Hybrid Workplace Design: Don't Make This Mistake

Hybrid Workplace Design: Don't Make This Mistake

In the rush to embrace hybrid work models, many organizations have fallen into a common trap when redesigning their workplaces. The focus has overwhelmingly been on accommodating peak occupancy days - typically Tuesday through Thursday - when the majority of employees choose to come into the office. While this approach seems logical on the surface, it overlooks a critical aspect of the hybrid work experience: the low-occupancy days that bookend the workweek.

The emphasis on designing for high occupancy is understandable. Companies want to ensure they have enough space, amenities, and collaborative areas to support the influx of workers on busy days. They invest in flexible furniture, bookable meeting rooms, and state-of-the-art technology to facilitate seamless collaboration between in-person and remote team members. These elements are undoubtedly important, but they address only part of the hybrid work equation.

How can the workplace fail on low occupancy days?

What's often neglected is the consideration of how the workplace functions and feels on low-occupancy days, typically Mondays and Fridays. This oversight can lead to a range of issues that negatively impact the employee experience and, ultimately, the success of hybrid work strategies.

Low occupancy can create several challenges:

  1. Lack of energy and atmosphere: A sparsely populated office can feel eerily quiet and lacking in the buzz that many associate with a productive work environment. This can be demotivating for those who have made the effort to come in.
  2. Reduced opportunities for spontaneous interaction: With fewer people present, the chances for serendipitous encounters and impromptu collaborations - often cited as key benefits of in-office work - are diminished.
  3. Inefficient space utilization: Large, open areas designed to accommodate peak occupancy can feel cavernous and wasteful when mostly empty.
  4. Increased costs: Running and maintaining a full-sized office for a fraction of the workforce is not cost-effective.
  5. Psychological impact: Employees may feel isolated or question the value of coming into a near-empty office, potentially leading to decreased engagement and attendance over time.

These issues can create a self-reinforcing cycle. If employees have consistently poor experiences on low-occupancy days, they may be less inclined to come in on those days in the future, exacerbating the problem.


Making the low occupancy workplace experience better

So, what can be done to address these challenges and create a workplace that functions well across varying occupancy levels?

  1. Flexible space division: Implement systems that allow for easy partitioning of the office. This could involve movable walls or screens that can be used to create more intimate spaces on low-occupancy days.
  2. Activity-based zoning: Designate specific areas for different types of work, ensuring that even on quieter days, there are concentrated hubs of activity.
  3. Smart scheduling: Encourage teams to coordinate their in-office days to maintain a more consistent occupancy throughout the week.
  4. Dynamic lighting and climate control: Use smart building systems to adjust lighting and temperature based on occupancy, creating a more comfortable and energy-efficient environment.
  5. Curated experiences: Plan events, learning opportunities, or social activities for typically quieter days to incentivize attendance and create a sense of community.
  6. Flexible floor closure: For multi-floor offices, consider closing certain floors on low-occupancy days, concentrating activity and reducing operational costs.
  7. Neighborhood-based layouts: Design the office in neighborhood-style clusters that can function independently, allowing for partial office closure without disrupting those who are present.

The importance of designing for low occupancy cannot be overstated. A well-designed hybrid workplace should be able to flex and adapt to varying levels of occupancy while consistently providing a positive, productive experience for employees. By neglecting the low-occupancy scenario, organizations risk undermining the very flexibility and choice that make hybrid work attractive.

Moreover, as companies continue to evaluate their real estate needs in light of hybrid work, the ability to efficiently manage and utilize space across all occupancy levels becomes a critical factor in cost management and sustainability efforts.

In conclusion, while it's natural to focus on accommodating peak demand, the true test of a successful hybrid workplace lies in its ability to provide a compelling and effective environment regardless of how many people are present. By giving equal consideration to both high and low occupancy scenarios, organizations can create workplaces that truly support the ebb and flow of hybrid work, enhancing employee experience, fostering engagement, and ultimately driving the success of their flexible work strategies. The workplace of the future must be as dynamic and adaptable as the workforce it serves - on every day of the week.

Contact us to learn more about the Next Workplace Insight: a quick and easy tool to benchmark your workplace against other organisations

Robert Garrett

Forward thinking workplace project in support of new ways of working

1mo

So true-everyone designs for the peak occupancy; I’ve never heard a discussion about designing for the low days. The other challenge is leadership-too often there’s a reluctance to lead a conversation with their people about balancing attendance across the whole working week.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics