The Resume Conundrum: Is Our Talent Acquisition Model Fundamentally Flawed? Let's Fix It Together
BluTech 2023

The Resume Conundrum: Is Our Talent Acquisition Model Fundamentally Flawed? Let's Fix It Together

Today, let's journey down a road less traveled by my previous articles. This time, I'm not serving you a solution on a silver platter; rather, I'm laying out a complex problem that's plaguing our industries. And guess what? I need YOUR collective wisdom to reshape the narrative.

Recently, during a thought-provoking discussion with my wife about the generational variances in resumes—how Boomers and Millennials prioritize different credentials—I found myself contemplating an unsettling question: Is our current model for talent acquisition fundamentally flawed?

When Algorithms and Keywords Fail Us

As a hiring manager, I've often had to request specific resumes that were filtered out by our HR algorithms. Large companies employ a rather straightforward process: Create a job description filled with buzzwords, feed it into an HR system, and then disseminate it to the masses. We receive an avalanche of applications that have to be sifted through. But are these keyword-based screenings truly efficient? Do they capture the nuanced needs of a position or the intrinsic value a candidate could bring?

The Buzzword Dilemma

What about the candidate? Is their responsibility merely to concoct a resume that juggles the right buzzwords, artfully summarizing decades of experience in a page or two? Are we making impossible demands on a document that, at its best, can only offer a superficial understanding of someone's capabilities?

Networking Over Algorithms

Let's be real: Haven't we all observed that new hires often bring in people they know? Why? Because there's inherent value in human-vetted recommendations. They offer insights into a candidate's personality, work ethic, and whether they're a 'by-the-book' or a 'get it done, no questions asked' type of individual. But how do we mimic this human element in cases where there’s no one to offer a personal recommendation?

The Pricey Headhunter Route

Headhunters, of course, offer a solution, but at what cost? Are their fees justifiable? Moreover, have we given these professionals the full scope of what we're really looking for?

AI: The Promise and Pitfalls

And what about the growing influence of AI in talent acquisition? Does an AI-driven algorithm truly understand the various factors contributing to a candidate’s potential success?

Help Wanted: Your Thoughts

As someone who's had the privilege of sitting on both sides of the hiring table, I can attest that my best experiences have come from interpersonal connections. But how do we extrapolate this to a broader, more systematic approach?

Your perspectives are invaluable. We need to foster a richer dialogue around this issue to truly innovate and make headway. So, whether you're a hiring manager, a frustrated job applicant, or anyone in between, I want to hear from you. What are your thoughts on the inefficiencies of the current hiring processes, and more importantly, how can we collectively address them?

Let's disrupt the status quo and collaboratively pave the way for a more effective, humane talent acquisition model. The floor is yours.

Michael Mendolia

CTO, Sensor Solutions at Leonardo Electronics, Inc.

1y

While it's generally considered unconventional to comment on one's own article, I'm especially keen on initiating an open, constructive dialogue and gathering actionable feedback on this topic. It's important to consider the limitations of a resume when it comes to truly understanding someone's skill set, work ethic, or thought process. A resume can offer a snapshot of experience and qualifications, but it falls short of revealing the depth and breadth of an individual's capabilities and contributions. In many cases, we end up relying on our pre-established networks—colleagues we've worked with, mentors we've learned from, or industry peers we've interacted with—to give us an informed perspective on a person's true professional value. Are we, then, underutilizing LinkedIn by not fostering conversations that delve into intricate business matters or processes? This could be an incredibly useful avenue for vetting not just 'what' someone knows, but also 'how' they think and approach complex challenges. Is our limited participation due to time constraints, hesitance to share 'trade secrets,' or simply a lack of awareness about the potential value of such discussions?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Michael Mendolia

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics