Intel Core Ultra 200K CPU pricing exposed by overseas retailer — Arrow Lake priced up to 8% higher than Raptor Lake Refresh
Intel's Arrow Lake chips beat inflation.
Intel’s next-generation Core Ultra 200-series (codenamed Arrow Lake) desktop chips are rumored to arrive in October to compete with the best CPUs. With only a few weeks until the rumored launch, many retailers are likely preparing their backend systems for the arrival of these chips in their inventories and the subsequent launch. As shared by X (formerly Twitter) user Charlie, one European retailer, LambdaTek, has added Intel’s latest desktop chips to its listings. They’re already live on their website, showing us the potential prices of these CPUs.
As is customary for Intel processor launches, the K-series SKUs will launch first. The first wave of Arrow Lake chips includes the Core Ultra 9 285K, Core Ultra 7 265K, Core Ultra 5 245K, and their KF-series counterparts, which lack the iGPU. As with all early retailer listings, we recommend cautiously approaching them. Note that these are not official Intel prices just yet. After all, these numbers might be placeholders that LambdaTek put on its website to make a valid listing.
Since LambdaTek is primarily based in Europe and we were accessing its UK website, the prices were shown in British Pounds. So, we’ve converted the pricing based on the prevailing rate of £1 to $1.31. We’re utilizing the pricing excluding VAT (value-added tax) to compare the Arrow Lake chips with the previous Raptor Lake Refresh lineup.
Arrow Lake | LambdaTek Price Excluding VAT | Raptor Lake Refresh | MSRP |
---|---|---|---|
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | GBP 471.83 (around $620) | Intel Core i9-14900K | $589 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | GBP 327.35 (around $430) | Intel Core i7-14700K | $409 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF | GBP 314.60 (around $415) | Intel Core i7-14700KF | $384 |
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | GBP 250.86 (around $330) | Intel Core i5-14600K | $319 |
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF | GBP 238.11 (around $312) | Intel Core i5-14600KF | $294 |
Looking at our results, the Core Ultra 9 285K is up to 5.26% more expensive than the Core i9-14900K. The most significant increase comes from the Core Ultra 7 265KF, with pricing jumping by 8.07% from the previous generation. Meanwhile, the Core Ultra 7 265 K’s price increase was 5.13%, falling in line with the Core Ultra 9 285K. On the other hand, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K had the smallest increase, with the launch price only going up by 3.44%. However, the Core Ultra 5 245KF appears to be 6.12% more expensive than the Core i5-14600KF.
These price increases are slightly higher than the average U.S. inflation rate in 2023, which is 4.1%. Nevertheless, since the 14th Generation Raptor Lake Refresh chips had the same launch prices as their predecessors, we’re essentially getting the Arrow Lake chips at a lower price, mainly because the average U.S. inflation rate in 2022 was a whopping 8%.
Arrow Lake allegedly hits the market on October 10, and until then, we won’t know exactly how much these chips will retail for. But if these prices are accurate, Arrow Lake could be a serious competitor against AMD’s Ryzen 9000 processors, which have been on the market for a few months now.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
It’s been 30 years since Intel’s infamous Pentium FDIV bug reared its ugly head – a math bug caused Intel’s first CPU recall
AMD crowns the Ryzen 7 9800X3D a ‘gaming legend’ in a surprise announcement — chipmaker claims $479 Zen 5 3D V-Cache chip is up to an average 20% faster than Intel Core Ultra 9 flagship
-
Alvar "Miles" Udell And if they follow AMD's lead they'll be below MSRP by November and well below by Black Friday.Reply -
KyaraM As the article points out, these aren't final prices. Wouldn't be the first time the actual MSRP is lower. Of course, it also wouldn't be the first time the listing is indeed correct. We will see next month latest I guess.Reply -
baboma UK pricing has never matched up 1:1 with US. It's an idiotic compare.Reply
The valid takeaway is that ARL-S launch on 10/10 will be backed up with real shipment.
OTOH, nothing has been heard for Z890 boards, so launch availability still remains a question mark, and of course there'll be a hefty price premium.
>And if they follow AMD's lead they'll be below MSRP by November and well below by Black Friday.
Doubtful. For 12/13/14th gens, Intel CPUs have had small discounts relative to AMD Ryzens 5K/7K (and presumably 9K). BF sales are typically for last-gen products, not products just launched. -
usertests Pricing leaks are pretty worthless. Too many placeholder prices, foreign prices not directly translating even if you want to play around with VAT, and the companies can change them at the very last minute if they want to. And no matter what, it's likely to be within 5-10% of what you could guess by yourself. I advise people not to care, just wait until announcements.Reply -
baboma >Pricing leaks are pretty worthless. Too many placeholder prices, foreign prices not directly translating even if you want to play around with VATReply
I keep hoping THW would budget for less incompetent "filler" writers. Disregarding the fact that most these filler pieces were scraped directly from other HW sites, the regurgitating is always cringeworthy, as to wit this garbage piece.
>Will be interesting to see consumer reaction when real pricing is out
The only people who actually care are 0-day early adopters, and by definition they are price-insensitive. "Consumers" won't care one way or another. Pricing will be in-line with prior gen, a few dollars more or less. -
strobolt What's up with the naming scheme of Arrow Lake? Why is the 900 now 85 and not 90? Same with 700/65 and 600/45. Are they reserving numbering for a "refresh" with slightly increased clocks? Imo, would've been great if the they are changing things up that they would've gone with the number of P-cores for the first number and then second number is relative order of the processors with the same number of P-cores based on clocks.Reply
In general, how is this new naming working now? "Core Ultra" translates to "i" I guess and the 2 in the hundreds is the generation? Meteor Lake was 100, Arrow lake is 200, Lunar Lake is 200V and Panther lake is 300. What's the logic in that? -
baboma >Why is the 900 now 85 and not 90? Same with 700/65 and 600/45.Reply
The new scheme is more consistent than the prior 'i#' scheme. Before, the tier i5/7/9 number is the same as the part number for 7 and 9 (14700/14900), but not 5 (14600). Now, they are decoupled for all tiers.
>Are they reserving numbering for a "refresh" with slightly increased clocks?
The decoupling may not matter for '7' and '9', which have only one model per tier, but is relevant for '5' and reportedly '3', which have multiple models.
>Imo, would've been great if the they are changing things up that they would've gone with the number of P-cores for the first number and then second number is relative order of the processors with the same number of P-cores based on clocks.
The goal is to make parts simpler to understand for users. Yours above gets into the weeds. As it is, consumers already need a decoder ring to understand CPU names, especially for mobile CPUs.
That said, part of a product name is the marketing, which is always important. The "Core Ultra" series, starting with Meteor Lake, is a new design, and needs to have a new name to highlight its new features.
Core Ultra 9 is admittedly less shorthand-friendly than Core i9. Perhaps CU will become the new shorthand, or perhaps people will just use the 3-digit part number (which imparts more info anyway). When it comes to klunky names, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is definitely worse, and is a good example of marketing gone amok. -
vijosef Processor naming has become a labyrinth. I can no longer determine a CPU's performance based on its name alone.Reply