China's telco companies are gradually shifting to Chinese CPUs — telecom giants switch hundreds of thousands of their servers to homegrown CPU platforms

Loongson
(Image credit: Loongson)

Chinese telecom companies are gradually switching to domestic CPU platforms by raising their procurement of servers based on CPUs from Huawei, Hygon, or Loongson, reports state-controlled Global Times. Purchases by telco giants like China Telecom, China Mobile, and China Unicom significantly support developers of Chinese-made processors and the country's strive for self-sufficiency. But there is a big catch.

Everyone wants a 'G-series' server with a Chinese CPU inside

 China Telecom plans to acquire 156,000 servers, 67.5% of which are 'G-series' and equipped with Chinese-made CPUs. This is a substantial shift from four years ago when only 19.9% of the company's servers used domestic CPUs, and Intel Xeon processors dominated with a 79.4% share, according to Global Times.

The 'G-series' is a designation for a server based on a CPU (or maybe even two) formally developed in China.

China Mobile is also ramping up its support for local processors. Of their 13 server procurement tenders, ten are designated for 'G-series' projects, highlighting the company's commitment to domestic CPUs. The report says the proportion of Chinese CPUs in China Mobile's PC server acquisitions has increased from about 21% in 2020 to 43.5% recently.

China Unicon has seen a similar trend, with a notable rise in demand for domestic processors since 2020. The company has increasingly used Chinese-made CPUs, particularly models like Huawei's Kunpeng 920 and Sugon's Hygon 7165 and Hygon 7185.

Because the U.S. government has set rather strict export rules for selling high-performance processors to Chinese entities (which for now have little to do with telco giants, except, of course, blocked Huawei, but even in this case, there have been exceptions made), Chinese telecom companies are switching to domestic processors to ensure that they are not left without compute performance they need if the U.S. imposes stricter sanctions against China.

In addition, the telco giants are also seemingly trying to make their infrastructure indifferent to the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the CPUs that power it. Global Times notes that China Telecom's latest round of procurements included the selection of various processors, including x86 CPUs  and 'domestic CPU architectures such as Arm, C86, LoongArch, Yongfeng, and SW.'

But there's a catch

This is where the big catch comes in for China's advancements in client and datacenter-grade CPUs: 

  • Huawei's Kunpeng CPUs are based on a customized Arm ISA (similar to Apple's industry-leading CPU cores). Although Arm China is the source of the Arm ISA, it was developed in the U.S. and the U.K.
  • Sugon's C86 is AMD's x86 Zen with encryption-related enhancements made for China chiplets for Hygon processors in the U.S. by GlobalFoundries (even despite being added to the Entity List).
  • Although Loongson has developed a not-invented-here (NIH) attitude and claims its LoongArch is an all-new ISA, it is primarily based on the MIPS ISA.
  • Zhaoxin's Yongfeng is an x86 microarchitecture (perhaps even developed in the U.S. by a Via Technologies subsidiary).
  • Sunway's SW (Shenwei) ISA can probably be primarily considered a Chinese IP by now, but it derives from DEC's Alpha, which was demised in the 1990s.

Performance improvements, but foreign processors still dominate. But while it is impossible to say that CPUs supplied by Chinese companies all rely on technologies designed domestically, we cannot neglect that their performance has been increasing steadily over the years due to engineering breakthroughs and manufacturing capabilities.

"Chinese-made CPU chips have seen big improvements in the performance and cost-effectiveness, which meet the need of telecom operators," Chen Jing, a vice president of the Technology and Strategy Research Institute, told the Global Times on Thursday.

SMIC's 2nd Generation 7nm process technology, for example, played a huge role in Huawei's ability to regain the performance crown in China's smartphone space. 

 Despite the apparent shift towards local CPUs, foreign companies such as AMD, Intel, and Nvidia can continue to compete for procurement contracts, provided their processors meet the U.S. export regulations. They do as Nvidia is poised to earn $12 billion selling its cut-down H100 processors under the HGX H20 moniker.

