Deciding on AI: Deploy vs. Build for Enterprise Success
Deploying vs. Building AI Solutions for Enterprises
Enterprises are in the midst of a transformative era, where AI holds the promise of solving immediate business challenges and unlocking new opportunities. In our previous article, we discussed how to identify AI use cases within your organization to drive immediate value.
In this dynamic landscape, decision-makers face a critical choice: should they deploy existing AI solutions or embark on the journey of building custom solutions tailored to their specific needs? This pivotal decision significantly impacts not only the trajectory of AI adoption within an organization but also its long-term success. Let's look at the nuances of deploying versus building AI solutions and explore the key decision points that guide enterprises on this transformative journey.
Deploying AI Solutions: The Path of Expediency
For many enterprises, the allure of deploying AI solutions lies in its expediency. Off-the-shelf AI solutions offer ready-made answers to pressing business challenges without the need for extensive development cycles or specialized expertise. By leveraging pre-built AI solutions, organizations can swiftly integrate AI capabilities into their existing lines of business, thereby accelerating time-to-value and gaining a competitive edge.
Decision-makers opt for deploying AI solutions when:
While deploying AI solutions offers a pragmatic approach to addressing immediate business challenges, it's essential for enterprises to weigh the trade-offs carefully. For certain use cases, off-the-shelf solutions may lack the level of customization required to fully align with unique business processes and objectives, potentially limiting their effectiveness in the long run.
Building Custom Solutions: Tailoring AI to Fit
In contrast to deploying off-the-shelf applications, building custom AI solutions empowers enterprises to tailor AI capabilities precisely to their unique requirements and preferences. This path involves the development of bespoke models, datasets, and applications, crafted to address specific business challenges. While the journey of building custom solutions demands greater investments of time, resources, and expertise, it may be suitable for extremely tailored solutions.
Enterprises opt for building custom solutions when:
While building custom AI solutions offers flexibility and potentially a strategic advantage, it's not without its challenges. The development process entails inherent risks, including cost overruns, technical complexities, and uncertainties surrounding scalability and maintenance. Moreover, the shortage of AI talent presents a formidable obstacle for enterprises embarking on the journey of custom development.
Decision Points: Balancing Expediency and Customization
The decision to deploy or build AI solutions hinges on a myriad of factors. Here are some key decision points that guide organizations in striking the delicate balance between expediency and customization:
It's also important to note that an organization may opt to deploy in certain use cases (e.g. private copilot) yet choose to build for others.
In conclusion, the journey of AI adoption is rife with opportunities and the decision to deploy or build AI solutions carries profound implications for enterprises. By carefully weighing the decision points organizations can navigate this transformative landscape with confidence, unlocking the full potential of AI to propel them towards a brighter future.
🔑 takeaway: opt to deploy an off-the-shelf solution for common use cases but consider building when a deeply customized solution or model is required.
Founder & CEO 🖥️ RFP & RFI automation for large teams 🤖 Automate the RFP & DDQ response process to deliver more wins with less work 🚀
7moBuild vs. Buy, the evergreen discussion! I love that AI tooling has become so democratized, which leads to option 3: Build then Buy. Even if you have the internal capabilities and *do* build an internal application, you might reasonably conclude that the cost of going from "decent pilot" to "solid enterprise app" or the ongoing maintenance effort is not worth the cost. If you then decide to buy a commercial product you will do so as a highly informed consumer. Some orgs may also take a "Buy then Build" approach, but that will usually come about because the commercial products fall short of their needs in practice, not as part of an intentional strategy.
Data Strategy Engagement Specialist | Cloud Infrastructure, AWS, GCP, VMware, Nutanix
7moThe last section, decision points, trumps the whole article. There needs to be an actual data strategy, not a back-of-the-napkin sketch. As part of that strategy, you need data quality, design, interaction, and governance before bringing business use cases to the table. Thanks for giving me a topic for next week. The Data management framework. :) #ai #data #datastrategy