Intel Xeon Refresh: New Cascade Lake Refresh CPUs up to 60 Percent Cheaper Per Core
Intel takes an axe to pricing
Intel introduced its new lineup of Cascade Lake Refresh Xeon server parts today and they bring along remarkable price reductions compared to the existing Xeon lineup, with the top-line changes to the company's flagship models amounting to a ~60% reduction in per-core pricing in exchange for the inability to scale beyond two sockets. Paired with Intel's other recent price adjustments, a 28-core SKU that used to weigh in at $13,012 now retails for a mere $3,950.
Intel also introduced more subtle changes to its mid-range processors with dual-socket models that feature more cores, cache, and higher frequencies at the same price points as previous-gen models that support more sockets, along with several new workload-optimized parts.
- Intel Cascade Lake Xeon Platinum 8280 Review: Taking the Fight to EPYC
- Intel Announces Socketed 56-Core Cooper Lake Processors
- Intel Drops 10nm Tremont Atom P5900, Diamond Mesa eASIC, 'Edgewater Channel' Ethernet 700 Series
The Cascade Lake Refresh lineup initially came as a bit of a surprise given Intel's pending release of its Cooper Lake server platform that is slated to begin production in the first half of 2020, but the company says the refresh processors offer a more direct upgrade path for existing Xeon Scalable customers and will require little re-validation work, and, more importantly, that Cooper Lake remains on schedule.
Overall, Intel says the Cascade Lake Refresh processors offer an average of 36% more performance and 42% better performance-per-dollar compared to the first-gen Xeon Gold lineup, serving as an obvious counterblow to AMD's EPYC Rome data center processors. First, let's take a look at the most noticeable adjustments on the high-end parts.
Cascade Lake Refresh Brings up to 60% Gen-on-Gen Price Reduction Per Core
SKU | Core/Thread | Base/Boost (GHz) | Price - Price Per Core | % Change | Cache (MB) | TDP |
Gold 6258R | 28 / 56 | 2.7 / 4.0 | $3,950 - $141 | -60% | 38.5 | 205W |
Platinum 8280 | 28 / 56 | 2.7 / 4.0 | $10,009 - $357 | N/A | 38.5 | 205W |
EPYC Rome 7742 | 64 / 128 | 2.25 / 3.4 | $6,950 - $108 | N/A | 256 | 225W |
Gold 6248R | 24 / 48 | 3.0 / 4.0 | $2,700 - $112 | -57% | 35.75 | 205W |
Platinum 8268 | 24 / 48 | 2.9 / 3.9 | $6,302 - $262 | N/A | 35.75 | 205W |
EPYC Rome 7642 | 48 / 96 | 2.3 / 3.2 | $4,775 | N/A | 256 | 225W |
Intel added two new processors to the upper end of the Gold series, boosting the mid-range lineup from a maximum of 24 cores to 28, but the two flagship refresh models (denoted with an "R" suffix) pop off the page.
The Gold 6258R has the same specifications, including core count, base/boost frequencies, and 205W TDP as the current Xeon Platinum 8280 flagship, but Intel has reduced pricing from a comparatively eye-watering $10,009 for the 8280 to a mere $3,950 for the 6258R. That's a reduction of roughly 60%.
We also see a similar 57% reduction for the Gold 6248R, which comes with the same accommodations as its comparable sibling, but also comes with an additional 100 MHz base and boost frequency. That equates to a faster processor at a significantly lower price point.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
The tradeoff? All Refresh models lose support for servers with four or more sockets (4S+), but the 4S(+) server market is much smaller than the standard dual-socket server market, so these price trimmings should benefit the majority of Intel's data center customers. The new Cascade Lake Refresh processors are based on the same 14nm process and architecture as the existing Xeon Scalable models, so they support the full roster of features like DL Boost and AVX-512, but Intel says the existing processors will remain on the market for customers interested in 4S(+) systems.
The new tier of processors will be helpful in the battle with AMD's EPYC Rome processors, which feature higher core counts at lower price points, along with increased PCIe connectivity (up to 162 lanes in some dual-socket configurations), not to mention the benefits of the PCIe 4.0 interface that is twice as fast as the PCIe 3.0 interface on Intel's server parts.
Key parts of the PCIe 4.0 ecosystem, like the first wave of enterprise-class SSDs, are finally headed to market, giving AMD a connectivity advantage, particularly in the single-socket server space where it wields 128 lanes of PCIe 4.0 connectivity compared to Intel's maximum of 48 lanes of PCIe 3.0. As such, these adjustments will improve Intel's price-to-performance ratio for not only the vast majority of its customers with dual-socket servers, but also for those that invest in Intel's own bustling single-socket server ecosystem.
Intel also recently removed its "M" tier of server processors, which commanded a $3,003 premium over standard models as a fee for stepping up to 2TB of memory capacity per chip. That support now comes free of charge and equates to a sizeable price cut in its own right because it doubles the memory capacity for standard models. AMD still leads in this area with support for up to 4TB of memory per socket, which comes free of charge. Intel also offers "L" models that support 4.5 TB of memory, but these chips now cost an additional $3,003 instead of the previous $7,987 markup over the base models. Intel tells us it made this move to lower the bar for customers interested in Optane DC Persistent Memory DIMMs, but that also means that a Platinum 8280L that retailed for $13,012 now has an equivalent processor that retails for a mere $3,950, albeit at the loss of support for 4S(+) configurations.
Mid-Range Gold Series
SKU | Cores / Threads | Base / Boost | Price | $ Per Core | % Reduction | Cache | TDP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold 6246R | 16 / 32 | 3.4 / 4.1 | $3,286 | $205 | -25% | 35.75 | 205W |
Gold 6246 | 12 / 24 | 3.3 / 4.2 | $3286 | $273 | n/a | 24.75 | 165W |
Gold 6242R | 20 / 40 | 3.1 / 4.1 | $2,529 | $126 | -20% | 35.75 | 205W |
Gold 6242 | 16 / 32 | 2.8 / 3.9 | $2529 | $158 | n/a | 22 | 150W |
Gold 6240R | 24 / 48 | 2.4 / 4.0 | $2,445 | $102 | -25% | 35.75 | 165W |
Gold 6240 | 18 / 36 | 2.6 / 3.9 | $2445 | $136 | n/a | 24.75 | 150W |
Gold 6238R | 28 / 56 | 2.2 / 4.0 | $2,612 | $93 | -21% | 38.5 | 165W |
God 6238 | 22 / 44 | 2.1 / 3.7 | $2612 | $119 | n/a | 30.25 | 140W |
Gold 6230R | 26 / 32 | 2.1 / 4.0 | $1,894 | $73 | -23% | 35.75 | 150W |
Gold 6230 | 20 / 40 | 2.1 / 3.9 | $1894 | $95 | n/a | 27.5 | 125W |
Gold 6226R | 16 / 32 | 2.9 / 3.9 | $1,300 | $81 | -45% | 22 | 150W |
Gold 6226 | 12 / 24 | 2.8 / 3.7 | $1776 | $148 | n/a | 19.25 | 125W |
Gold 5220R | 24 / 48 | 2.2 / 4.0 | $1,555 | $65 | -25% | 35.75 | 150W |
Gold 5220 | 18 / 36 | 2.2 / 3.9 | $1555 | $86 | n/a | 24.75 | 125W |
Gold 5218R | 20 / 40 | 2.1 / 4.0 | $1,273 | $64 | -20% | 27.5 | 125W |
Gold 5218 | 16 / 32 | 2.3 / 3.9 | $1273 | $80 | n/a | 22 | 125W |
Silver 4215R | 8 / 16 | 3.2 / 4.0 | $749 | $94 | -6% | 11 | 130W |
Silver 4215 | 8 / 16 | 2.5 / 3.5 | $794 | $99 | n/a | 16.5 | 85W |
Silver 4214R | 12 / 24 | 2.4 / 3.5 | $694 | $58 | 0% | 16.5 | 100W |
Silver 4214 | 12 / 24 | 2.2 / 3.2 | $694 | $58 | n/a | 16.5 | 85W |
Silver 4210R | 10 / 20 | 2.4 / 3.2 | $501 | $50 | 0% | 13.75 | 100W |
Silver 4210 | 10 / 20 | 2.2 / 3.2 | $501 | $50 | n/a | 13.75 | 85W |
Intel's new mid-range Gold Series models offer a mixture of increased core counts, cache, and frequencies across the breadth of the portfolio. Many of these processors come at the same price point as their predecessors, but with beefier accommodations.
For instance, the Gold 6346R comes with four more cores than the Gold 6246, but also lands with the same $3,286 price point, which equates to a healthy 25% reduction in price-per-core. Intel has also long bifurcated its stack by adding more L3 cache in tandem with cores, topping out at the maximum available amount of cache for each die based on core counts. Apparently Intel has shied away from that practice, at least in key sections of its portfolio, and provides a big increase in L3 cache over the previous-gen chips.
These trends reverberate down the stack with significant increases in L3 cache capacity in nearly every model, implying that Intel uses its 28-core XCC silicon (38.5MB of L3 cache) for some products where it previously used 18-core HCC die (24.75MB L3 cache). You could view this in two ways: Either Intel is selling considerably more silicon area at a lower cost than it did previously, which would lead to lower margins, or the new SKUs allow the company to harvest die with defects in the 4S(+)-enabling UPI connections that it couldn't use otherwise, thus realizing some cost benefit. It could even be a mixture of the two, based upon demand.
The addition of more cores in the respective price bands leads to higher TDP envelopes at each price range, and we would typically expect that to equate to a lower base frequency so the company can squeeze within the confines of the TDP rating despite the heightened thermal output. However, Intel has mostly increased base frequencies, with the exception of two SKUs (5218R and 6240R) that decline 200 MHz (but you get four and six extra cores, respectively, in exchange). That speaks to the power of Intel's incessant optimizations to its 14nm node.
Intel also did a solid job of increasing boost frequencies, with increases from 100 MHz to 500 MHz (dependent on SKU), with the lone exception being a 100 MHz decline for the 6246R.
Intel says these alterations benefit customers that run virtualized clouds, hyper-converged infrastructures, and network function virtualization. Of course, the lower pricing will certainly be welcome for nearly any workload. Again, Intel's previous-gen Gold 6238 and 6240 also came as "L" models that commanded an additional $3,003 for 2TB of memory support, but now that feature comes standard on the refresh models, making these chips more of a gen-on-gen savings than apparent in the table above.
Cascade Lake Refresh Performance Optimized SKUs
SKU | Cores / Threads | Base / Boost | Price | Cache | TDP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold 6256 | 12 / 24 | 3.6 / 4.5 | $3,900 | 33 | 205W |
Gold 6250 | 8 / 16 | 3.9 / 4.5 | $3,400 | 35.75 | 185W |
Gold 6208U | 16 / 32 | 2.9 / 3.9 | $969 | 22.00 | 150W |
Silver 4210T | 10 / 20 | 2.3 / 3.2 | $554 | 13.75 | 95W |
Bronze 3206R | 8 / 8 | 1.9 / 1.9 | $306 | 11.00 | 85W |
Intel also rolled out five new models with no direct previous-gen comparables, and the Gold 6256 and 6250 (note the lack of the "R" suffix) come with a 4.5 GHz turbo boost, a new height for Intel's Xeon lineup. That extra frequency, paired with a healthy dollop of L3 cache, positions these processors well for high frequency trading, HPC, databases, and simulation and modeling workloads. You'll pay for that advantage, though, with the eight-core 16-thread Gold 6250 weighing in at $3,400.
We also see the addition of a T-series model that crams a fat 10 cores and 20 threads into a skinny 95W TDP envelope, while the non-hyperthreaded Bronze 3206 brings the value end of the lineup up to eight cores from six.
Thoughts
With over 30 million units sold already, Intel's Cascade Lake Xeon Scalable lineup has already proven its mettle in the market, but AMD's EPYC Rome processors have proven to be potent competitors and Intel has telegraphed its intentions to become more competitive in the face of increased competition. AMD is nibbling away at Intel's commanding presence in the data center, albeit with some challenges along the way, but it appears Intel's counterpunch comes as much lower price points for the meat of the two-socket server segment.
Meanwhile, Intel's addition of new SKUs with the highest frequencies we've seen yet allow the company to become more competitive in key market segments where it can still charge a premium due to its single-threaded prowess, and the company's expansion of workload-optimized SKUs for network virtualization should enable more penetration into the nascent 5G base station market.
Several other recent developments have also bolstered Intel's pricing relative to its competition. VMware, in a needed move in the face of rapidly increasing server core counts, recently adjusted its pricing structure to require multiple licenses for server processors with more than 32 cores. That effectively doubles the licensing fees for servers with more than 32 cores, which adds some additional cost for those adopting AMD's core-heavy EPYC Rome processors. That will be most felt in the single-socket server ecosystem. Meanwhile, Intel's general-purpose server chips tap out at 28 cores, leaving the company largely unscathed in that segment. AMD still has a powerful price-to-performance (and connectivity) story for the impacted segments, but the increase in licensing fees surely doesn't improve its position.
Intel has been besieged by a seemingly-never-ending shortage of 14nm production, but has focused on ensuring supply of its margin-rich Xeon products above all others. The company says it has adequate supply of the new Cascade Lake Refresh processors, which are available now at OEMs and ODMs worldwide. The company also announced that it has increased the number of Intel Select Solutions, a pre-validated server platform, by 60% and doubled the number of partners producing the systems.
The somewhat odd timing of the Cascade Lake Refresh might lead some to question Intel's progress on its Cooper Lake processors that will top out at 56 cores for general-purpose platforms and come with new features like second-gen DL Boost acceleration, but Intel says it remains on track for production of the first processors for the Whitley platform.
Paul Alcorn is the Managing Editor: News and Emerging Tech for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.
-
Jim90 And we have one company - and one company alone - to thank for this: AMD.Reply
Moral question...should we reward AMD by buying Intel?
Should everyone not take a step back and ask themselves: WTF, Intel, have you been doing to us for so many years?
Continuing...are you REALLY happy to have been ripped off for so long? -
Dsplover They bore me with the same cores.Reply
Love the Cache but give us Tiger Lake. Anything other than the same tiresome 14nm we’ve seen for years.
Thankfully AMD lit a fire under their butts.
Take money out of their pockets, they’ll bring us something new.
Otherwise more tiresome 450watt 14nm 30+ core crap.