Private resorts move HC against allotment of fewer seats to their guests for safaris in Nagarahole and Bandipur National Parks

Petition alleges allotment of fewer number of seats to the guests of private resorts in State-owned Jungle Lodges and Resorts vehicles or allotment of seats in dilapidated condition

Updated - November 22, 2022 04:32 pm IST - Bengaluru

Tourists and wildlife enthusiasts go on a jungle safari by Forest Department at Nagarahole National Park.

Tourists and wildlife enthusiasts go on a jungle safari by Forest Department at Nagarahole National Park. | Photo Credit: MURALI KUMAR K

The High Court of Karnataka on Monday ordered issue of notice to the State government on a PIL petition complaining about discrimination in allotment of seats to the guests of private resorts in the jungle safaris conducted in Nagarahole and Bandipur National Parks by the State-owned Jungle Lodges and Resorts Ltd. (JLR).

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Prasanna B. Varale and Justice Ashok S. Kinagi passed the order on the petition filed by Karnataka Eco-Tourism Resorts Association, Waterwoods Lodges and Resorts Pvt Ltd., Orange County Resorts and Hotels Ltd., Kabini Holiday Homes Pvt Ltd., and Karnataka Wildlife Resorts Pvt Ltd.

It has been alleged in the petition that fewer number of seats were allotted to the guests of private resorts for the jungle safari in the vehicles operated by JLR and also the vehicles, in which the seats are allotted to their guests, were in dilapidated condition.

Earlier agreement

The petitioners, quoting earlier round of litigations in the High Court over permission for safari for their guests, have said that the State authorities had agreed in writing with them to provide at least 50% of the seats in the safari for the guests in the private resorts. However, this arrangement has now be given a go by as only a few seats are allotted to them.

This discrimination, the petitioners have claimed, has not only affected their interests but also impacted livelihood of local people employed in the private resorts. The petitioners have said that they had set up resorts based on the State’s Wilderness Tourism Policy.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

  翻译: