Recruiting Your Diverse Slate
At this point, we’ve discussed why diversity matters and how to understand where you really are today. You’re probably ready to get down to business – to start fixing some of the problems you’ve identified and put diversity to work in the right way, because you know it’s important to solve your most important problems. It’s time to start talking about hiring your high-performance team.
Who you put in which job is one of the most critical decisions a leader makes.
Let’s state the obvious: to achieve a diverse team, you need a diverse set of candidates for every job.
But as simple as this first step seems, this is unfortunately where people get stuck, right at the starting gate. If you’ve sat in a hiring meeting, you’ve no doubt heard these complaints and excuses:
“Everyone who is qualified for this job is a man.”
“I can’t find candidates who are different.”
“Every resume that came through is for a white person.”
These statements undoubtedly feel real to the people making them but, as the leader, you have to make it clear: it is not acceptable to present a list of candidates who all look the same. When people tell you that they can’t find a diverse slate of good, qualified candidates, you need to tell them: “Keep looking. Try harder. Come back when you have found a good, diverse slate.”
Yes, you may need to look in new places. Where do you start? I’d recommend you ask a diverse set of people in your company and in your community: “Where should I look for qualified candidates?” You may be surprised at the answers you get when you talk to more people.
Another simple step you can take is to use blind resumes in your recruitment process. Block out all the clues that give away gender, ethnicity, and other demographic factors – and go purely for candidates who demonstrate the right skills. You could also take this a step further and consider a universal application or qualification sheet that is more focused on application of skills than specific experiences or length of time doing a certain job.
Maybe you’re thinking to yourself that you’ve been the person tasked with recruiting candidates and that you haven’t been able to find a diverse slate of qualified candidates. If you’re that person, then I’m here to tell you: “Keep looking. Try harder. Come back when you have found a good, diverse slate. Find new places to source candidates. Talk to more people.”
Sometimes the most inspiring thing a leader can do when the going gets tough is to stick to their guns, stick to the plan. “No, we are not changing course. This is important. It’s our plan. And we’re going to follow through.”
That may mean that you need to provide more time and support as the hiring process takes longer. That’s okay – if diversity truly is your goal, then you must set up a system and a process – and make the investments necessary – to support an effective hiring process.
Finding a diverse slate of candidates is the most important step in hiring to build a diverse team – but it’s obviously not the only step. You still have to work through the actual decision-making process, and that means evaluating options and assessing risk. We’ll talk more about that in my next post.
--
4yI'm very disappointed that Carly Fiorina backed Trump. She knew better, just went along with the rest of the Republican sheep, even though he is a threat to our form of government.
I supported her in her efforts to run for office not too many years ago, but I'm embarrassed that I was ready to support her only to see her turn on American Capitalist freedom loving americans. So sad.
Sr. FP&A Financial Analyst
4yThis is a fantastic read. An important point conveyed is for leaders to move from being advocates of diversity to being insistent on diversity. That's a whole different level of leadership commitment. At the beginning of the pandemic, D&I personnel were the first to be laid off. According to the Washington Post, diversity jobs fell 60% compared to 49% for other HR jobs. Is that an indicator of commitment? Also, a subtle but very important phrase Ms. Fiorina used is "Diverse Slate". An HBR study showed that if only one woman or minority is being interviewed, the chances of them being hired is next to zero. It didn't matter how many or how few candidates were being interviewed. The reason stated is that people are naturally cautious about choosing (hiring) something different than the rest. With two minority candidates in the slate, their chances of being hired improved by 193%. The argument of not enough qualified women or minorities to interview is weak. A stronger question is why don't they apply to my ads? Or, is the image of my company unwelcoming to them?
currently retired, hobby-photography, former refueler at Mercury Air, Ski Shop owner Galena Ski, Fencing -Decking Contra
4yWonderfully put and so many won't even see it! I'm sharing it on my facebook. PLEASE run for office California needs some common sense
Carly - love your comments about sticking to your guns and what that implies about looking harder and deeper. You also reference the potential step of blinding resumes. Both of these steps point to what I've thought of as two legs of the stool: supply (looking harder to find diverse candidates-however you define diversity); and demand, (doing the work to identify and become aware of implicit biases that prevent the hiring of diverse candidates. The third leg of the stool is power. We need to begin to also address the inherent, systemic, and sometimes unconscious ways in which we keep individuals (particularly women and people of color) out of the power structure of our companies.