Fed enters policy purgatory
Powell repeated “wait and see”.
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) – the policy setting arm of the Federal Reserve – voted unanimously to keep the target rate at 4.25% - 4.5%, the same as in December. The statement following the meeting was more hawkish than the previous statement, categorizing the labor market as solid and removing the line on inflation progress. Chairman Jay Powell tempered that sentiment in his statement and comments at the press conference that followed.
The Federal Reserve is really in a sort of policy purgatory, given the phrases that Powell used during the press conference. His answers were peppered with the phrases “wait-and-see,” “waiting to see,” “on hold,” “not in a hurry,” and “will patiently watch,” throughout the press conference. In short, the Fed doesn’t know what is next, given the uncertainty surrounding the new administration’s agenda.
Powell said that the slate of policies – tariffs, immigration, fiscal and regulatory - is still in flux. He played down the uncertainty, saying this always happens with a new administration. Powell was clearly attempting to avoid making news with the press conference.
Four new Fed presidents rotated onto voting positions in the FOMC: Three are known hawks; one is a dove. That likely accounted for the gap between the tenor of the statement, which was more hawkish, and that of the press conference, which was more balanced. Powell tends to be more dovish than his colleagues but that could easily shift.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Powell was asked about the president. He was clearly prepared to block all questions about the president and his desire for rate cuts. The only thing he confirmed was that he had not spoken with the president yet.
Bottom Line:
The Fed is stuck where it is for now. It is still data-dependent and will not move until it sees a shift in the data. The January employment report could come in weak due to the epic fires in California; that will not shift the Fed’s decision in March. Inflation data between now and then is poised to improve due to a deceleration in shelter costs and easier year-on-year comparisons.
It is unclear whether it would be enough to get the Fed to cut rates in March, but it remains a possibility. We also have the possibility of rate cuts being front-loaded due to the length of time it takes for tariffs, tax cuts and curbs to immigration to work their way through the economy.
The Fed's heavy reliance on lagging indicators could lead to a delayed response in cutting rates, potentially stalling economic momentum. With inflation cooling and real-time data suggesting easing pressures, waiting too long risks unnecessary strain on businesses and consumers. A more forward-looking approach is needed.
University Lecturer of Finance @ SUNY Brockport | PhD in Sustainability Studies | MS Finance
2moPurgatory or savvy economic policy?
Seasoned Legal Executive with 35+ years in financial services. Key player in bank growth from <$10BB to >$110BB assets. Expert in corp gov, reg compliance, and strategic transactions. Fintech innovator.
2moLet's say FMOC drops target rate this year to 3.75-4.00. It seems much attention is being given to whether the Fed will go lower, as requested by POTUS. What if inflation becomes untamed, employment remains steady, and POTUS doesn't have his way? When will borrowers' stop asking how low will rates go and start asking when will rate increases begin? On that day, will fear of missing out on an interest rate cycle low point accelerate refinancing decisions?
Economics & Finance Professor
2moFed needs to keep inflation below 2.0%