Why the Best Leaders Focus on Recognition Instead of Criticism

Why the Best Leaders Focus on Recognition Instead of Criticism

Recognition is an art and a skill that's essential in leadership. However, managers fall into two distinct groups when it comes to providing recognition in the workplace

Group #1 is managers who provide little to zero praise to their employees. Want proof? Only 33% of employees feel they receive adequate recognition for their work.

Group #2 is managers who go out of their way to show appreciation. It's as if they know that 83% of employees say recognition affects their motivation at work, and employees who feel recognized are four times more likely to be engaged. 

We would have more managers join group two if they would buy into the principle; small acts of recognition turn into big changes in productivity and performance. 

Small acts of recognition turn into big changes in performance.

Recognition Over Criticism 

Recognition, in the context of leadership, refers to appreciating team members' efforts, behaviors, and contributions. Effective recognition involves specific and authentic feedback that promotes the positive behavior you want to reinforce and encourage moving forward. Said differently, recognition is fuel to continue winning behavior.

Recognition is fuel to continue winning behavior. 

However, many managers fall into the criticism trap instead of recognition. While critical feedback has a place in improving performance, it's sad when managers only look for what's wrong instead of right.  If managers only knew that looking for what's right requires just as much work as looking for what is wrong, maybe they would change.  

If that wasn't enough, criticism tends to fall into the fear bucket, whereas recognition falls into the reward bucket. When something causes fear, our brains default to inaction. When something is a reward, our brain defaults to action.

Fear causes inaction. Reward creates action.

You can think of it like this: 

Recognition = Fountain

Criticism = Drain

Like that old adage: you get to decide if you are a fountain or a drain.  The best leaders are a fountain, not a drain. So be a fountain, not a drain.

Research suggests managers should give five times the amount of recognition to criticism to be highly effective.

How to Give Recognition That Matters

When people know they did wrong, they avoid you. When they think they did right, they seek you.  Finding employees to recognize shouldn't be hard. However, since giving recognition isn't a strong suit for most managers, here are ways to improve:

1. Make it Personal

People are wired differently. Some people would do anything for their name to be recognized publicly, and for others, it could make them want to crawl into a hole. The point is that the best leaders make recognition personal in order to make it meaningful. This requires a personal relationship and a strong bond of mutual trust.  

Great leaders make recognition personal in order to make it meaningful

2. Emphasize Process-Oriented Behavior

People have a high BS meter today. So, instead of offering generic praise, pinpoint exactly where the team member exceeded the standard. For example, instead of saying, "good job," you would say, "The effort you demonstrated in a difficult situation today was inspiring to me and your teammates." This shows that you are paying close attention to their effort and truly value specific contributions. 

Be intentional about emphasizing what the team member did to deserve the recognition, regardless of how big or small. Instead of just focusing on the result of their work, focus on the process-orientated behavior that produced it. It could be things like their attitude, effort, or coachability. The point is that no process-oriented action is too small to be recognized.  

Great recognition focuses on the behavior that produced the outcome, not the result itself.

3. Discuss the Impact

Highlight their behavior's impact on the team, organization, or themselves. This is critical and often forgotten or assumed. Unless you work in sales, it can be difficult to draw a direct correlation between behavior and outcome. However, the more leaders talk about the real impact, the longer the recognition lasts.

The more you talk about real impact, the longer the recognition lasts.

Team members need to know that their work is meaningful and creates an impact that might go well beyond money. Take time to spell out what good things happened or could happen because of their extra effort. 

Closing

Recognition is an art and skill that is essential in leadership.  There is nothing soft about being the kind of leader who provides authentic praise to teammates for the right kind of effort or outcomes.  If this isn't something you have done well, don't beat yourself up.  Just remember, small acts of recognition turn into big changes in performance. 

Ready to Boost Your Productivity? The most important decision you make every day is what you focus on. Get the 64-Day Excellence Planner to help you stay focused on the most important things and achieve your goals.

Guide to Inspiring Your Employees: Want to be an inspirational leader? You can download the guide to inspire employees for free.

The Leadership Lens Newsletter: If you like this newsletter, you will love John's three weekly leadership principles. Join over 20,000 readers of the Leadership Lens Newsletter for free.

About the Author John Eades is the CEO of LearnLoft, and creator of the Accelerate Leadership Program. He was named one of LinkedIn’s Top Voices. John is also the author of Building the Best: 8 Proven Leadership Principles to Elevate Others to Success. You can follow him on Instagram @johngeades.

I love this piece very well said and I support you John As an accounts person and having the experiences, there is a huge criticism then recognizing a staff member, 3points points well for good leadership Agree:#leadership #management #recognition #buildingthebest #humanresources #coaching #successg #career #litrendingtopics

Moses Wilson

International Consultant -- Information Management Officer(Digital Preservation Project) UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany

7mo

The article highlights two groups of people. Managers and Leaders. Not all Managers are Leaders, and it's suffice to say not all Leaders are Managers either. Leaders may choose to recognize their productive staff either openly or privately. These Managers know that recognizing their staff helps the team achieve much more than anticipated. These recognized staff psychologically becomes enthusiastic and encouraged to deliver, abundantly above expectations. Other staff at the lower end of the achievement table emulate the productive spirit of their colleagues and upgrade their output. Leaders provides objective criticism only for the good of the individual. Mainly to see the staff grow and succeed. It's all a win, win situation between the organization and the staff.

Marie Harper

Higher Education Advocate

7mo

I agree, but I have a question. Why do we put the burden on the manager to figure out what needs to be done? Each employee can be motivated by different things. Therefore, I believe there should be some level of involvement for both parties in order to make the experience rewarding.

Like
Reply
Angeli Marie Gonzales Siswandi

Expert in Travel & Hospitality, Guest Service & Client Engagement / Forward thinker in HR Employee Relations/ People Leader advocating servant leadership, EEO & DEI, aPHR certified

7mo

Thanks for sharing

Mohamed Kavaf

Seasoned B2B Sales Leader | 15+ years experience | Surpassing targets and driving revenue growth | ERP Sales | Media sector expertise | Committed to delivering strategic value in competitive markets

7mo

John Eades I definitely agree 👌

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by John Eades

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics