Two-finger test: Madras HC warns doctors of being guilty of misconduct if they continue to perform it on victims of sexual assault

Justices S.S. Sundar and Sunder Mohan “notice regrettably” a doctor of a government hospital in Chennai having performed the test in 2020 on a 15-year-old girl subjected to aggravated penetrative sexual assault by her father

Published - November 22, 2023 12:33 am IST - CHENNAI

The Madras High Court on Tuesday warned doctors of being found guilty of misconduct if they continue to perform a ‘two-finger test’ or per vaginum examination on victims of sexual assault, despite a series of judgements passed against it by the Supreme Court since 2013.

Justices S.S. Sundar and Sunder Mohan were shocked to find a doctor at a government maternity hospital in Chennai having conducted the two-finger test in March 2020 on a 15-year-old girl who had been subjected to aggravated penetrative sexual assault by her father.

Arguing an appeal filed by the convict, senior counsel R. Rajarathinam pointed out that the medico-legal examination report read: “Pubic hair normal. Hymen not intact. Easily permits 2 fingers. Cervix pointing downwards, uterus anteverted, normal size, fornices free, no bleeding.”

He wondered how the doctor could have conducted the two-finger test despite the Supreme Court in Lillu alias Rajesh versus State of Haryana (2013) having held that medical procedures should not be carried out in a manner that constitutes cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment and that health should be of paramount consideration while dealing with gender-based violence.

“Undoubtedly, the two-finger test and its interpretation violate the right of rape survivors to privacy, physical and mental integrity, and dignity,” he quoted the Supreme Court as saying.

Concurring with his submissions, the Division Bench led by Justice Sundar said: “We notice regrettably that a two-finger test had been conducted in the instant case, though the Supreme Court and this court, in several cases, have repeatedly held that such a test is neither acceptable nor desirable to ascertain whether the victim was subjected to sexual intercourse.”

Authoring the verdict, Justice Mohan wrote: “We take this opportunity to remind the doctors that if they conduct any test in contravention of the directions of the Supreme Court in the State of Jharkhand versus Shailender Kumar alias Pandav Rai (2022), they shall be guilty of misconduct.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

  翻译: