In response to the positive steps taken by state lawmakers over the weekend towards housing production in NYC, former NYC deputy mayor for housing economic and development Alicia Glen concludes her op-ed by stating "...We will need to take a hard look at the outcomes of this package and be prepared to make changes. And we must keep making the case for the tools, federal resources, State legislation, and private capital necessary to make a real dent in the problem." Another step lawmakers can take in making a dent in the lack of housing problem is to vote to remove the state requirement that CPACE projects must show $1 saved for every $1 spent. In the NYC CPACE program, this is known as the "Savings to Investment Ratio (SIR)". The SIR requirement has played a significant role in why there has only been THREE CPACE loans closed in NYC in the past half-decade that the program has been in existence. The dearth of CPACE in NYC is not due to lack of interest, trust me. It is because deals die on the vine due to SIR. Many states do not have SIR requirements, so why should NY? As NYC developers ramp up their projects and seek capital (because after you have an incentive program in place, you still need to find a way to pay for construction!), lawmakers need to seize the opportunity in making CPACE more easily available to finance energy efficient improvements in this high interest rate environment. #CPACE
"The new 485-x tax incentive program, which replaces the expired 421-a, is mission-critical to New York City. Without it, no mixed-income rental projects would be built." Read my op-ed in Crain's New York Business:
Well said!! I couldn’t agree more.
Architecture, Construction and Development
11moCPACE!!!