Intel concerned about Irish energy costs says report — wants gov to subsidize renewables

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)

High energy costs in the European Union are probably among the main reasons behind the bloc's deindustrialization. Many power-hungry production facilities relocate to Asia because it has become nearly impossible for them to stay competitive with current energy prices. Ireland is not an exception, and this makes Intel very concerned (according to RTE) as it runs its major Fab 34 near Leixlip and has to make sure that the fab produces products at competitive costs. But should Intel really be worried?

Intel's Fab 34 in Ireland is the first production facility in Europe to use extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography to make chips in high volumes. The fab is capable of producing microelectronics using Intel 4 (previously known as 7nm) and Intel 3 (formerly known as 5nm) process technologies and currently produces compute tiles for Intel's Core Ultra 1-series (Meteor Lake on Intel 4) and Xeon 6 processors (Granite Rapids and Sierra Forest on Intel 3). These are premium products.

Energy prices are rising across the world, in the U.S., Europe, and Asia. However, energy prices are considerably higher in Europe when compared to Asia and the U.S. For example, rates per kWh in the U.S. range from 8.57¢ in Texas to 11.41¢ in Oregon to 12.31¢ in Arizona. By contrast, electricity costs in Ireland vary from 15¢ (night rate) to 26¢ (day rate) for commercial customers. In South Korea and Taiwan, electricity for large commercial users costs 13¢ after increases in late 2024. Therefore, it is more expensive to make chips in Ireland than in the U.S. or Taiwan, at least with respect to energy costs.

Energy Costs

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Row 0 - Cell 0 ArizonaIrelandOhioOregonSouth KoreaTaiwanTexas
kWh rate12.31 ¢15 ¢ - 26 ¢10.94 ¢11.41¢13 ¢13 ¢8.57¢

Electricity cost source links: Arizona, Ireland, South Korea, Taiwan

When it comes to multibillion-dollar semiconductor fabrication facilities, the vast majority of their costs are represented by capital expenditures, depreciation, materials, and labor. Utilities, such as electricity, water, and cooling, account for a relatively small — single-digit to low double-digit percentage — of microelectronics production costs, according to some industry estimates.

For example, Intel consumed around 9.1 billion kWh of electricity in 2023, according to the company's Corporate Responsibility Report (CSR). Intel uses green energy across all of its facilities in the U.S., Europe, Israel, and Asia, so its energy prices are a bit higher than those of average businesses. But if we assume that Intel paid 13¢ per kWh on average, then the company paid approximately $1.183 billion for electricity in 2023. Meanwhile, Intel's total revenue in 2023 was $54.2 billion and its total costs were around $32.5 billion (that includes R&D, CapEx, SG&A, depreciation, etc.).

Therefore, energy accounted for 3.64% of Intel's costs and 2.18% of Intel's product revenue. It is plausible to assume that energy costs account for approximately 5% of Intel's product costs, but that probably depends on actual products. For products like Intel's Xeon 6980P, which sells for over $12,000, the contribution of energy costs is probably negligible.

But Intel is still concerned about energy costs in Ireland, according to the report. In fact, a 'senior source' in Davos told RTE that lower labor costs in Ireland are offset by high energy costs. These high costs stem from delays in renewable energy infrastructure and the fixed expenses of offshore wind farms, which are often passed on to customers, RTE claims. To address this, Intel is advocating for the state to assume part of these costs during the development phase to ease the financial burden on manufacturers like itself, the report says.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • ekio
    Wow, talk about corruption...

    Hey, the country is not cheap enough, make your people pay for our needs then!
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Intel needs to talk to Microsoft and get a compact self contained nuclear reactor to power it. Free energy!
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    This is why I never understood TSMC going with Arizona for their new fab sites. Higher energy costs and lack of water resources, 2 very relevant inputs in the chip fab world.
    Texas, home to Texas Instruments, Samsung, Tower Semi (formerly VLSI/Philips), Qorvo (formerly Micron), TDK, NXP semi (formerly Motorola), X-Fab (formerly IBM), Skorpios Tech (formerly SEMATECH), as well as numerous smaller/specialty fab companies and fab support companies, has ~40% cheaper electricity and mass amounts of local cheap water. With the likes of the University of Texas, Texas State University, and Texas A&M, there is no shortage of trained labor, so it seems like TSMC made a poor choice in location.
    Reply
  • Thunder64
    The Historical Fidelity said:
    This is why I never understood TSMC going with Arizona for their new fab sites. Higher energy costs and lack of water resources, 2 very relevant inputs in the chip fab world.
    Texas, home to Texas Instruments, Samsung, Tower Semi (formerly VLSI/Philips), Qorvo (formerly Micron), TDK, NXP semi (formerly Motorola), X-Fab (formerly IBM), Skorpios Tech (formerly SEMATECH), as well as numerous smaller/specialty fab companies and fab support companies, has ~40% cheaper electricity and mass amounts of local cheap water. With the likes of the University of Texas, Texas State University, and Texas A&M, there is no shortage of trained labor, so it seems like TSMC made a poor choice in location.

    Qorvo was Micron? The one by me used to be TriQuint which merged with someone else to become Qorvo. I guess one of them was formlery Micron?
    Reply
  • Notton
    The Historical Fidelity said:
    Texas
    Well there are energy costs, but also reliability.
    Texas energy grid comes up in the news more often than in the eastern or western energy grid.
    And not in a good way.
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    Notton said:
    Well there are energy costs, but also reliability.
    Texas energy grid comes up in the news more often than in the eastern or western energy grid.
    And not in a good way.
    That’s not true at all, the last time the Texas grid was mentioned was in February of 2021 when the freak winter storm that broke Texas climate records came out of nowhere and froze the lubricating oil in our wind turbines (Texas never gets much past freezing normally and the oils need to be thick enough to lubricate at 110+ F, so obviously a freak storm with sustained well below freezing temps does not mix with thick oil), blocked the sun out from our solar farms, and froze the natural gas in our pipelines (again, freak low temperatures that we haven’t seen in 100 years of climate records). It was a perfect storm of rapid temperature change, 100 years temperature lows, etc..
    Right now, all the energy infrastructure owners are towards the end of enacting their 5 year infrastructure resiliency plans required by the governor after the freak winter storm mentioned above to make sure it never happens again.
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    Thunder64 said:
    Qorvo was Micron? The one by me used to be TriQuint which merged with someone else to become Qorvo. I guess one of them was formlery Micron?
    TriQuint bought their Texas fab from Micron, then merged to become Qorvo. My “formerly”’s are original owner to now because most of the middle owners no one has heard of
    Reply
  • bit_user
    The Historical Fidelity said:
    Texas, ... has ~40% cheaper electricity
    Is that year-round? From what I've heard, electricity can get very expensive during peak demand periods of the summer months.

    The Historical Fidelity said:
    and mass amounts of local cheap water.
    Is the water where they need it? Granted, I doubt it could be a worse situation than in Arizona.

    One thing AZ has going for it is closer proximity to the west coast and less time difference vs Taiwan. I'm not sure if that was a factor. I expect there's lots of communication and travel between the two.

    And when it comes to energy, I think AZ probably gets much more consistent sunlight. Definitely fewer hurricanes and big rain events.
    Reply
  • ieatfishburritos
    The Historical Fidelity said:
    This is why I never understood TSMC going with Arizona for their new fab sites. Higher energy costs and lack of water resources, 2 very relevant inputs in the chip fab world.
    Texas, home to Texas Instruments, Samsung, Tower Semi (formerly VLSI/Philips), Qorvo (formerly Micron), TDK, NXP semi (formerly Motorola), X-Fab (formerly IBM), Skorpios Tech (formerly SEMATECH), as well as numerous smaller/specialty fab companies and fab support companies, has ~40% cheaper electricity and mass amounts of local cheap water. With the likes of the University of Texas, Texas State University, and Texas A&M, there is no shortage of trained labor, so it seems like TSMC made a poor choice in location.

    Phoenix has long had significant semiconductor infrastructure and a large electronics manufacturing presence. NXP (formerly Motorola Freescale), On Semiconductor, Microchip, Intel, etc all have fab sites in Phoenix. Previously ST Microelectronics, Microsemi etc. had fabs.

    There is state-of-the-art advanced electronics packaging from Amkor and Intel, along with Aerospace & Defense electronics like Raytheon, Honeywell, Boeing, Lockheed, General Dynamics etc.

    At any rate you have your opinion and others, including TSMC have chosen Phoenix.
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    bit_user said:
    Is that year-round? From what I've heard, electricity can get very expensive during peak demand periods of the summer months.


    Is the water where they need it? Granted, I doubt it could be a worse situation than in Arizona.

    One thing AZ has going for it is closer proximity to the west coast and less time difference vs Taiwan. I'm not sure if that was a factor. I expect there's lots of communication and travel between the two.

    And when it comes to energy, I think AZ probably gets much more consistent sunlight. Definitely fewer hurricanes and big rain events.
    I’m not sure about commercial, but for residential electricity, we lock in one rate for a 12/24/or 36 month period. I currently pay 10.4 cents a kilowatt with a 24 month contract. Water is quite abundant in DFW, Austin, and Houston where most fabs are located. Texas has over 7000 lakes of 5,000 acres and up, 7 major rivers, and numerous aquifers to utilize. I agree that AZ gets more consistent sunshine, but the majority of Texas’s green energy comes from wind turbines (30GW in 2020, even more now). Texas has the largest number of wind turbines in the U.S. and would rank 5th in the world if Texas were its own country.
    Reply