Intel announces two extra years of warranty amid chip crashing and instability issues — longer warranty applies to 13th- and 14th-Gen Core processors

Intel
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Intel told us today that it will extend the warranty on its boxed Intel Core 13th- and 14th-Gen processors by two additional years. Intel's warranty extension comes as a result of the crashing and instability issues that have plagued its 13th- and 14th-Gen chips for months. Those issues impact all 65W and higher models, meaning the crashes have a widespread impact ranging from the flagship models down to even the pedestrian mid-range chips. Intel's processors typically come with a three-year warranty period, so the extension will bring the warranty for most boxed processors to five years.

Intel will issue a microcode update by mid-August to address the crashing issues, which cause PCs to crash/BSOD inexplicably during gaming and other workloads due to what Intel attributes to excessive voltage. The issue can cause permanent damage, and the pending microcode update will not 'fix' processors that already suffer from crashing. As such, users with chips that are already crashing will have to return their processors for replacement. However, Intel says the update should prevent chips that haven't experienced issues from degrading.

For now, it is unclear if CPUs exposed to excessive voltage have suffered from invisible degradation or damage that hasn't resulted in crashes yet but could lead to errors or crashes in the future. Intel's extended warranty is obviously intended to allay those fears. Intel also says it is investigating a way to enable easy identification of impacted processors. 

Intel's announcement comes as investigations of the crashing issue begin for a potential class action lawsuit. Intel hasn't shared the full details of its new warranty extension yet, but it says more details are to come. We do know that some models, like the Special Edition KS models, only have a one-year warranty, but that will now extend to three years. The two-year warranty extension applies to the boxed units found at retail, but Intel's statement says those with OEM systems should reach out to the manufacturer, hinting that we might also see extensions from OEMs.

The company apologized for its slow response and released a statement reiterating its prior statement that Via Oxidation is not the root cause of the current instability issues. Intel says it first discovered the oxidation issue, which it characterizes as "minor," in 2022. The company says it instituted fixes and enhanced screening in early 2023 and removed all impacted chips from its supply chain by early 2024. However, it does concede that some chips with Via Oxidation defects could have still been on retail shelves as recently as early 2024.

Here are the company's statements on both matters:

Intel Two-Year Warranty Extension Statement

Intel is committed to making sure all customers who have or are currently experiencing instability symptoms on their 13th and/or 14th Gen desktop processors are supported in the exchange process. We stand behind our products, and in the coming days we will be sharing more details on two-year extended warranty support for our boxed Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen desktop processors.

 In the meantime, if you are currently or previously experienced instability symptoms on your Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop system:

  • For users who purchased systems from OEM/System Integrators – please reach out to your system manufacturer’s support team for further assistance.
  • For users who purchased a boxed CPU – please reach out to Intel Customer Support for further assistance.

Intel is also investigating options to easily identify affected processors on end user systems and will provide additional guidance as soon as possible.

At the same time, we apologize for the delay in communications as this has been a challenging issue to unravel and definitively root cause. - Intel statement to Tom's Hardware.

Intel Via Oxidation Statement

The Via Oxidation issue currently reported in the press is a minor one that was addressed with manufacturing improvements and screens in early 2023.

The issue was identified in late 2022, and with the manufacturing improvements and additional screens implemented Intel was able to confirm full removal of impacted processors in our supply chain by early 2024. However, on-shelf inventory may have persisted into early 2024 as a result.

Minor manufacturing issues are an inescapable fact with all silicon products. Intel continuously works with customers to troubleshoot and remediate product failure reports and provides public communications on product issues when the customer risk exceeds Intel quality control thresholds. - Intel statement to Tom's Hardware.

Paul Alcorn
Managing Editor: News and Emerging Tech

Paul Alcorn is the Managing Editor: News and Emerging Tech for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • rtoaht
    That’s good news.
    Reply
  • vinay2070
    Thats good news, but they need to honor it. They were already rejecting the RMAs with existing warranties.
    And how does this applied to laptops, would laptop manufacturer give you 4 years CPU warranty? Who decides where the problem lies in a laptop as the chip is soldered? At this point its wise to stay away from Intel, A CPU should definitely last 5+ years.
    Reply
  • kjfatl
    vinay2070 said:
    Thats good news, but they need to honor it. They were already rejecting the RMAs with existing warranties.
    And how does this applied to laptops, would laptop manufacturer give you 4 years CPU warranty? Who decides where the problem lies in a laptop as the chip is soldered? At this point its wise to stay away from Intel, A CPU should definitely last 5+ years.
    Does Intel sell "retail boxed CPUs" in BGA packages? The solution for these customers will involve the PC manufacturer.
    Reply
  • Thunder64
    vinay2070 said:
    Thats good news, but they need to honor it. They were already rejecting the RMAs with existing warranties.
    And how does this applied to laptops, would laptop manufacturer give you 4 years CPU warranty? Who decides where the problem lies in a laptop as the chip is soldered? At this point its wise to stay away from Intel, A CPU should definitely last 5+ years.

    That's what most are suggesting at the moment. Not Tom's though. They just published an article on July 28th where they give Intel the win for "Best CPU's of 2024".

    This was pretty much a necessary move on Intel's part but I don't think it will be enough to win back much goodwill.
    Reply
  • sjkpublic
    Its NOT good news. It means there was a serious failure on Intel's part. Microcode changes may fix the issue. Or a completely new chip. Where is the warranty for the time and labor to fix this mess? BIG LAWSUIT COMING.
    Reply
  • ikjadoon
    Wow. So it's really that bad. Intel 13th & 14th gen are now infamous CPUs; people are going to remember this for a long time.

    Good that Intel is finally doing it, but this should've been Intel's stance on Day 1. I must imagine that AMD, Apple, Qualcomm, Arm, etc.—at least financially—are feeling a little giddy tonight.

    Can't wait to see the mini-documentary on this in 10 years.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    vinay2070 said:
    And how does this applied to laptops, would laptop manufacturer give you 4 years CPU warranty? Who decides where the problem lies in a laptop as the chip is soldered? At this point its wise to stay away from Intel, A CPU should definitely last 5+ years.
    Laptop CPUs, according to Intel, are not affected by the problem that is impacting the 65W+ base power desktop CPUs.
    sjkpublic said:
    Its NOT good news.
    Not necessarily as it just means the bad press was getting bad enough they felt the need to do something material. Depending on what the trigger for the degradation is it may not really cost them anything for those extra two years (keep in mind the 13900K launched in October 2022 with a 3 year warranty for boxed CPUs so the oldest are still under warranty for at least another 14 months).
    Reply
  • LolaGT
    Expected.
    There was never going to be a recall. They will RMA on a case by case basis until the warranty periods run out.
    Any other solution would be throwing many, many millions away on what is mostly perfectly good silicon.
    Reply
  • A Stoner
    The right thing to do, but comes far too late. The company can recover, but it will be painful before it does.

    I used to be a huge Intel fan, I had not owned anything not intel all the way back to the i486DX2 days until I got the AMD 7950X3D I currently have.

    Intel price/performance and power/performance metrics just simply were not favorable anymore, and stuff like this just makes the decision I made feel even better.

    Intel needs to get their power issues under control while delivering leading edge performance to lure me back. I have 3 PCs running in my home computer room, and I just cannot deal with the heat output of intel CPUs. Nothing I can do about the graphics cards, nVidia just simply cannot be replaced at the top tier.
    Reply
  • CelicaGT
    Thunder64 said:
    That's what most are suggesting at the moment. Not Tom's though. They just published an article on July 28th where they give Intel the win for "Best CPU's of 2024".

    This was pretty much a necessary move on Intel's part but I don't think it will be enough to win back much goodwill.
    Any "Best of" article on any Future PLC website is best ignored. As much as I'd like site like Tom's and others to better maintain journalistic freedom they have to post veiled advertisements like that. Other sites, like Ars Technica do a bit better job by offering paid subscriptions as well as....mmmnn somewhat unobtrusive ads (I subscribe). They also post notifications when their parent company (Conde Nast) is the subject of, directly, or indirectly, of an article, as well they should. Different markets though, Ars appeals to a much larger audience than Tom's Hardware so paid subs can make up the difference.

    (edit: clarity)
    Reply