AMD silently launches RX 7800M GPU — mobile Navi 32 with 12GB of VRAM

AMD Radeon GPU
(Image credit: AMD)

AMD has officially debuted its sixth discrete GPU in its mobile RX 7000 lineup, the RX 7800M. The new GPU is AMD's second mobile RDNA 3 GPU to arrive with a chipset-style architecture and is the runner-up to the flagship RX 7900M.

The RX 7800M is armed with 60 RDNA 3 compute units, 96 ROPS, 3,840 stream processors, 48MB of Infinity Cache, and a game clock of 2,145MHz. Bus width was not mentioned, but we suspect it is using a 192-bit interface. Memory bandwidth is rated at up to 432GB/s, memory capacity is 12GB, and GDDR6 ICs operate at up to 18 Gbps. GPU power consumption is rated at up to 180W.

AMD's new chipset-style mobile GPU is essentially a stripped-down RX 7800 XT operating at lower clock speeds and power consumption combined with lower memory specs from the RX 7700 XT. The GPU's compute unit count also aligns perfectly with the new Sony PS5 Pro's Compute Units, meaning the 7800M most likely would have the same compute power as the PS5 Pro in a theoretical scenario where GPU clocks and power consumption were the same.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
GPUsCUs / CoresGame Clock / Boost ClockMemory / Bus / Bandwidth
RX 7900M72 / 4,6081,825 MHz / 2,090 MHz16GB / 256-bit bus / 576GB/s
RX 7800M60 / 3,840 2,145 MHz 12GB / 192-bit bus / 432GB/s
RX 7800 XT60 / 3,8402,124 MHz / Boost Clock 2,430 MHz16GB / 256-bit bus / 624GB/s
RX 7700 XT54 / 3,4562,171 MHz / 2,544 MHz12GB / 192-bit bus / 432GB/s
RX 7600M XT32 / 2,0482,023 MHz / 2,469 MHz8GB / 128-bit bus / 288GB/s
RTX 4080 Laptop GPU7,424 CUDA coresBoost Clock 1,350 - 2,280 MHz8GB /128-bit bus
RTX 4070 Laptop GPU4,608 CUDA coresBoost Clock 1,230 - 2,175 MHz12GB / 192-bit bus

We previously discovered that the RX 7800M performs very similarly to AMD’s desktop RX 7700 XT in some vendor-provided benchmarks. This is unsurprising since both GPUs share the same memory configuration, and the GPU’s superior core count configuration offsets the 7700 XT’s low power/clock speed. Compared to Nvidia, the RX 7800M performs faster than its RTX 4070 laptop GPU but is slower than its RTX 4080 mobile counterpart. Performance was also a touch behind Nvidia’s desktop RTX 4070.

It remains to be seen how popular AMD’s RX 7800M will be. Even though AMD’s mobile RDNA 3 GPUs are pretty competitive in specs, it is rare to see any discrete AMD GPU in the laptop market, with only a few brands, such as Asus, putting much effort into AMD mobile GPU adoption. For instance, AMD’s RX 7900M was an exclusive GPU for the Dell Alienware M18 at launch, and AMD’s RX 7700S can only be found in select Asus and Framework laptops.

Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • usertests
    I guess it could be a while before we see RDNA4 mobile, but they still have to dump these to get rid of them. More eGPUs for the win.
    Reply
  • 1_rick
    What the heck is a chipset-style gpu?
    Reply
  • watzupken
    With a rated power requirement of 180W, this is competing with the RTX 4080 mobile. If the price is reasonable, I think it can be a good alternative since Nvidia is charging a ridiculous price for anything above the RTX 4060 in the mobile space.
    Reply
  • das_stig
    1_rick said:
    What the heck is a chipset-style gpu?
    I believe they mean chiplet GCD core configuration, good old TH, spend years a GPU reporter and get the basics wrong !!

    Reply
  • artk2219
    I feel like the bigger issue is that AMD just hasn't gotten many design wins for their mobile 7000 series. They have some decent options now, but it doesn't matter if no one want to actually use them in their designs.
    Reply
  • subspruce
    watzupken said:
    With a rated power requirement of 180W, this is competing with the RTX 4080 mobile. If the price is reasonable, I think it can be a good alternative since Nvidia is charging a ridiculous price for anything above the RTX 4060 in the mobile space.
    180W is too much for a laptop card, let alone 200W. Nvidia caps out at 150W sans boost and 175W with boost.
    Reply