Twenty percent of hard drives used for long-term music storage in the 90s have failed

Hard Drives
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

About a fifth of the hard drives it receives from the media industry for service are completely dead, said enterprise information management company Iron Mountain, which specializes in records management, information destruction, data backup, and data recovery. This means information contained within those drives — including studio masters, live sessions, and everything in between — could be lost forever unless the recording label has backed up the missing data in another storage drive or medium.

“It’s so sad to see a project come into the studio, a hard drive in a brand-new case with the wrapper and the tags from wherever they bought it still in there,” Robert Koszela, the Global Director for Strategic Initiatives & Growth for Iron Mountain Media & Archive Services, told Mix. “Next to it is a case with the safety drive in it. Everything’s in order. And both of them are bricks.”

The migration to hard drives from tape storage began in earnest in the 2000s with the arrival of 5.1 Surround Sound and Guitar Hero. These technologies required labels to remaster their tracks, and they discovered that some of the tape they used to store the original recordings had started to deteriorate, with some already unplayable. They also had some tape records that still looked good, but they no longer have any compatible hardware to play them. Because of this, Mix says the music industry has focused on moving its tape archives to digital media like hard drives.

However, just like tape, hard drives also deteriorate — with most commercial drives rated to last for only three to five years. Even if you store them in the most optimum condition, you’ll find that even drives designed for archival storage will eventually die. Unfortunately, most often, the only time that a studio will open its archives is if it needs to look for original masters for commercial use. If it has waited too long, then it might be too late to recover the drive that it needs, resulting in the loss of all the information contained within.

Thankfully, researchers have continually been working on many different archival storage media that are more reliable than hard drives and even solid-state drives (which only have a limited number of reads and writes). We’ve even seen a startup working on archival glass storage that it claims could last 5,000 years. However, until the arrival of these media at affordable prices, the only thing that we can do to ensure the integrity of our data archives is to completely rewrite them to newer media with backups every three to five years.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • Gururu
    AI can recreate the original works no problem.
    Reply
  • dimar
    They couldn't archive the data to m-disc Blu-ray??
    Reply
  • jp7189
    Gururu said:
    AI can recreate the original works no problem.
    While I think your comment was meant to be snarky, it is true that AI is fantastic at filling it missing gaps. If these drives had media errors it is likely AI could help. Not so much for a completely lost drive.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    dimar said:
    They couldn't archive the data to m-disc Blu-ray??
    That did not exist 25 years ago.
    Reply
  • OneMoreUser
    dimar said:
    They couldn't archive the data to m-disc Blu-ray??
    That would take them using time machines to transport those Blu-ray discs and hardware needed 20 years back in time, that is expensive so not a viable suggestion. Wanna try again?

    Articles like this should be a wake up call to all people with digital data stored, there is bound to tons of family memories hidden away on digital storage. And it is not like the drives or other media used is only a potential issue if they are 20 years old, so really everybody needs to make sure having multiple backups including having off-site ones. On the plus side even cheap thumb drives can holds lots of data these days, and they are very compact also which makes it easier to store - so having a extra backup with a friend or family member is not a big hassle.
    Reply
  • DiamondFlyer
    Absolutely shocking that no one thought in those 30 years about copying those old hard disks to new hard discs. Storage became dirt-cheap: you could literally copy 200 of your 1996 average 3Gb disk to a single 750Gb drive in 2006!!!
    If we can do this at home with our family photos and movies collection, why are majors not capable to do that with their precious art???
    Reply
  • Heiro78
    I just recently got a bluray burner to transfer some old data from CDs and DVDs. Crazy how it will all fit onto a single 25GB bluray. I remember back in the day getting dual layer DVDs to maximize storage.
    Reply
  • DS426
    Any data that matters at all should be backed up and ideally using that 3-2-1 strategy at a minimum. This and testing the ability to restore backups should not only be firmly executed by any legitimate IT professional but made to be general knowledge to everyone. This seems obvious but it has slipped even some large organizations at times, at least in some ways. at times .

    There probably weren't strong PSA's broadcasted to the music industry, so some very much slipped thru the cracks.
    Reply
  • rgd1101
    just a few days ago. there another member want to get data from cassette tape from the 80s with unknown system.
    more than just storage, need the system and possible software to open the data.
    Reply
  • JeffreyP55
    Admin said:
    Iron Mountain says that one-fifth of the storage media it receives from the music industry are bricked.

    Twenty percent of hard drives used for long-term music storage in the 90s have failed : Read more
    I have three WD 2TB black 3.5 drives I now use for storage only. Two are more than 10 years old.
    Reply