A broader economic context: give us money and technology

At a press conference covering a broader economic context, Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng emphasized the importance of attracting and using foreign investment while allowing foreign technologies to enter the Chinese market. He also called for relaxing market access to high-tech restrictions to facilitate the entry of foreign capital into the Chinese market.

When it comes to the U.S. government, which is the entity that makes restrictions for China, it reasons its decisions on national security concerns as China could weaponize technologies by building weapons of mass destruction. Even without advanced technologies, China supports Russia's war against Ukraine, a country where it once wanted to get aerospace technologies.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • ThomasKinsley
    Chinese telecom companies are switching to domestic processors to ensure that they are not left without compute performance they need if the U.S. imposes stricter sanctions against China.
    I am more inclined to think it's for national security. Intel keeps getting exploits discovered on their chips and AMD isn't that much better. Exploits for domestic chips can still be found, but they force the other side to spend resources and time that they wouldn't need if existing chips with existing exploits were used.

    When it comes to the U.S. government, which is the entity that makes restrictions for China, it reasons its decisions on national security concerns as China could weaponize technologies by building weapons of mass destruction.
    Huh? They restrict China from fabbing machines and Nvidia 4090s because of WMDs? I. Don't. Think. That's. How. It. Works.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    ThomasKinsley said:
    I am more inclined to think it's for national security. Intel keeps getting exploits discovered on their chips and AMD isn't that much better. Exploits for domestic chips can still be found, but they force the other side to spend resources and time that they wouldn't need if existing chips with existing exploits were used.

    China only wants exploits that can lead to spying on its own people. Let's not forget that and the whole Orwellian "Social Credit" system that they've employed against their citizens.
    Reply
  • Ken Lek
    ezst036 said:
    China only wants exploits that can lead to spying on its own people. Let's not forget that and the whole Orwellian "Social Credit" system that they've employed against their citizens.
    Don't believe what you read in the Western news. I have lived in China for over twenty years, and the situation is very different from what CNN, NYT & WSJ depict.
    The Social Credit system is hardly noticeable in China unless you break the law or refuse to pay a debt or fine after a court judgment.
    Reply
  • nookoool
    ezst036 said:
    China only wants exploits that can lead to spying on its own people. Let's not forget that and the whole Orwellian "Social Credit" system that they've employed against their citizens.

    You haven't realized living in the "free world" that the western government controls the mass media and sponsors all types of anti-<some country> content via "human rights group", "seperatist groups", "think tanks", MIC workers.

    According to the snowden leaks 15 years ago, everyone in the west is spied on already as well :)
    Reply
  • nookoool
    China is a big exporter and has to promote "free trade" hence only goverment, edu. critical buisness are getting the stick to move to domestic at this point since they can argue National Security. To be honest, at the moment, the Chinese cpu are still not competitive in value for normal consumers. We might see a change as Huawei has apple cult status and may be able to get people onto their line of HarmonyOS computers in the near future.
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    Ken Lek said:
    Don't believe what you read in the Western news. I have lived in China for over twenty years, and the situation is very different from what CNN, NYT & WSJ depict.
    The Social Credit system is hardly noticeable in China unless you break the law or refuse to pay a debt or fine after a court judgment.
    The social credit system doesn't require exploits. All cloud service providers are simply required to deliver the data to the government via prescibed interfaces, just as are all employers, schools, public institutions, banks etc.

    The social credit system also isn't exactly new, it just used to be paper based before. Every citizen had a file that acompanied its life that the citizen itself never got to see. It went from one school to another and to your employer and recorded faithfully your performance relative to the party goals.

    What I don't know is if it's even a communist invention, it could have been similar at least for anyone not a truly insignificant peasant during imperial China.

    I think the notion behind it is quite simply that 90% of all virtue are functioning social control.

    That may seem somewhat alien to Western countries, but when social control fails, society fails, everywhere.
    Reply