Delhi HC dismisses plea challenging mandatory registration of doctors with DMC

Rule was issued to curb menace of professional misconduct by medical practitioners, DMC tells court

Updated - March 02, 2024 10:41 am IST

Published - February 28, 2024 01:58 am IST - New Delhi

The High Court’s order was issued on February 22. File

The High Court’s order was issued on February 22. File | Photo Credit: The Hindu

The Delhi High Court has rejected a plea challenging a notice of the Delhi Medical Council (DMC) making it mandatory for doctors practising allopathy in the Capital to be registered with it.

“The intent of making the medical practitioner amenable to the regulatory jurisdiction of the State Medical Council of State in which he/she practises is in public interest,” the court said in its order dated February 22.

It noted that the rule enables the State medical council to hold accountable erring medical practitioners for their wrongful conduct and take disciplinary against them in accordance with law.

Responding to a public interest litigation filed by Namit Gupta who sought quashing of the December 24, 2023 public notice issued by DMC, the High Court said there was no merit in the plea.

The DMC notice directed that all medical establishments, including hospitals, nursing homes, polyclinics, charitable dispensaries, and diagnostic centres, ensure the validity of DMC registration of the doctors before utilising their services and to ensure that the DMC registration of the doctors working therein is renewed every five years as per the DMC Act.

The DMC’s counsel submitted that the notice has been issued to curb the menace of professional misconduct by medical practitioners practising in the national capital.

The High Court said the petitioner’s contention that it would be inconvenient for a medical practitioner to seek transfer to a new state medical council in case of a transfer of job, is “without any basis”.

It said the regulations provide for a convenient web portal-based procedure for seeking transfer of registration to another state medical council and also provide for a mechanism of deemed approval. There is no basis for alleging that the process of transfer and registration is inconvenient, the court observed.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

  翻译: