Russia's CPU Substitution Plan Hits a Snag
Russian PC makers cannot get Russian CPUs from TSMC, other foundries.
Leading CPU makers AMD and Intel left the Russian market after Russia invaded Ukraine in late February, and right now it is not easy for Russian PC makers to obtain the chips they need.
There are several Russian companies that design their own processors, but those chips are made by TSMC, and Taiwan no longer allows their export to Russia. As a result, the country cannot replace foreign CPUs with its own, reports Kommersant business daily.
Russian makers of PCs and servers this year reportedly supplied just 15,000 PCs and 8,000 servers based on Elbrus and Baikal processors designed in Russia and then fabbed in Taiwan, according to Russia's Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media.
"We would have a lot more [PCs and servers based on Russian CPUs] this year if those batches of Russian processors, Elbrus, Baikals, which were ordered and produced, were shipped," said Maksut Shadayev, the head of the ministry. "Intellectual property and all documentation are Russian, but there are no production facilities in Russia that could produce those CPUs, which is why production was ordered in other countries."
The most advanced fab in Russia can produce chips on a 90nm node, whereas MCST's most sophisticated CPUs were made by TSMC on its 16nm fabrication process.
Due to restrictions imposed on high-tech exports to Russia by the United States, United Kingdom, and the European Union, leading Taiwanese companies were among the first to cease working with Russia after the country started a war against Ukraine several months ago.
In June, Taiwan's Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) officially issued its list of high-tech products that are barred from shipping to Russia and Belarus in a bid to not allow the countries to use advanced technology for military purposes. In particular, Taiwan authorities banned exports of processors that have performance of over 5 GFLOPS, operate at 25 MHz or higher, feature an external interconnection with a data transfer rate of 2.5 MB/s or over, and/or have an ALU that is wider than 32 bits. Essentially, Taiwan does not allow exports of advanced processors to Russia, so TSMC cannot ship the chips was contracted to produce for the country. And TSMC isn't the only company that can't or won't ship chips to Russia.
"Foreign manufacturers that produce processors based on blueprints of Russian developers refused to fulfill orders in 2022, including shipping already produced chips," said Shadayev, reports RBC.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
Geef 90nm? Now your making me feel sorry for them. I am pretty sure I have a 486 sitting in a box I can send them to help out and I think it was made with better than 90nm process.Reply -
Nilarium
You can keep it, there are all modern CPUs in stock in Russia . Topic was about own manufacture.Geef said:90nm? Now your making me feel sorry for them. I am pretty sure I have a 486 sitting in a box I can send them to help out and I think it was made with better than 90nm process.
Intel 486 800nm btw -
PC Hardware Nerd The last time I read about the elbrus processor, it wasn't a processor worth much outside of potential military applications iirc. Russia has plenty of countries around the world willing to get them modern processors for the right price.Reply -
torbjorn.lindgren
The various Intel 80486 was made in 1 µm to 600 nm processes!Geef said:90nm? Now your making me feel sorry for them. I am pretty sure I have a 486 sitting in a box I can send them to help out and I think it was made with better than 90nm process.
The first 90nm chips came out 2002 and were eDRAM and flash (easier to do than processors), the first wave of processors to use 90nm came out in 2004, specifically Intel Prescott (3rd gen Pentium 4), AMD Winchester (3rd gen Athlon 64) and IBM 970FX (2nd gen G5) in no specific order.
All these were still single-core processors but had on the order of 50-100 times as many transistors in them as the 80486!
The first 65nm processors came out in 2006 but the changeover is a very gradual process with an extremely long "tail", processes keeps being used almost forever in the embedded space, IIRC you can still order at least up to 600nm! chips, probably way higher too. -
Bazzy 505 this mainly to limit access to dual use components, while the restrictions may seem like to to stoneage tech, people need to realize military applications are guided by very specific mission requirements.Reply
Much of military hardware relies on and is built around technologies going far back as 80's. It is not uncommon to see "old" motorola or intel cpus in everthing from cruise missiles to jet fighters. For example the two main cpus of F22A Raptor are variants of Intel i960MX originally launched in 1984. Even modern civilian aircraft such A320,330 or even 380 have their flight management system based around licensed variants of Am29000 series from AMD which was released all the way back in 1988. -
pixelpusher220 Geef said:90nm? Now your making me feel sorry for them. I am pretty sure I have a 486 sitting in a box I can send them to help out and I think it was made with better than 90nm process.
Worse, they're still on Windows ME
Edit: Nefarious plan, we offer them a windows upgrade....to Vista! -
neojack they can easilly buy though a proxy in a friendly or poor country like Hungary, middle east, africa. it just take more time and money.Reply
Heck in theory kalashs's commerce is forbidden too, but this rifle is everywhere in 3rd world countries. I bet CPUs are easier to smuggle than assault riffles -
Murissokah torbjorn.lindgren said:The various Intel 80486 was made in 1 µm to 600 nm processes!
The first 90nm chips came out 2002...
Yeah, I remember that too. 486 DX266 was the PC I used when I was 8 or so. My college PC was 90nm, those were quite far apart. -
mitch074
90 nm was the process used for early Athlon 64 and Pentium D processors. It is ancient, but not 486-era ancient. To give you an idea, the Celeron 300A was made with a 180 nm process. The most powerful official 486 (AMD 486 DX4-120, back when AMD and GlobalFoundries were a single entity) was made using 440 nm (or 0.44 µm).Geef said:90nm? Now your making me feel sorry for them. I am pretty sure I have a 486 sitting in a box I can send them to help out and I think it was made with better than 90nm process.