendations for safe crude oil handling during the exploitation phase of oil and gas operations. Conduct a thorough hazard identification process specific to crude oil handling during the exploitation phase is A MUST!. This activity can be conducted in Pre-FEED, it means from the initial phase of the project. Identify potential hazards, including those related to the characteristics of the crude oil, process equipment, and operational activities. Certainly, perform a comprehensive risk assessment to quantify and prioritize identified hazards. Assess the likelihood and consequences of potential incidents, considering factors such as process conditions, equipment integrity and human factors. Another important sequence is ensuring that relevant process safety information including the properties and characteristics of the crude oil, is accessible and well documented. Furthermore, to ensure proper material selection for equipment used in crude oil handling, such as separators, pumps, and pipelines. Identify and address potential sources of equipment failure that could lead to safety incidents. Material concerns due to plugging in existing facilities caused by high asphaltenes and high wax handling crude oil handling during the operation phase can lead to various challenges. Increased risk of corrosion and erosion due to the abrasive nature of particles of asphaltenes will affect to the accelerated degradation of pipelines, valves, and other equipment leading to the potential leak and failures. Deposition of wax and asphaltenes particles on the surfaces of heat exchangers, separators, and pipelines will affect to reduced heat transfer efficiency, increased pressure drops, and operational disruptions due to plugging. Compatibility of existing materials with high asphaltenes and high wax crude oil will affect to potential material degradation. Whilst, integrity of protective coatings on equipment surfaces will affect to deterioration of coatings due to the presence of aggressive components, leading to increased maintenance and recoating requirements. Suitability of insulation, and or heat tracing (optional) materials for preventing wax solidification will effect to additional costs for effective insulation to maintain temperature and prevent plugging. The necessity of regular testing and monitoring of material integrity will increase cost associated with non-destructive testing, corrosion monitoring, and inspection programs. Addressing material concerns requires a holistic approach that combines proper material selections, maintenance practices, and when compulsory modifications to existing facilities.

Rommy Basyasky

Electrical Engineer, IPM | Mining & Metals

10mo

great

Like
Reply
Fazri Awaludin

Process Safety | Loss Prevention | Upstream Offshore & Onshore Oil - Gas | Petrochemical | FLNG | Industrial Gases

10mo

Nice post Yohanneti RWH, ST, MM, CRP What is the method of risk assessment that you commonly use in the Pre-FEED stage? As you know, in the Pre- FEED stage we have very limited data and many assumptions.

Like
Reply
Bambang Wisnu Murti

Instrument and Control (Lead Engineer/PMT/Interface/Package) - ENI WHP, Tangguh LNG, Package Prefab Building, Copper Smelter, Topside Platform, FPU, Pipeline etc.

10mo
Like
Reply
Darmawan Ahmad Mukharror

Process Safety Expert + Shark Behavior Scientist | Pioneer of Process Safety + Shark Diving in Indonesia | PhD Candidate in Process Safety | Adjunct Lecturer in Process Safety Master Program at Universitas Indonesia

10mo

Luar biasa ibu Yohanneti RWH, ST, MM, CRP mampu memotret situasi dengan baik. I emphasize the current situation in Indonesia: One of the common problems in Indonesia is the quality of hazard identifications and risk assessment. Since 2021s, the growth of process safety studies or audit taken place is exponential, yet the quality of process safety consultants nor their numbers have not been improved significantly. Whats the consequences? There are lot of so called facilitators nor process safety consultants were actually incompetent. Indonesia is in emergency situation of lack of quality of process safety consultants If these traits have been achieved by company, then I suggest company set up vetting process for all process safety consultants to be hired by company. Only those who are competent can therefore work for the company’s process safety projects / studies / audits as facilitators / consultants. I give example: one vetting process of selection of HAZOP facilitator which have been conducted in 2019 (by one of biggest oil and gas company in the world) for their HAZOP Revalidation in Indonesia: of the 25 HAZOP facilitators participated during vetting process, only two were qualified! 2oo25!!!

Yantua Valentino Hutagalung

Lead. Instrument & Control System Engineer at PT. Bina Reka Cipta Utama (BiRU)

9mo

Excellent 🤞

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics