ESG is relevant yet riddled with contradictions in context of workplaces - why is that?

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations have gained significant traction in recent years as the world grapples with mounting environmental challenges, social inequality, and corporate governance issues. ESG criteria have emerged as a powerful framework to assess a company's impact beyond financial metrics, aiming to promote sustainable practices and responsible corporate behaviour. While the concept is undeniably relevant, it is not without its contradictions, especially in context of workplaces. This article delves into the reasons why ESG is crucial but still faces challenges and contradictions in its application towards design and construction.

ESG as a Catalyst for Sustainability

ESG has brought about a paradigm shift in the business world by urging organisations to go beyond short-term profit maximisation and adopt long-term, sustainable strategies. Emphasising environmental impact, social responsibility, and transparent governance practices within the world of work, ESG creates a holistic approach (at least on paper!) that considers all stakeholders, from those who write the cheques (if there is still such a thing) and employees to local communities (if there was a practical consideration) and the planet (for those who do care).

But there are contradictions which can't be ignored!

1. Ambiguous Definitions and Metrics

One of the main reasons for contradictions in ESG is the lack of standardised definitions and metrics across industries and regions. Different organisations may interpret ESG factors differently, leading to inconsistent reporting, comparisons and practical applications. This lack of uniformity makes it difficult for decision makers, suppliers and stakeholders to assess solutions on a level playing field and may hinder the achievement of overarching sustainability goals.

2. Trade-offs between E, S, and G

Balancing environmental, social, and governance factors can be challenging, as improving one aspect may inadvertently compromise another. For instance, a company striving to reduce its carbon footprint might face higher professional and construction costs, which could impact cost plans and project assessment. I am yet to experience a RFP that puts ESG criteria higher than costs, company stability or process. Striking a harmonious balance among these three pillars remains a complex and ongoing challenge.

3. Greenwashing and Social Washing

The rise in ESG popularity has also given way to greenwashing and social washing practices in design and construction world, where companies and suppliers overstate their environmental and social efforts to improve their public image without meaningful action. This deception not only undermines the credibility of ESG initiatives in our sector, but also dilutes the impact of genuine sustainability efforts.

4. Short-term versus Long-term Focus

Incentivising ESG goals requires balancing the need for short-term 'high fives' to keep stakeholders satisfied with long-term sustainable strategies. Striving to meet immediate financial targets might sometimes conflict with the time and resources required for sustainable projects - both from client and supplier sides. How can you truly embed ESG when your workplace decisions are in favour of the lowest bidder?

5. Diverse Stakeholder Expectations

In complex businesses, especially if you are a PLC, Stakeholders have diverse expectations from companies when it comes to ESG. Some prioritise climate change initiatives, while others may emphasise labor rights or board diversity. Managing these competing expectations while aligning with the company's core values can lead to tensions and contradictions in ESG strategies.

In conclusion

Despite the contradictions and challenges it faces, ESG remains a relevant and essential framework for promoting sustainability and responsible corporate behaviours in the world of design and construction for corporate workplaces. The contradictions arise due to the complex nature of ESG factors, diverse stakeholder demands, and the lack of standardised definitions and metrics. Addressing these contradictions requires collaboration between clients and professional services teams, improved transparency, and greater industry-wide alignment. As ESG evolves, embracing a continuous improvement approach will be key to navigating the complexities and ensuring that ESG's true potential to create positive change is fully realised. The world of work has gone through a rapid transformation since Covid. It's now time to align on ESG and do the next right thing.