Correcting nearly 1,000 errors has been just one part of maintaining a dialogue with Observer’s faithful readers

As human rights abuses in Egypt increase, the government is labelling the journalists who try to tell the truth as terrorists

A Comment piece by Nick Cohen prompted widespread anger

Checking facts is more important than ever as fake news becomes the refuge of the angry

Is it hypocritical to criticise a company in print while taking money for advertising its products?

Giving the full picture of a dispute between the charity and some of its tenants

Finding that fine balance between supplying information and providing inspiration to a copycat attacker

The importance of not using outdated, patronising, insensitive language and expressions

Attitudes to disability are shifting at last, which makes it disappointing that stereotypes have been unwittingly dredged up in coverage of a film on the issue

Stephen Pritchard: The most memorable news images might not be violent – they might not even be real – which is why the media should consider carefully how they illustrate their stories

Sometimes there is so much rage that a mature debate is impossible

Occasionally, as deadline approaches, standards can slip

A new strategy is aiming to counter an unacceptable level of toxic commentary on our website

Words are powerful, which is why we take care with how we report matters

While broadly sympathetic to Labour, the Observer has never slavishly attached itself to any party or political philosophy

British Muslims feel they are too often associated with extremism, with little attention paid to their positive contribution to society

Some believe the word migrant has become a derogatory term

How the International Shugden Community took exception to the Observer’s reporting of its activities

To capitalise or not to capitalise. You decide

The process of consultation that contributes to the Observer’s election leader is nothing if not open and democratic